Civil Disobedience And Non-Violence

In this essay, I will explain why civil disobedience was the most important concept for Gandhi. He believed that non- violence was superior that violence, because it does not harm anyone but it awakens the peaceful spirit causing conscious suffering. I will discuss how civil disobedience can be more powerful than guns and my views on the subject. I will provide examples of the drawbacks of civil disobedience and in which situations is not appropriate. I will go into further detail on the correct path to political change and a time that I can think of, when non-violence worked better for me.
Civil disobedience was the most important for Gandhi because non- violence is perceived as a personal and political value, is the power of change. He believes that non-violence is the weapon of the strong and by doing so, you are being more valuable, not harming others and awakening the inner peace of the mindless causing conscious suffering. In the practice of civil disobedience and non-violence, there is absolutely no violence under any circumstances and it always holds the truth. It can be used as different forms of social and political action.
Non- violent civil disobedience can be more powerful than guns because it is, the people revealing against evilness. For example we have seen many social movement that have made an impact in political views. Rosa Park is a great example, she refused to give her seat to white men and was arrested for civil disobedience. She did not follow, an unjust law which required African Americans, to give up their seat to white people when the bus was full. Because of her arrest, there was boycotting against the law for a long period of time which then led to supreme decision banning segregation on public transportation, this example shows how civil disobedience can be more powerful than