There are two views, Causalist and Statisticalist, which address how fitness and natural selection are connected to evolution. Causalists believe fitness differences cause evolutionary change and that populations change because of selection. Darwin may at first appear to be whole-heartedly a Causalist, but after addressing Paley and his views, one can tell that Darwin could also be considered a Statisticalist. Statisticalists view fitness as a way to quantitatively track changes in a species; however, they stand by the fact that correlation does not prove causation. Ramsey clarifies this idea when saying, “[Statisticalists] understand core evolutionary concepts like fitness and selection to be mere statistical summaries of underlying causal processes. In this view, evolutionary changes cannot be causally explained by selection or fitness.” From a genetic standpoint, these underlying causes may include pleiotropy, one gene controlling more than one phenotype, or genetic linkage, when alleles in a similar location are usually inherited together. However, from a theistic interpretation perhaps there is a higher power at …show more content…
Darwin explicitly states that it takes a very long time for these individuals to develop into the organisms they are now. At first there may be minimal differences within the same species, but as time goes on it continues to increase as those organisms with fitter traits survive and pass on their traits. This diversity continues to grow until the varieties among these organisms becomes so distinct that a new species is formed. Although Darwin does not specifically endorse an intelligent designer, he leaves room for a higher power in his explanation of evolution. It is almost as if Darwin sets up evolution, natural selection, and fitness as dominos and in order for those dominos to fall, creating the vast amount of complexity that exists within organisms today, something-- perhaps a higher power-- would have to push the first domino