Preview

Cross 9e TBB Ch07

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2373 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cross 9e TBB Ch07
Chapter 7

Criminal Law and Cyber Crime

N.B.: TYPE indicates that a question is new, modified, or unchanged, as follows.

N A question new to this edition of the Test Bank.
+ A question modified from the previous edition of the Test Bank.
= A question included in the previous edition of the Test Bank.

true/false questions

1. In a criminal case, the state must prove its case by a preponderance of the evidence.

answer: F PAGES: Section 1 TYPE: N BUSPROG: Reflective AICPA: BB-Legal

2. The sanctions imposed on criminal wrongdoers are the same as those applied in civil cases.

ANSWER: F PAGES: Section 2 TYPE: N BUSPROG: Analytic AICPA: BB-Legal

3. One element that normally must exist for a person to be convicted of a crime is the performance of a prohibited act.

answer: T PAGES: Section 2 TYPE: + BUSPROG: Analytic AICPA: BB-Legal

4. The crime of theft requires only the taking of another person’s property, not the awareness that the property belongs to another.

answer: F PAGES: Section 2 TYPE: N BUSPROG: Analytic AICPA: BB-Legal

5. The federal criminal code lists more than four thousand criminal offenses, all of which require a specific mental state.

ANSWER: F PAGES: Section 2 TYPE: N BUSPROG: Analytic AICPA: BB-Legal

6. Corporate officers and directors may be held criminally liable for the actions of employees under their supervision.

ANSWER: T PAGES: Section 2 TYPE: N BUSPROG: Analytic AICPA: BB-Legal

7. Falsifying public records or altering a legal document is larceny.

ANSWER: F PAGES: Section 3 TYPE: N BUSPROG: Analytic AICPA: BB-Leveraging Technology

8. The crime of bribery occurs when the bribe is offered—it is not required that the bribe be accepted.

answer: t PAGES: Section 3 TYPE: + BUSPROG: Reflective AICPA: BB-Legal

9. An employer’s failure to remit state withholding taxes that were collected from employee wages cannot constitute a crime.

answer: F PAGES: Section 3 TYPE: N BUSPROG: Reflective

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Unfortunately, a corporation can be charged and convicted of any number of crimes. If the employees or officers within a corporation violate the law on behalf of the corporation and within the scope of their employment, the corporate entity would be open to criminal charges. Corporations can be convicted of criminal wrongdoing in the same manner individuals are charged and convicted. In addition, individuals within the corporation can be charged as well. Commonly, when a corporation is charged, many of the top officers will be charged along with the corporation as an entity.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch14

    • 2169 Words
    • 12 Pages

    More than two hundred years ago, the Declaration of Independence recognized the importance of protecting creative works.…

    • 2169 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch02

    • 2690 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Under the authority of a long arm statute, a court can exercise personal jurisdic­tion over certain out-of-state defendants.…

    • 2690 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bhm443 Mod 4 Case (Tu()

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Corporations, by legal charter, are not a single entity and do not have a central owner; however, this does not keep corporations from being liable for criminal actions or criminal liability. Corporate criminal liability in law determines to what extent a corporation, basically a fictitious entity, can be held liable for acts and omissions of actual people that the corporation employs. In 1909, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a corporation “could be held criminally liable for the acts, omissions, or failures of an agent acting within the scope of his employment” (Carrasco & Dupee, 1999). Corporations themselves cannot do actions and so criminal liability falls to the employees of the corporation and two elements comprise criminal violations by corporate employees; intent and the guilty act. Carrasco and Dupee (1999), state, “For a corporation to be liable, the employee committing the illicit act must be acting within the scope of her employment”. This requirement is generally met if the employee has actual or apparent authority to engage in the particular act in question and the corporation can give either direct authority or authority through perceived authority (Carrasco & Dupee, 1999). Under federal law, a corporation is criminally responsible for the actions of any of its employees taken within the scope of their employment for the benefit of the corporation. It makes no difference whether the employees’ conduct violates corporate policy or contravenes explicit instructions not to engage in the conduct (Hasnas, 2006). Under this presumption and law of corporate criminal responsibility “there is nothing a corporation can do to ensure that it is not guilty of a criminal offense. Corporate managers know that no matter how good their firm’s internal controls, they cannot guarantee that there will be no intentional or inadvertent violations of law by its employees” (Hasnas, 2006). If an employee is…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminal Law: deals with establishing standards for acceptable social behavior—when criminal law is violated sanctions typically include jail time. It is included in public law. Usually State vs. Person.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are certain types of cases that a director/officer can be liable. In this case, Greg Allen was found liable for damages just as his corporation was, however it was later vacated because the court determined that corporate officers are not generally liable for contractual obligations. Later, the court reversed the judgment that Greg Allen was not individually responsible. Liability of shareholders is determined by common law and generally, officers are not liable for torts committed by its agents. Agents that commit a tortious act (criminal, punishable, etc.), however, can be personally liable along with the principle. For this case, the agent, Greg Allen, was accused of negligence and the Estelle’s’ filed a suit against him as well as the corporation. According to Miller & Jentz, the corporation is liable for torts committed by its agents or officers within the scope of their employment. The liability would fall on the corporation because the agent, Greg, was directly working within the scope of his employment at the Estelle’s. The court ruled that the breach of contract fell on Greg Allen Construction and eventually retracted stating Greg Allen himself should have also been liable due to Greg participating in the negligent conduct. Since the duty of the agent was to work in an appropriate manner and…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study-James Hardie

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Piercing the corporate veil is not the only means by which a director or officer of a corporation can be held liable for the actions of the corporation. Liability can be established through conventional theories of contract, agency, or tort law. For example, in situations where a director or officer acting on behalf of a corporation personally commits a tort, he and the corporation are jointly liable and it is unnecessary to discuss the issue of piercing the corporate veil. The doctrine is often used in cases where liability is found, but the corporation is insolvent.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch04

    • 2759 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Unless a corporation violates a law, its actions do not raise questions about the role of corporations and the effect of corporate ethics on profit.…

    • 2759 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This paper will include what the insanity statutes are in Ohio, the state that I live in. I will also talk about how often the insanity defense is used in the United States. As well as how successful this defense is. I will also discuss if psychologists should give their ultimate opinion in regards to sanity cases as well as the ethical issues that may rise from their opinions. Lastly, I will discuss how difficult it is to provide adequate psychological care for mentally ill patients while they are incarcerated in prison. The care they would have received had they been institutionalized in a mental hospital instead would have resulted in fewer deaths.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    -Ramona French 2011. The court has to prove that the defendant has committed the murder, that the killing was premeditated and done intentionally, or that it was done with complete disregard for human life. If the court of law has enough evidence to…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch08

    • 2456 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The major difference between international law and national law is that government authorities can enforce national law.…

    • 2456 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To this day, only five states deny the defendant of the use of insanity defense. The insanity defense has such a firm historical and moral origin that provide fairness to defendants who suffer from mental disorders. It is important that the government and the public to treat them with consideration; provide them with the treatment that suitable for the individual’s illness to make them better in hope of release them back into the community when they are no longer a threat to the public rather than to confine them in prison and let them…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    what is crime

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    but these are not (usually) criminal acts. The distinction between a civil and a criminal case…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch06

    • 2489 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Administrative agencies at various levels of government work together and share the responsibility of enforcing particular regulations.…

    • 2489 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    A person is guilty of theft if he or she dishonestly appropriates property without the consent of its owner, with the intention of depriving the owner of it. If the person believes they have the owner’s consent, if the owner knew of the assumption of the property and the circumstances in which it was taken then the crime theft does not come into play here. However, if consent obtained by deception or intimidation, this is not consent. The mens rea of theft consists of dishonesty and intention to permanently deprive…

    • 2069 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics