Preview

12 angry men

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1002 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
12 angry men
“12 Angry Men”

The movie “12 Angry Men” takes place in a room within a courthouse where 12 men that have been selected for jury duty must decide the fate of a murder suspect. The group of men is made up of a diverse ethnic and social background which plays an important part in their decisions throughout the movie. In regards to Tuckman’s stages, the group introduce themselves to each other while acknowledging their purpose as jurors. After a lengthy trial they are finally able to talk openly with each other about the case. At this point the men sit in order of their juror number from one to 12 as directed by the jury foreman around the tables made available for them; this is the first stage of the group’s development. Stage two and three occurs when a juror then questions the leadership of juror number one and why he is the foreman. The foreman proceeds to acknowledge the valid complaint of the juror and offers the leadership position to him or any other juror that wants to be in charge. The juror that questioned the validity of the position recants and chooses to drop the issue and proceed with the task at hand. The foreman is the only individual of the group with any discernible status among the group; yet as a whole the 12 men are equals in the decision making process. After the leadership decision has been agreed upon the jurors then decide to make all decision by vote, at first by secret ballot, they then agree to raising hands to show agreement or not in any question which may arise. This process of decision making is effective, in that it has immediate results. The raising of the hands to vote is to expedite the process so that the men have an answer to the question at hand without the having to wait for the reading of the ballot which will allow them to continue in the deliberation process if needed.
From the first moment that the men started the process of discussing the decision they have to make, there is one that believes

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, Juror 4 undergoes a series of questions regarding his confidence that a young man is guilty of murder. From the beginning to the end of the play, Juror 4 gradually changes his mind about his initial vote, through the constructive discussions lead by Juror 8. Juror 4 moves from a belief that all legal witnesses are faultless to truly experiencing some sort of “reasonable doubt.” He is left with a clearer picture of the case, looking beyond his personal prejudices and biases.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the drama Twelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, there are twelve jurors to discuss and deliberate if the murder in the first degree is guilt or not. Because the verdict must be unanimous, twelve jurors have a critical thinking in their discussion and finally made the vote from eleven jurors vote for guilty to unanimous vote for not guilty. During the development of the voting, Juror Three is hardly to persuade because he has a serious prejudice to the murder. If Juror Three does not admit the murder is not guilty, they cannot settle a lawsuit. Therefore, Juror Three’s prejudice should be the key to get the final verdict.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Flaws

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Throughout the years of America, we had many juries during criminal trials to decide if the defendant guilty or not guilty. In the 1957 movie, 12 Angry Men shows the best representation of American jury system and how people change their minds. 12 Angry Men shows that personal feeling get in the way in their votes. The movie is about how 12 jurors decide the fate of young boy that persumed he killed his father, while during the initial vote only Juror 8 raised his hand not guilty. Then throughout the movie and script each of the 11 jurors for various reason change their votes to not guilty. The 12 jurors change their votes from guilty to not guilty through character flaws, positive personality traits, expertise on the evidence, and pattern of behavior.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Essay

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The movie "12 Angry Men" focuses on a jury's decision on a capital murder case. A 12-man jury is sent to begin decisions on the first-degree murder trial of an 18-year-old Latino accused of stabbing his father to death, where a guilty verdict means an automatic death sentence. The case appears to be open-and-shut: The defendant has a weak alibi; a knife he claimed to have lost is found at the murder scene; and several witnesses either heard screaming, saw the killing or the boy fleeing the scene. Eleven of the jurors immediately vote guilty; only Juror No. 8 (Mr. Davis) casts a not guilty vote. At first Mr. Davis' bases his vote more so for the sake of discussion after all, the jurors must believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty. As the movie unfolds, the story quickly becomes a study of the jurors' complex personalities and how they deal with argumentation within groups and critical thinking. This allows Mr. Davis to try and convince the other jury members that the defendant might not be guilty by using cooperative argumentation, claim, evidence, warrant, facts, etc.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 angry men

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Reginald Rose, the author of 12 Angry Men, writes his book using complex characters and word choice that effects their characterization. In the book 12 Angry Men Reginald Rose uses abrupt but cultured text is straightforward picturesque at the same time when talking about his characters. Roses denotation and connotation affects his characters and their attitudes throughout the entire book. When he explains his characters thoughts and actions it helps portray them differently from each other. In 12 Angry Men Rose portrays his characters several different ways. For instance he uses denotation to make some characters sarcastic and dry. Rose also portrays his characters as light hearted and playful when he uses connotation. His portrayals of each character are different but similar throughout the story. You can clearly see similarities between some characters as well as distinct differences in others due to Roses word choice. Roses denotation and connotation play a big part in the portrayal of each of his characters. When Rose uses connotation in his story he makes the word choices more cheerful and positive. But when Rose uses denotation in his story he takes a deeper darker path in his word choice. For instance when juror 3 says to juror 8, Let me go Ill kill him Ill kill him Rose is using denotation. Or when juror 3 says Shut up he is also using denotation. When I say Reginald Rose makes his word choice picturesque I mean he uses imagery. Reginald Rose also uses diction when describing his complex characters, thats what makes them so straight forward. The fact that each of Roses jurors has a different type of word choice gives them each a unique way of being portrayed. Each of Roses characters is also cultured. When I say cultured I mean that Rose has added some of his self into each of the characters. It seems that each character has some real world knowledge and street smarts and thats what makes them each similar to Rose. Overall Reginald Roses use of abrupt but…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve men, essentially strangers to each other, must decide the fate of this boy-did he let his rage take control in the murder of his father, or is he merely being taken in as the most convenient suspect. In the beginning of the book, the twelve jurors file out of the court room, giving last glances to the defendant. The scene shifts into the jury room, where they slowly settle into their seats under the direction of the over-organized foreman. At first, based on their conversation, it seems that it will be a unanimous conviction. But when they take a vote, a single man votes “not guilty.” In the furor that follows, the other jurors immediately begin questioning the man, not understanding how he could possibly think that way.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginad Rose the twelve jurors have to decide if a young boy is guilty or not guilty. The boy is accused of the murder of his father. His fate lies in the hands of the twelve jurors. Will he get the death penalty? Will they prove that the young boy is not guilty? Will he get to live the rest of his life? There are many different versions of this story including William Friedkins film version produced in 1997. Friedkins film version is easier to comprehend because it includes more detail than Rose’s original play version of Twelve Angry Men. Friedkin goes more in depth in his version of the story unlike Rose. Its more effective to the reader because of the message its telling us.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Josiah Bont- to what degree should he be excused given his own history of abuse (200 words)…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This was a meeting of 12 jurors to deliberate the fate of an eighteen year old boy. The meeting was more of a verbal structure. The jury foreman was the team leader of the meeting. I feel as though the beginning of the meeting started strong with his decision of voting for guilty or innocence that lead to a hung jury. There was no planning really or discussing the trial at the beginning, and the jurors did not work together in a timely manner. The presentation of evidence was to convince the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the teen was either guilty or innocent. A closer look at the evidence presented brought good points as to why the boy was innocent. The example in which the knife was used, the question being brought up about if the teen really lost the knife used to kill his father before going to the movies was even possible, or did he really even go to movies were all valid points that needed to be revisited. Also the demonstration of the elderly man being able to make it to the door in fifteen seconds to see if the person going down the stairs the man’s son or someone else clearly helped to head the meeting in a different direction. Along with the demonstration it was discovered that the elderly man would not have been able to hear clearly with the noise from noise from the L train. Most important of all was the question of the lady across the railroad tracks in another apartment really sees the murder take place while the L train was passing in ten seconds without her eyeglasses. All these points helped to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the boy was innocent. Finally all the jurors agreed on a not guilty plea and presented it to the judge.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men depicts different types of leadership, communication, and group dynamics. The film revolves around the jurisdiction of a homicide trial with a jury that almost unanimously votes the defendant guilty, with only one opposing voter. This man, Juror #8, presents his decision through ideas of reasonable doubt that spiral into a majority vote of not-guilty.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    An Argument where it is one versus eleven doesn’t seem to be fair does it. In Twelve Angry Men, a young boy from the slums is accused of stabbing his father. It is up to twelve men to decide his fate. Juror Eight was able to sway the vote because he connected with the other jurors on a personal level; he was very patient with everyone, listening to what they had to say, and used tangible evidence to recreate the crime scene itself in front of the twelve men. Because of Juror Eight’s denial of prejudiced beliefs and revolt against the status quo, he proves to be a hero throughout the play of Twelve Angry Men.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Twelve Angry Men

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men (1957) is a classic film where twelve strangers are brought together into a hot and humid New York jury room, to negotiate and decide on the fate of a poor, young Latino boy who is accused of killing his father (Lumet). These twelve jurors come from diverse backgrounds, and throughout the film exhibit behaviors that demonstrate their cultural, economic and social differences. In the beginning of the film, these dissimilar viewpoints, prejudices and biases become a barrier in their decision-making but as the film continues their conflicting personalities help to enrich the actions and decisions in the jury room, resulting in a unanimous not guilty verdict.…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 2478 Words
    • 7 Pages

    12 Angry Men is an American drama film written and co-produced by Rose himself and directed by Sidney Lumet in 1957. Movie tells the story of a jury made up of 12 men as they on purpose the guilt or discharge of the defendant on the basis of reasonable doubt. 12 Angry Men explores many techniques of agreement building, and the difficulties encountered in the process, among a group of men whose range of personalities adds intensity and conflict. No names are used in the film: the jury members are identified by number until two of them exchange names at the very end; the defendant is referred to as "the boy", and the witnesses as "the old man" and "the lady across the street".…

    • 2478 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages

    [Multiple Choice] Question The glass fiber cables that make up much of the physical backbone of the data highway are, in many cases, owned by: Answer 1) Local governments 2) Howard Johnson 3) Television networks -4) Railroads and pipeline companies 5) Book publishers…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 angry men

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Through our discussion, we decided to choose proposed dabate1, 2 & 6. Following are our responses for these questions.…

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics