What Facts May Weigh In Favor Of Or Against Chou In Terms Of The Parties Objective Intent To Contract Essays and Term Papers

  • Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker - Law421

    America, Chou is the inventor of a new strategy game he calls Strat. BTT had an interest in distributing Strat and entered into an agreement with Chou, offering him $25,000 in exchange for exclusive negotiation rights for a 90-day period. This agreement stipulated that no distribution contract existed...

    Premium | 2098 Words | 6 Pages

  • Big Time Toy Maker

    Time Toymaker At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? Chou and BTT had a contract at the point they agreed to all the terms. By including the obligations of the parties and the terms of the agreement, the manager showed objective intent. A written contract was not necessary since...

    Premium | 908 Words | 3 Pages

  • Theory to Practices

    Theory to Practice 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? The proposed contract existed immediately following the agreement to exclusive rights. The contract from that point was valid for 90 days following the agreement, which blocked Chou’s ability to negotiate with other...

    Premium | 940 Words | 3 Pages

  • Law421 Casescenario Bigtimetoymaker

    1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? The contract was established at the in-person meeting where the distribution agreement details were agreed upon. The fact that Chou was going to reiterate the details in writing is not required. The manager emailing the same agreed upon...

    Premium | 551 Words | 2 Pages

  • Big Time Toymaker Scenario

    (BTT) and Chou the game inventor. In the scenario, Chou invents a strategy game titled Strat. The scenario follows the events as BTT and Chou negotiate the potential distribution of Strat, ending with BTT declining to distribute the game. The legal issues presented are as follows: At what point, if...

    Premium | 937 Words | 3 Pages

  • LAW 421 Theory to Practice

    Theory to Practice Questions 1. At one point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? The parties had a contract when they agreed on the key terms of the distribution contract. The first agreement was a 90-day negotiation agreement and the second was an oral distribution agreement in a meeting prior...

    Premium | 772 Words | 3 Pages

  • Toymaker Law/421

    BTT and Chou have a contract, and BTT has breached the contract by not distributing the game, discuss what remedies might or might not apply. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? I do not believe that the parties ever had a contract. The scenario stated that the parties reached...

    Premium | 974 Words | 3 Pages

  • Big Time Toy Maker

    421 May, 5, 2014 University of Phoenix Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? Our textbook defines a contract as “a promise or a set of promises enforceable by law” (). A contract does not necessarily has to be in writing. A contract can...

    Premium | 473 Words | 3 Pages

  • Essay

     Big Time Toymaker LAW/421 May 20, 2014 Aileen S. Azadian Question 1 At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? Answer: Big Time Toymaker and Chou had an oral contract. In a meeting that included Big Time Toymaker and Chou an agreement was reached. Additionally, an...

    Premium | 534 Words | 4 Pages

  • pepsi

    Hernandez LAW/421 11/6/13 Cory Chartrand Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? Response #1 Yes, a contract did exist within the framework presented under Mutual assent. First, the point in which the BTT manager sent...

    Premium | 1188 Words | 4 Pages

  • Big Time Toymaker

    At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? I found that the only actual agreement between the two parties was at the very beginning. The agreement that BTT paid $25,000 to Chou for exclusive negotiation rights ended after the 90-day period. After this there was no actual contract. There...

    Premium | 710 Words | 3 Pages

  • Bigtoymaker Law421

    1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? The two parties, BTT and Chou entered into a contract when an oral agreement was made. In addition to the oral agreement, an email was sent later from BTT to Chou summarizing and capturing their agreement around time frames, price and party...

    Premium | 786 Words | 3 Pages

  • Big Time Toy Maker

    include the following in our response: 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? My Answer: When both parties agreed Big Time Toymaker (BTT) and Chou agreed to the terms, obligations, which covered intent, and followed through when BTT paid Chou $25,000 in exchange for exclusive negotiation...

    Premium | 855 Words | 5 Pages

  • Uop Law 421 Week 4 Individual

    1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? The parties had a contract when they spoke of and agreed on the deal that was later followed up by a BTT manager via email. 2. What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of the partiesobjective intent to contract? The...

    Premium | 452 Words | 2 Pages

  • Law. Big Time Toymaker

    Big Time Toymaker 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? According to the scenario, both Big Time Toymaker and Chou did partake in an oral contract. During the meeting both parties reached an oral distribution agreement, and a confirmation of the terms of the agreement was sent...

    Premium | 328 Words | 2 Pages

  • Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker

    other toys globally, entered into an agreement with Chou, an independent inventor of a new strategy game he name Strat, to distribute this new game. However, over more than a 90-day period, BTT reneged on the agreement and was in breach of contract stating BTT were no longer interested in distributing...

    Premium | 1243 Words | 4 Pages

  • Big Time Toy-maker

    Toy-maker 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? The parties had an oral contract when all parties met. 2. What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of the partiesobjective intent to contract? One factor is that both parties agreed with an oral contract. Unfortunately...

    Premium | 263 Words | 1 Pages

  • law421 Week 4 ind assignment

    Assuming BTT and Chou have a contract, and BTT has breached the contract by not distributing the game, discuss what remedies might or might not apply. Explain your answers and refer to Section 7-6 in Ch. 7 for support. Submit your answers. Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker 1. At what point, if ever...

    Premium | 1026 Words | 4 Pages

  • Big Time

    Big Time Toymaker 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? 2. The scenario states the parties had reached an agreement 3 days prior to the end of a 90 day deadline which was set in the original negotiation contact. The original negotiation contract, it describes there would be...

    Premium | 272 Words | 3 Pages

  • Big Time Toymaker Case Scenario

    Scenario LAW/421 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? I do not think the two parties involved ever had a contract. In the scenario, the parties reached an agreement only three days before the end of a 90-day deadline set in the original negotiation contract. In the original negotiation...

    Premium | 722 Words | 2 Pages