Preview

Caudillo System in Latin America

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
473 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Caudillo System in Latin America
The caudillo system established in Latin America after the wars for independence consisted of unstable transitional governments that achieved few of the goals recognized in an effective democratic government. Despite these shortcomings, the caudillo system maintained a predictable social order and prevented chaos. This system was the best available until the formation of a middle class could be achieved, resulting in a more democratic political system.
The caudillo system came to be a common form of government in Latin America for several reasons. The first, and most apparent, reason for the establishment of the caudillo system, was the weak, precarious, and unstable governments left in place after independence was achieved. These countries, once colonies, had been under the rule of Spain, which meant that all government control came from an outside source that was imposed upon the inhabitants. Local armies, the only organized group prepared to take control, assumed power once the Spaniards were defeated. The transition from a military government to a government controlled by a "hero" from the army, the caudillo, was both logical and easy.
The caudillo often came from the creole aristocracy, which was supported by the military and the Roman Catholic Church. Occasionally, a mestizo or mulatto took power who quickly adopted the characteristics of the upper class. The main problem with having a creole in power was that his constituency, the creole class, was not interested in nor had no intention of, the reformation of land ownership or labor systems. This group wanted to stay on the top of the social ladder and had no incentive to make changes for the benefit of the majority and would not support any leader that would deprive them of their privileges. The caudillo maintained the status quo, therefore, lessening the potential conflict that could be created by a society with a constantly changing social order. Both upper and lower classes seemingly benefited from the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    5) How much has Latin America institutions and patterns of politics changed? Page Ref: 774…

    • 1278 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    11. Who were the caudillos? Why did they make new governments in Latin America unstable?…

    • 452 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    AP world history ch. 25

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Independent leaders who dominated local areas through force; considered a defiance of national policies; typical in newly independent Latin America…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Spanish believed that political continuity was very important in the early stages establishing hierarchical order so developing a…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The entire book centers on a single recurring theme: the foolishness of a democracy supporting dictators. Roorda maintains that “the dependence on dictators to attain the traditional U.S. goals of stability and cooperation in Latin America meant having to ignore those instances when the strongmen themselves incited unrest and conflict” (146-147). The U.S. military is partly to blame, since it trained Trujillo and treated him as a favored protégé, while diplomats saw through the dictator’s pageantry and disapproved of his methods (Trujillo returned their contempt). Roorda places heavy blame on the Roosevelt administration for allowing Trujillo to remain in power for the simple reason that Trujillo represented stability (even though his conduct at home and his occasional bloody attacks against neighboring Haiti disrupted Dominican-American relations). Roorda describes U.S. logic with Trujillo as “Dominican stability made him practical to deal with,” even if that meant not questioning the ethics of backing brutal regimes that did not threaten American dominance or prosperity.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    module 6 dba

    • 3227 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Caudillos (6.01): a Castilian word meaning leader; it’s usually used to describe a military leader at the head of an authoritarian regime…

    • 3227 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    And since the peninsulares has power over all other Latin Americans, that it was a frustration for each social class since they all want to have the same power. But it also especially frustrated the Creoles since they believe in the democratic ideals of fair representation and equality, values that conflicted with the very foundation of the hierarchical spanish colonial system. And this were one of the main things that caused the creoles to revolt in europe during the french revolution. But at the same time the Creoles were motivated by power, and in a way of being greedy and less reflective of enlightenment values of equality. The Creoles main focus was to overthrow the peninsulares so they can gain political representation of themselves, and to deny the other social classes power. And…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Colonization in Latin America had a major effect on the native people because of the Triangle Trade.When the Europeans took over the Americas, they also took over Africa and brought the Africans over though the Triangle Trade and forced the Africans to gather all of The gold that the Americans had because the Europeans wanted to get the gold the easy way, they didn't want to to all the work so the Europeans made the Africans do it. The Triangle Trade took place during the 18th century (Doc 2). The evidence from the picture and the quote show that the Spanish killed and destroyed a lot of people. Spanish forced the natives to do all their work while killing them at the same time. Colonization in Latin America had a major effect for those reasons.…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    How does Chile transition from democracy to a brutal 17 year dictatorship in one day? Some scholars argue that the end of democracy was a result of international interference from countries such as the United States and Cuba. Others insist that the abuse of authority and democratic process was the cause. Even though these are sound arguments, I do not believe that these claims go far back enough in Chile’s history to find the beginning of the problem. In this paper I argue that the breakdown of democracy in Chile was the result of low levels of economic development caused by colonial dependency. The dependency of Chile on the international market led to high rates of class inequality that resulted in radical reforms which created resistance from the elite class, enabling Pinochet…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are reasons why many of history’s greatest empires have tended to be either oligarchic or monarchial in nature. In observing the development of two of the ancient world’s most prominent models of representative government, the Athenian democracy and the Roman Republic, it can be concluded that when coupled with the political, economic, and social changes that come with expansion, the complications inherent with systems with democratic design prove incapable of running an empire.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Guatemalan Genocide

    • 2516 Words
    • 11 Pages

    From the majestic words of the brilliant Philoshope John Locke, a governmental system has the obligation to provide and work for the people, in either a direct or indirect matter. The system should satisfy and benefit the citizen in every possible aspect, rather than preventing the forward advancement of a nation’s people. Locke believed that the power of government should be controlled by the governed, and if the government fails to preserve the rights of the people, the power should be stripped away and the governed have the given right to overthrow the existing government. Although this principal is democratic in nature, it is a key factor in the relationship between the government and the governed of any given nation. In many Latin American countries, a strong central government has always been the most common form of administration. The government, regardless of being a democratic or a socialist one, manages and controls the majority if not all of the aspects of the country such as the regulation commerce, the distribution of natural resources, the overall management of the banking systems and the department of agriculture. This makes the country much more subjective to corruption and an unbalance of power with in its own system because the government has so much influence and control within the nation that it almost forms a political or social “monopoly”, in which there is no higher authority to regulate or police what, and in what way different aspects of…

    • 2516 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Latinos in United States

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to Gonzalez, some often describe the American model, in contrast to the ill-suited Spanish model, as one that was fundamentally suited for power and expansion. However, as Gonzalez argues in the chapter, his views are not particularly in accord with the general consensus because these views “ignore the discordant and unequal relationship that emerged between the US and Latin America from the first days of independence.” (Page 27).…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gonzalo's Ideal Society

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Gonzalo’s ideal society, there is no ranking based on title because everyone is on the same level. There would be no higher educated officials to govern those who are inferior; therefore, there would be no government at all. In today’s society, people are constantly complaining about how poorly our government is at administrating the people. By doing away with government all together, it would silence all the complaints and satisfy the people by allowing them to govern themselves.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The documentary Haiti and the Dominican Republic: An Island Divided discusses differences between two countries that share one land mass. In the first few seconds of the film the only visible separation or distinction viewers can observe is the Massacre River and the two different sides the countries occupy. However, moments later viewers are informed of the many deeper-rooted differences between the two countries and its people. Haiti and the Dominicans have had many conflicts over the years and this documentary helped give me a better understanding of the reasons and history from which these conflicts were born.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In America and Latin America had two different types of effects on its government. After the Civil War the U.S Industrialization industry grew tremendously with machines replacing hand labor. Industrialization is the development of industries in a country or region on a wide scale. Industrialization in America helped the country form a stable government because during the Industrial Revolution lots of new inventions were made. Because of all these new inventions factories had to manufacture them and that led to an increase in products which increased America's Industrialization which helped their economy thus leading them to a successful government. On the other hand in Latin America there Industrial period was completely opposite from Americas. The Industrial Revolution in Europe helped Latin America recover from their indepence war but Latin America had no industry which then lead them to form an unstable government. This created an unstable government because Latin America had to depend on other countries trading their resources to them. In Latin America there wasn't enough investments but there was new demands for their natural resources like coffee, sugar and beef. To conclude America's government was successful because they had a boom in new products which then increased their industrialization which helped their economy. Latin America's government wasn't successful because they depend on other countries trading resources to them and there wasn't enough investments there which hurt their economy thus affecting their government.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays