Some members of an audience would think differently or think more of a person they would look up to, whether it is a matter of higher standards or self-worth. However, I would argue for a more loose interpretation of a hero, a hero is not always what a person wants. When an audience specializes their definition of a hero, it becomes more difficult for an audience to see the heroic actions of a protagonist, favorable or not. For example, in the case of the hero, Batman, it is said “He's the hero Gotham deserves, but not the one it needs”. When it says needs that is in the perspective of the audience, the people of Gotham City. My interpretation, a looser one, would be closer to what Gotham deserves, what the hero has to offer in forms of heroism. The importance to keep little development of the basic principles of a hero allows the audience to appreciate the hero, and what they stand …show more content…
The superiority of a broad definition of a hero is due to the main, unanimous principles a hero has, not including morality. Since heroism can be applied to almost any protagonist, lessons and meaning can be learned from the hero’s struggle. It can create a hero that is relatable to a wide variety of people, and anyone can take away meaning, as unique as themselves. What they take away will create what is them, and how they deduct their reasoning and ideas. This all happens even if the protagonist is not the highest of moral standards, everyone learns or develops an opinion of the hero themselves, not just the plot. With that the broader definition of a hero allows for the reader to better formulate thoughts and ideas along with