Judicial Precedent Judicial precedent is the process whereby judges follow previously decided cases where the facts or point of law are sufficiently similar. It involves the following principles: First‚ stare decisis‚ which means to stand by the decided‚ whereby lower courts are bound to apply the legal principles set down by superior courts in earlier cases and appellate courts follow their own previous decisions. For example: The High Court must follow decisions of the Court of Appeal
Premium Stare decisis Case law Precedent
Judicial precedent: A judgment of a court of law cited as an authority for deciding a similar set of facts; a case which serves as authority for the legal principle embodied in its decision. The common law has developed by broadening down from precedent to precedent. A judicial precedent is a decision of the court used as a source for future decision making. This is known as stare decisis (to stand upon decisions) and by which precedents are authoritative and binding and must be followed. In giving
Free Common law Precedent Stare decisis
Introduction: Judicial precedent means the process whereby judges follow previously decided cases where the facts are of sufficient similarity. The doctrine of judicial precedent involves an application of the principle of stare decisis ie‚ to stand by the decided. In practice‚ this means that inferior courts are bound to apply the legal principles set down by superior courts in earlier cases. This provides consistency and predictability in the law.
Premium Stare decisis Precedent Common law
Judicial Process and Politics Interest Groups - Lawyers‚ Litigants‚ Trade Associations and Bar Associations Week 5 Case Western Reserve University Department of Political Science POSC 323/423 Spring 2012 Expository Essays Expository essay requires the writer to investigate an idea‚ evaluate evidence‚ expound on the idea‚ and set forth an argument concerning that idea in a clear and concise manner. Tools for expository writing: • comparison and contrast; • definition; • example; or • analysis
Premium Valentine's Day Writing Law
The judicial restraint theory is based off the idea that judges should limit the exercise of their own power. For example‚ it would make judges think before shooting down laws‚ just because they can‚ with the exception being that they are unconstitutional. The opposite of judicial restraint is judicial activism. Judicial activism is when judges make rulings based on politics or personal beliefs rather than the law itself. The main difference between these two philosophies is judicial restraint is
Premium Law Ethics Political philosophy
States Constitution is the supreme law if the land‚ produced by our founding fathers more than 200 years ago. However‚ since the era of Presidents Washington and Jefferson is gone‚ many things have lost it is original intent‚ specifically the subject of the judicial review system‚ better known as judicial activism. The original intent of the Supreme Court was to accurately define what the law is. Meaning‚ that judges act as interpreters of the law‚ when the legal philosophy‚ or its application‚ is
Premium United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States United States
system promotes equal access to justice for all (Vines 2013‚ p. 319). As significant figures of the judicial system‚ judges must ensure that courts are independent‚ impartial‚ open and transparent and provides a fair and prompt trial (Rule of Law Institute of Australia 2015). This could be an issue with indeterminate sentencing
Premium Law Crime Criminal law
In our country‚ the Supreme Court holds a great deal of power being the highest form of a court in the United States. It has the final say in a court dispute or disagreement about a law brought through a lawsuit. The Constitution does not explicitly say that there has to be a Supreme Court‚ it was basically just created in 1789 when the Supreme Court got the power of Judicial Review out of the blue in a sense. Congress however‚ decides in which way the Supreme Court is constructed. In the beginning
Premium United States President of the United States United States Constitution
land are based on the Westminster system which looks at the three branches of the State‚ the Executive‚ Parliament and the Judiciary. The function of each of these branches is clearly articulated in the country’s written Constitution‚ which is the supreme law of the land. According to Article 38 of the Constitution‚ “there shall be a Parliament of The Bahamas which shall consist of Her Majesty‚ a Senate and a House of Assembly”. Pursuant to Article 52 (1) of the Constitution‚ “Parliament may make
Premium Law Court Appeal
2003 edition. 2. Sathe‚ S.P.‚ Judicial Activism in India: Transgressing Borders and Enforcing Limits‚ Oxford University Press‚ 2005 edition. 3. Bag‚ R.K.‚ “Judicial Activism vis-à-vis Public Administration”‚ Administrator‚ Vol. XLII‚ April-June‚ p.167. 4. Bhattacharjee‚ G.R.‚ “Judicial Activism: Its Message for Administrators”‚ The Administrator; Vol. XLII‚ April-June 1997‚ p.31. 5. Bhattacharyya‚ R.‚ “Judicial Activism: The Motive Force of Public Administration”‚ Administrator‚ Vol. XLII
Premium Separation of powers Management Governance