• Deductive “Deductive reasoning is a basic form of valid reasoning. Deductive reasoning‚ or deduction‚ starts out with a general statement‚ or hypothesis‚ and examines the possibilities to reach a specific‚ logical conclusion”. • Inductive “refers to reasoning that takes specific information and makes a broader generalization that is considered probable‚ allowing for the fact that the conclusion may not be accurate. 2. Elaborate In other words deductive reasoning works from more general
Premium Scientific method Deductive reasoning Reasoning
Provide an example in which you can use deductive reasoning to draw a conclusion. State the axioms or premises used to reach the conclusion. Karen knows if she misses cheerleading practice the day before a game that she will not be able to cheer at the game. Karen misses practice on Tuesday‚ the day before the game. Karen was not allowed to cheer at Wednesday’s game. Deductive Reasoning: (Premises) Fact: Karen knows if she misses cheerleading practice the day before a game she will not
Premium Logic Reasoning Inductive reasoning
CHAPTER ONE DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE APPROACHES – A SHORT REVIEW 1.1. Definitions and names When it comes to teaching grammar two main trends have been competing with one another for ages‚ these are: deductive and inductive approaches. While the first one seems to be more successful as it has continuously been applied since ancient times‚ the other was appreciated only in Classical‚ Reneissance‚ 19th and 20th century (Johnson‚ 1999‚ p. 147). However‚ it seems to have gained real popularity
Premium Language acquisition Linguistics Universal grammar
OPPOSITION BETWEEN DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE TECHNIQUES Students have different learning skills and capacities for getting to know about shown and told knowledge. To teach something effectively ‚ we have many techniques used while educating. So‚ during the teaching process teachers use different methods to school effectively. Two of them are deductive and inductive techniqe. Both of them have adventages but they are completely different from each other with the dominant people‚ flowing of information
Free Education Teacher
Discussion 1 Deductive Language Construct a deductive argument that is valid but not sound. Then‚ construct a valid deductive argument that is sound. Be sure to put the argument in premise-conclusion form. Discussion 2 Inductive Language Construct an inductive argument for a specific conclusion. Then‚ explain what you might do to make this inductive argument stronger‚ either by revising the premises or by revising the conclusion. Week 1 Discussion 1 Consider an argument you have
Premium Logic Argument Inductive reasoning
Compare and contrast deductive and inductive arguments There are two types of arguments: deductive and inductive. In a deductive argument‚ provided the premises are true‚ the conclusion is certainly true. For example: All ducks are birds (premise). Daffy is a duck (premise). Therefore‚ Daffy is a bird (conclusion). Deductive arguments are used by rationalists‚ because they use reason rather than experience‚ and provide certainty rather than probability. Deductive arguments are most used in the
Free Logic Inductive reasoning Deductive reasoning
Define the following terms‚ commenting on their importance. 1) Disadvantage and advantage of a deductive approach to grammar teaching. A deductive approach starts with the presentation of a rule and is followed by examples in which the rule is applied. It is also called rule-driven learning. There are several disadvantages and advantages of this approach. As for the disadvantages‚ starting the lesson with a grammar presentation may be off-putting for some students‚ especially younger ones
Premium Education Educational psychology Linguistics
9-17-13 Two forms of argument 1) Deductive= provides logically conclusive spport for the conclusion Valid-if the premises are true then the conclusion cannot be false Invalid- it fail to provide support Sound-the argument is valid and the premises are all true Unsound- an argument with true premises that lead to a false conclusion 2) Inductive-provides probable support for the conclusion Strong-premises are true conclusion is probably true cogent-premises are true argument is strong Weak-in
Premium Logic Argument
A mother and daughter are fighting and they both refuse to talk to each other while brother runs way because he has let his father down or‚ a boss hitting on his or her employees. These are the different types of relationships every human bean can connect to one of these scenarios. As people meet new people he or she grows by different relationships like parents and children‚ friendship‚ teacher and student‚ business‚ and also monogamist. Parents and children tend to fuss and fight
Premium Interpersonal relationship Mother Friendship
that these two arguments each have the same logical pattern or form: If A then B. A. Therefore‚ B. This pattern‚ as we have seen‚ is called modus ponens. Arguments with this pattern consist of one conditional premise‚ a second premise that asserts as true the antecedent (the if part) of the conditional‚ and a conclusion that asserts as true the consequent (the then part) of the conditional. Other common varieties of hypothetical syllogisms include • chain argument • modus
Free Logic