Strict Loose Interpretation Constitution Madison Jefferson Essays and Term Papers

  • Interpreting the Constitution (Strict vs. Loose); Jefferson and Hamilt

    When the Federalist party was organized in 1791, those people who favored a strong central government and a loose constitutional interpretation coagulated and followed the ideals of men such as Alexander Hamilton. The first opposition political party in the United States was the Republican party, which...

    1897 Words | 6 Pages

  • Ap American Dbq Strict and Loose Constructionists, Jefferson and Madison Presidencies

    presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, the characterization of Jeffersonian Republicans as strict constructionists and Federalists as loose constructionists was generally true for the most part. While both Presidents were Democratic-Republicans and often adopted a strict constructionist view...

    1030 Words | 3 Pages

  • This essay is on Strict vs. Loose construction during the presidencies of Madison and Jefferson

    newly ratified Constitution, there were two main political parties in existence, the Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans. From the time period of 1801-1817, the two presidents that were elected to rule the U.S. were Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. Both Jefferson and Madison were Jeffersonian...

    1158 Words | 4 Pages

  • Loose and Strict Constructionist of the Constitution

    Republicans are usually characterized as strict constructionists. With respect to the federal Constitution, Jeffersonian Republicans are for the “strictinterpretation of the Constitution, while the Federalist Party and its supporters are in favor of the “looseinterpretation. However, during the period of...

    633 Words | 2 Pages

  • Loose and Broad Interpretation of the Constitution

    thought to have a loose interpretation of the Constitution through the Elastic Clause. Onthe other hand, the Jeffersonian Republican party maintained that the states should retain the power and thought that the Elastic clause allowed the national govt too much power. They were know as the strict constructionists...

    572 Words | 2 Pages

  • The Importance of a Strict Interpretation of the Constitution

    2013 Thesis Finale The Founding Fathers of the United States created a masterpiece. They were able to create a government held together by a Constitution that was run by the people, and was also able to keep the government in check by building a system that was able to change with time. The Founding...

    2871 Words | 8 Pages

  • Should the Interpretation of Law Be Strict or Loose?

    Should the interpretation of law be strict or loose? Law can be understood differently by a different variety of people who apply if different whether it’s strictly, loosely and everything in between. I believe that the interpretation of law shouldn’t be really strict, but shouldn’t be very loose at the...

    732 Words | 2 Pages

  • Jefferson and Madison

    were greatly opposed to one another. Democratic Republicans were strict constructionists and Federalists were loose constructionists. Although these two parties’ policies were extremely different, both Thomas Jefferson and James Madison presidencies would be defined by Federalist policies, even though...

    456 Words | 2 Pages

  • Loose And Strict Constructionism

    Loose and Strict Constructionism The Republicans Jefferson and Madison, and the Federalists, mainly Hamilton, hated each other. They constantly fought over power of the U.S., and were classified into two groups, Republicans were strict and Federalists were loose constructionists. This was a fairly accurate...

    564 Words | 2 Pages

  • Loose/Strict Dbq

    Loose/Strict Constructionist DBQ By both definition and widespread perception the Jeffersonian-Republicans were strict constructionists, meaning they closely followed the framework of the Constitution. On the other hand, the belief was that Federalists, who thought the Constitution was open for interpretation...

    797 Words | 3 Pages

  • Loose vs. Strict Constructionist

    Loose Constructionist v. Strict Constructionist Interpretation of the Constitution The debate over how much power a government should employ over its citizens has been issue in the United States, since its first development of government. This clash of views essentially led to the formation of political...

    863 Words | 3 Pages

  • Thomas Jefferson and James Madison's views on the interpretation of the Constitution (DBQ)

    opinions between Thomas Jefferson and James Madison on the policies of the interpretation of the Constitution. It is generally believed that Thomas Jefferson felt that there should be strict and inflexible interpretation of the Constitution, while James Madison felt that the Constitution was elastic and that...

    605 Words | 2 Pages

  • Loose And Strict Constructionism

    The Republicans Jefferson and Madison, and the Federalists, mainly Hamilton, hated each other. They constantly fought over power of the U.S., and were classified into two groups, Republicans were strict and Federalists were loose constructionists. This was a fairly accurate statement most of the time...

    560 Words | 2 Pages

  • Interpretation of the Constitution

    Interpretation of the Constitution Thomas Jefferson’s (president through 1801-09) political party, the Jeffersonian Republicans, believed in a strict interpretation of the Constitution, while Jefferson’s opposing party, the Federalists, believed in a loose interpretation of the Constitution. In order...

    1004 Words | 3 Pages

  • Jefferson and Madison DBQ

    Thomas Jefferson and James Madison and was characterized as strict constructionist, which meant that members believed that the constitution should be interpreted by what was written. The ideas of the Democratic-Republicans were opposed to those of the Federalist who believed in loose interpretation. Both...

    945 Words | 3 Pages

  • Jefferson and Madison and Federalism

    16 years of Thomas Jefferson as president for two terms and James Madison as president for two terms. Jefferson and Madison were members of the Republican Party, which had principles and philosophies that were very different than the views of the Federalists. Jefferson and Madison each abandoned the...

    934 Words | 3 Pages

  • Jefferson vs. Madison

    During the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison, Republicans, such as Jefferson were seen as strict constructionists of the Constitution while Federalists, like Madison, were generally looser with their interpretations of the Constitution's literal meaning. While the constructionist ideas were part...

    1044 Words | 3 Pages

  • Constructionists Jefferson & Madison

    presidencies in 1800's of Jefferson and Madison their characterized views as strict constructionists were opposed to the broad constructionist of the Federalists. Jefferson, who after all argument between Hamilton brought the beginning of the two political parties, believed in strict Constitution, was not able to...

    469 Words | 2 Pages

  • Madison v Jefferson Constructionists

    met and the United States constitution was written all of the delegates, at that time, was considered federalists. By the time John Adams was out of presidential office in 1801 two distinct parties had emerged and their opposing views on the interpretation of the constitution were vastly different. At...

    754 Words | 2 Pages

  • jefferson vs madison

    Republicans are characterized by a strict interpretation of the Constitution, and Federalists are characterized by a loose interpretation, these characteristics were false in regards to the party's views on governmental authority during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison, during which time the Jeffersonians...

    498 Words | 2 Pages