Argumentative Essay On Liberal Government

Liberalism is currently the dominant ideology of the western world. As with any system of beliefs, leadership style or ideology, liberalism has too received ample criticism. Liberals argue that their ideology provides society with the ability to be individuals within a community by continuing to make strong legislation on civil rights. Although liberals believe strongly in individual rights and freedoms, its critics strongly question when these individual freedoms become a detriment to the society or country at large. Throughout this paper the role of today's liberal government will be evaluated, focusing on both the effectiveness and the short comings of its ideology.
To start, liberal democracy came to fruition when the American Revolution
On one hand "Americans strongly endorse human rights as abstract principles, but their commitment to human rights, their willingness to invest national resources and to take risks on behalf of human rights, is much weaker." McFarland and Mathews go onto say that people with more empathy, education and world knowledge expressed stronger conviction for human rights, where as the people who are in a socially dominant role focused less on human rights. So, with these two different views and two differentiating social values how does a government fully act on the peoples behalf? Or in the people's best interest? With these two views on human rights, how do you come about with socially desirable norms for people to follow? There isn't going to be one government that is perfect and that's why there is more then one party running, so that the most appropriate government sought by the people will be elected and then in return represent the people how they think they would want to be represented. Many countries around the world view liberalism as an ideology that represents the people in the best way possible, but how is this possible when you clearly have to different focuses from the different classes of people in your