Preview

Compare And Contrast Trial Court And Appellate Court

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
417 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast Trial Court And Appellate Court
The difference between trial courts and appellate courts are complex, but are two important entities necessary within the justice system. Trial courts grant the initial pass for a civil or criminal proceeding to have a voice in court. Appellate courts have authority to reassess findings decided on at trial court level. There are four essential parts amidst trial and appellate courts: purpose, evidence, juries, and judges (Ehow.com, 2012).
Purpose
Trial court focuses on finding the facts in determining the best decision for the case brought forth. The focus for appellate court is quite different since the facts in the proceeding came from trial court level. Appellate court consists of two considerably uncommon aspects. One aspect determines if either group was granted an unbiased hearing. The other aspect establishes if law was properly used in the case and to determine if for any reason to alter the law
…show more content…
Forms of evidence offered may come as an eye witness as well as an illustration. Additionally, since the establishment of the facts was decided in trial court, no other evidence may enter in the appellate court level. As an alternative, disputing lawyers in appellate court formulate a strategy on the basis of laws and procedure matters (Ehow.com, 2012).
Juries
Juries consist of a collection of residents brought together to form a decision on a case. Seating arrangements are either in a criminal or civil case, in which the assessment of evidence is present and decisions made are from facts provided. Juries aid solely at trial court level, and because they are truth locators, there is no position in appellate court since the decision established from facts formulated at trial level. Furthermore, judges listen and decide the final word of every appeal (Ehow.com, 2012).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    BLTE 10e AM Ch03

    • 3437 Words
    • 11 Pages

    A trial court is a court in which a lawsuit begins, a trial takes place, and evidence is presented. An appellate court reviews the rulings of trial court, on appeal from a judgment or order of the lower court.…

    • 3437 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Homework Assignment 5

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Jurisdiction is the authority of a court to hear and decide cases. There are several types; a few are Appellate Jurisdiction, General Jurisdiction, Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Personal Jurisdiction. Appellate is a court that hears a case an appeal from a lower court. General is a court that hears various kinds of cases in general. Subject Matter is a court that can hear only certain kinds of cases listed in the federal statutes and constitution. Personal is a court that makes decisions binding on the person involved in a civil case.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Explain the difference between original and appellate jurisdiction. The difference between the original jurisdiction and the appellate jurisdiction is original jurisdiction who is the lower court gets to hear the court case first meanwhile the appellate the high power court can review decision and change the outcome. 2.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law M1

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In criminal courts juries look upon the factors and decide if the verdict is guilty or not, whereas the judge looks on the law and decides the sentence. On the other hand, the judges in civil cases decide if the verdict is liable or not beyond reasonable doubt and if the verdict needs to pay injunctions.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some are seen as Circuit or District Courts. These circuits can ask the supreme courts to hear the case. Not all cases are eligible to be reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Courts.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    BUSI301 TEST QUESTION

    • 2171 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It is important to remember that state trial court decisions are binding only on the parties involved in the dispute. Trial court decisions do not set precedent for future disputes or parties. Only appellate-level courts set precedent.…

    • 2171 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adversary vs. Civil Law

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The two legal systems in question are the adversary system, most commonly practiced in the United States, and the civil law system, also referred to as the inquisitorial system, most commonly practiced in European countries. Both systems have the same goal; to find the truth. However, each system has a very different path to justice. The adversarial system implies that two parties assume opposite positions in debating the guilt or innocence of an individual. In this scenario, the judge is required to be neutral at the contest unfolding before him or her. The role of the judge in this arrangement is to ensure the trial proceeds according to the procedural rules of trial or due process of law and that evidence entered is done so accordingly. The basis of this approach in criminal matters in which two sides engage in debate and battle about the guilt or innocence of an accused and since each side wants to win, then the debate will foster a critical look at the issues and the evidence to be examined by both parties. By engaging in this discourse, the truth should emerge as the judge watches on. This means that the roles played on both sides are very distinct. The defense counsel as one adversarial party gather the arguments to defend the client and attacks the credibility and worthiness of the evidence presented. The prosecutor puts forth the arguments on behalf of the state and gathers and presents the evidence pointing that the accused has committed an offense. The judge is the referee and arbitrator on issues related to clarifying what the law is. The judge does not intervene on any side except where procedural fairness is jeopardized by either party as dictated by the Sixth Amendment. In an inquisitorial system, a judge is involved in the preparation of evidence along with the police and in how the various parties are to present their case at the trial. The judge questions witnesses in depth and can even call witnesses to appear while prosecution and defense…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The basic trial court in the Federal system is called the U.S. District Courts. The district courts try minor civil cases ($10,000 or more) and criminal cases (misdemeanor trials and felonies) and deals with issues involving certain federal agencies. In addition, the U.S. District Courts serves as the federal trial court for admiralty, bankruptcy, customs and maritime cases. If a dispute arose under the Constitution, laws o treaties of the United States such as environmental protections, job discrimination and education of the…

    • 83 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appeals court “appellate court” has the final verdict for the state. The judgment in this court are final, one cannot appeal the case unless it engaged in any federal laws or legitimate procedures.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nevada State Court System

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Trial court of limited jurisdiction deals only with the specific types of cases and located near the cities and usually presided over by a single judge. The example of trial court system includes:…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court History and Purpose

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Expressing the revulsion people feel for those who commit particularly heinous crimes. Because they are given the task of punishing wrongdoers, courts serve as an agency of social control, determining which behaviors may be acceptable and which deserve severe sanction] (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011, p. 3). Courts play such a critical role simply because they determine what should happen to those who violate the law. There is a criminal court, and there is a civil court. Civil courts deal with private party issues, whereas criminal courts try suspected offenders (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011). In court, cases are handled differently than others. A person who creates a more serious offense will receive more harsh consequences in court as compared to a person who faces a less serious crime.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As the Court restricts the cases it reviews to appeals of a previous decision generally no witnesses are called nor is new evidence presented. Written arguments are submitted for review along with relevant amicus curiae briefs from outside interest groups. Timed oral arguments are then presented to the Court by each party subject to questions by the Justices. The decision of the Court is determined by majority vote and the opinion of the Court along with dissenting and concurring opinions made public by publication in the United States Supreme Court…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trial courts are the courts where cases begin. In the trial court, both sides present proof to demonstrate their variant of what happened. The majority of the confirmation displayed in the trial court originates from witness and shows things and records associated with the case. In appellate court there are no witnesses, and no confirmation is displayed. In appellate courts, the legal counselors essentially contend lawful and arrangement issues under the watchful eye of the judge or a gathering of judges. The other difference between the two courts are the judges. In trial courts, there is one judge in the courtroom. That judge decides what evidence can and cannot be used and often decides the outcome of the case. And lastly, the contrast between the trial courts and the appellate courts is the part of the jury. A jury is a gathering of natives who listen to the actualities and settle on choices about the case. A jury is now and again utilized as a part of trial courts to choose the case. When it comes to the appellate court, there is no jury in the courts. The appellate judges decide the result of all…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appeals Process

    • 699 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What is an appeal? An appeal is a “proceeding in which a case is brought before a higher court for a review of a lower court’s judgment” (pg. 465). This basically means a process which takes place because the defendant and their attorney feel that the verdict that was given was inaccurate which was due to something that may have happened during trial or the arrest. Appeals are done to make sure that the person has had a fair trial and none of their rights were violated. An appellate court as the text states can help an area decided on how to address certain issues. This is good because the appellate court judges can make a decision without having to worry about what society will think and if they will get reelected. An appellate court goes through cases and tries to understand what has taken place during the arrest and see if the law was upheld. An appeals process starts right after the trial, the defense must submit an appeal to the court. The person appealing should file all documents with the appellate court. The will then file briefs and the court will later hear each sides argument and decide/ once the decision is made the courts will announce their findings and why. An appellate court is based on the law not on any facts so a defense attorney cannot argue the facts presented during the case or that you were found guilty and you believe you are innocent. Your appeal should consist of the fairness for example if you had the right to a speedy trial or a defense attorney etc.…

    • 699 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The role of Jurors and Magistrates are similar in many ways. A few examples of the similarities would be that both must be 18-70 years old. In addition to this, those who are in the police force or have previous criminal convictions are ruled out. Both magistrates and jurors are members of the public and do not get paid for going to court. However, both can claim expenses for any earnings lost during the time they spent in court. Both parties make their decisions and verdicts on the facts presented to them. Not only this but both can decided whether a defendant is guilty or not guilty.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays