Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Democracy and Society Hyper Pluralism

Satisfactory Essays
638 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Democracy and Society Hyper Pluralism
Test prep
Choice #1 The framers of the Constitution established a representative democracy. Political scientists have developed at least three theories of American democracy --- pluralism, elitism, and hyper pluralism. A.) Pluralist: Pluralism is the theory that a multitude of groups, not the people as a whole, govern the United States
Elitism: elite theory is a theory of the state which seeks to describe and explain the power relationships in contemporary society
Hyper pluralism: Hyper pluralism is the same as the pluralism theory with different perspective. While people who believe in pluralism is optimistic, hyper pluralism is a pessimistic and extreme. B.) In the Pluralist theory citizens play an important role in politics. They can form groups and promote their interests (interests groups). In Elitism theories, citizens have a limited participation because of the unequal share of power, in the sense that others are favored more and those citizens in this are limited of expression. C.) The Elitism theory is a theory that accepts group’s concerns and grievances but the power is given more to the elite (superior). This theory promotes democracy by letting individuals form groups based on common interests, but it limits them because elite’s opinions and concerns matter the most and that which is an unbalanced share of democracy. Though the participation is evident, the representation is unfair, going against ideal democracy which is for the people of the people by the people.

Choice #2
The Constitution has been amended over time to reflect changes in the American political system. No issue has received more attention among these amendments than that of voting rights. A.)The 15th amendment gave all American citizens, no matter their race or wealth, the right to vote while the 19th amendment gave women the right to vote after hundreds of years of being cut off from society and their natural rights. The 26th amendment also had an impact on voting rights by it changed the voting age of 21 to 18 years of age, now younger Americans are able to have their voice heard in politics.
B.)
The 15th amendment has changed the nature of the electorate because it allowed slave’s form being forbidden to vote. The 19th amendment allowed women to vote fixed the gap between the two sexes; women were now opened too much success through this one important change. The 26th amendment changed the voting age form 21 to 18 because those drafted to war stated that if they were old enough to fight they were old enough to vote. Through all these changes caused a increase in the voting population and more beneficial elections.

Choice #4
The Federalist system in the United States was intended to divide power between the federal government and state governments. Since the creation of the federal system, however, power has tended to gravitate from the states to the federal government.
A.)McCullough v. Maryland
“Maryland passed legislation to impose taxes on the bank. James W. McCulloch, the cashier of the Baltimore branch of the bank, refused to pay the tax.”
“The Court held that Congress had the power to incorporate the bank and that Maryland could not tax instruments of the national government employed in the execution of constitutional powers” This gave the state government a sense of what type of role they play in crucial decisions. The higher end of the government opinions matters most unlike the lower ends, similar to the elitism’s theory.
B.) Federal grants to states: “federal grants are economic aid issued by the United States government out of the general federal revenue” This shows which government is like the big brother and can do much more of a job when it comes to help and aid. This again goes back to the Elitism Theory, because the federal government is more superior to the states government.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Like elitism, pluralism can be seen as a realist view of politics, in that it asserts that a diverse range of interests exists within society, and that those interests are represented. This creates multiple groups with various interests such as business and interest groups. Pluralists claim that no one group dominates the…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A pluralist government is much like the opposite of the elitist government. In a pluralist government the power of decision making and policy making are based more on the wants and needs of many rather than just a few. It is said to be a government of the people, by the people, for the people.Everyones views are valued regardless of ones position in society. This is similar to the type of government we have…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pluralist democracy works with numerous organised groups who all have some political power in the decision-making setting. It assumes that it’s ‘neutral’ government who listens to, and acts on the outcomes of these competing interests. Thus the large number and operation of pressure groups is considered to be a vital element in the promotion of pluralist democracy.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cello

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5. The society had a centralized government, which suggests an organized central bureaucracy and a stratified set of social classes existed in order to ensure the survival and protection of the group and control of the government…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    international business notes

    • 3684 Words
    • 15 Pages

    c. Low- ranking indicates the society deemphasized the differences between citizens' power and wealth; equlaity and opportunity for everyone is stressed…

    • 3684 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Introduction: To analyse the compatibility of democracy with elitism it is first important to define both the terms democracy and elitism. Democracy is in its simplest form is the rule for the people by politicians etc, and elitism is most simply known as ‘a class that rules and a class that is ruled’. This therefore opens up the question, do those in higher positions effectively rule those lower down, democracy within elitism, and the effects if elitism was not around. ‘a minority which monopolises the effective exercise of power’. P69, schwarzmantel.…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Elite theory

    • 333 Words
    • 1 Page

    The theoretical view held by many social scientists which holds that American politics is best understood through the generalization that nearly all political power is held by a relatively small and wealthy group of people sharing similar values and interests and mostly coming from relatively similar privileged backgrounds. Most of the top leaders in all or nearly all key sectors of society are seen as recruited from this same social group, and elite theorists emphasize the degree to which interlocking corporate and foundation directorates, old school ties and frequent social interaction tend to link together and facilitate coordination between the top leaders in business, government, civic organizations, educational and cultural establishments and the mass media. This "power elite" can effectively dictate the main goals (if not always the practical means and details) for all really important government policy making (as well as dominate the activities of the major mass media and educational/cultural organizations in society) by virtue of their control over the economic resources of the major business and financial organizations in the country. Their power is seen as based most fundamentally on their personal economic resources and especially on their positions within the top management of the big corporations, and does not really depend upon their ability to garner mass support through efforts to "represent" the interests of broader social groups. Elitist theoreticians differ somewhat among themselves on such questions as how open the power elite is to "new blood," the exact degree of agreement or disagreement that usually prevails within its ranks, and the degree of genuine concern (or lack thereof) for the broader public welfare that enters into their choices of public policy goals, but all such theorists broadly share the notion that it is these few thousand "movers and shakers" who really run the country and determine the basic…

    • 333 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pluralism: is, in the general sense, the acknowledgment of diversity. The concept is used, often in different ways, in a wide range of issues. In politics, pluralism is often considered by proponents of modern democracy to be in the interests of its citizens, and so political pluralism is one of its most important features. The term pluralism is also used to denote a theoretical standpoint on state and power - which to varying degrees suggest that pluralism is an adequate model of how power is distributed in societies.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public goods are goods that are indivisible to some extent where individuals who don't contribute to their provision cannot be prevented from enjoying them…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pluralism Vs Marxism

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page

    The pluralist view the state as a mechanism that represents the interests of every member of the state. The pluralist theory goes a step further stating that no certain powers control the social contract as everyone has an equal state in it. The elitist on the other stress material power. Meaning that those who have the most resources should be more successful, have a higher mental capacity, and be rightful rulers, otherwise they wouldn't have gotten into their possession. Both elitist and pluralist agree that interest groups have the ability to participate in the U.S. political system. However, this is only their extent in similarity. Pluralism as Steven Luke's mentions could be portrayed by the one dimensional system in its view of power,…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    12. Two-Party System: in an election, only Republican or Democratic Party’s candidates have a realistic chance of winning public office.…

    • 2255 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The aristocracy as Aristotle puts it is the rule of several. When a virtuous rule of law prevails the society enjoys solidity. In this rule, the needs of the wealthy get priority…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Key Words - Notes

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The view that politics and decisions making are located mostly in the framework or government, but that many non-governmental groups use their resources to exert influence.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Politicians have the same constitution to respect as the citizens; therefore, they have to respect the rights of the citizen…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Exploring Political Issues

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The first theory to be defined is pluralism. This theory governs political science with its…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays