• Exclusionary Rule Pros and Cons
    The reason we have rules in life are simple, to keep order when there is chaos and to guide our behavior in a way that is acceptable by society’s standards. The reason we have laws and procedures to carry out those laws are simple as well, to keep the government from infringing on its citizen’s constitutional...
    Premium 1962 Words 6 Pages
  • Pros and Cons of the Exclusionary Rule
    ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE Among the arguments in support of the exclusionary rule4 by its proponents are the following: 1. It deters violations of constitutional rights by police and prosecutors. A number of studies and testimonies by police officers support this contention. 2...
    Premium 1524 Words 4 Pages
  • Exclusionary Rule
    Abstract The Exclusionary Rule is a very important part of the criminal justice system. It maintains a check to make sure that all evidence is legally obtained throughout the investigative process. Evidence not legally obtained should be barred from court proceedings and not used against a defendant. ...
    Premium 858 Words 3 Pages
  • On the Ligitimacy of the Exclusionary Rule
    proposition that the exclusionary rule should be abolished is absolutely preposterous. In fact, there are few rules that are as useful in protecting the rights of the general public. Unfortunately, there are many who believe, for a number of reasons, that the exclusionary rule does more harm than good...
    Premium 2174 Words 6 Pages
  • Representation
    points) Affirmative Action is an equal opportunity for employment, and it prevents discrimination against employees based on their color, race, religion or sex. A) Provide two strong arguments in support of affirmative action (10 points) 1. The United States has become more diverse than other...
    Premium 597 Words 2 Pages
  • Exclusionary Rule-Con
    let free every second? The exclusionary rule prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal trail. There are many exclusions to the rule, which brings up the question of why the rule should even be carried out in the first place. Since the exclusionary rule is not stated in the constitution...
    Premium 494 Words 2 Pages
  • Criminal Procedure Case Briefs
    The Birth of the Exclusionary Rule * Exclusionary Rule – Evidence obtained in violation of the 4th amendment must be excluded at trial. Weeks v. United States SCOTUS, 1914 232 U.S. 383, 34 S.Ct. 341, 58 L.Ed. 652 Facts: Police entered the home of Weeks without a warrant and seized papers...
    Premium 2132 Words 7 Pages
  • Exclusionary Rule Analysis - Judicial Integrity
    CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Justice Ginsburg’s dissent in Herring v. United States suggested there is more to the exclusionary rule than just deterring police misconduct.[1] She explained that the rule was an “essential auxiliary” to the Fourth Amendment right, which is owed “a more majestic conception” due...
    Premium 12248 Words 34 Pages
  • Exclusionary Rule
    What is the Exclusionary Rule and Why is it Important A rule that provides that otherwise admissible evidence cannot be used in a criminal trial if it was the result of illegal police conduct The exclusionary rule should not be abolished because it is needed to protect suspected criminals from over-zealous...
    Premium 572 Words 2 Pages
  • Gonza; Ez
    ever was any warrant for the search of defendant's home." 170 Ohio St., at 430, 166 N. E. 2d, at 389. The Ohio Supreme Court believed a "reasonable argument" could be made that the conviction should be reversed "because the `methods' employed to obtain the [evidence] . . . were such as to `offend "a sense...
    Premium 14687 Words 41 Pages
  • The |Exclusionary Rule
    THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE The exclusionary rule is a judge-made rule, adopted by the courts to stop the police from conducting illegal searches and seizures. The constitution merely says the people shall be free from unreasonable searches. It doesn't say what the courts should do once an unreasonable search...
    Premium 2155 Words 6 Pages
  • Mapps vs Ohio
    The case of Mapp vs. Ohio is one of the most important Supreme Court decisions of the last century. Until this decision, the rights against illegal search and seizure had no method to be enforced. Up until this time, previous cases at set precedents provided little or no protection from illegal searches...
    Premium 1186 Words 3 Pages
  • Victim's Rights
    consists of efforts to secure more certain and harsher punishment for perpetrators, including restricting pretrial release, free admission of evidence against the accused, and tougher sentencing practices. In these efforts, victims frequently become the allies of prosecutorial and political forces that support...
    Premium 1335 Words 4 Pages
  • Case 2
    1. What is the story behind the controversy before the Court (basic facts of the case)? a.       (Basic Facts of Story) Police officers thought Miss Mapp was harboring a fugitive, which was wanted for questioning in connection with a bombing. The officers knocked on the door and demanded entrance...
    Premium 917 Words 3 Pages
  • Midterm Essay Examination History 368
    certain jurors were dismissed that might have been biased against Gideon. The lawyer was the one who really won Gideon trial for him. His lawyer was able to pull facts from Gideon about the case and Gideon was able to give specific details about what happened the night that he was accused of breaking into...
    Premium 2517 Words 7 Pages
  • World Civilization
    refer to the "Assignment Format" page for specific format requirements. According to your textbook, what are the four factors used in determining if an area is an open field or curtilage? (40 points) What 1987 U.S. Supreme Court case ruled on this issue? (10 points) Discuss whether items in open fields...
    Premium 4404 Words 28 Pages
  • Economic Loss
    Steel v Martin (1973) QB 27 Like psychiatric injury, pure economic loss is often described as a problematic form of damage. Although floodgates arguments are sometimes encountered in this area, there are other reasons why a duty to take care not to cause foreseeable economic loss to the claimant is...
    Premium 6042 Words 17 Pages
  • Evidence: Some Basic Terms
    is presented at trial is understanding how evidence is defined. Knowledge of the rules governing evidence is also essential. This paper introduces several basic but key terms, with particular emphasis on the Federal Rules of Evidence. These definitions should in nowise be construed as complete or authoritative...
    Premium 3629 Words 11 Pages
  • Mapp V. Ohio
    maintained that the evidence was illegally obtained and must also be excluded. In its ruling, the Supreme Court of Ohio recognized that "a reasonable argument" could be made that the conviction should be reversed "because the ‘methods' employed to obtain the evidence…were such as to offend a sense of justice...
    Premium 1416 Words 4 Pages
  • Constitutionality vs. Safety
    be searched, and the evidence to be gathered were all named so as to protect an individual’s liberty and right to privacy. Despite his strong legal argument, Otis lost the case, which in turn sparked great anger in the colonies and was one of the factors leading to the revolutionary war. Mr. Otis’s oration…...
    Premium 4994 Words 13 Pages