and Management in SEA Case Analysis: Nora-Sakari: A Proposed Joint Venture In Malaysia Submission date: 03.03.2004 Nanyang Technological University CONTENTS: ___________________________________________________________________________ Introduction 1 Cultural differences 2 Relationship-Focus vs. Deal Focus 2 Formal vs. Informal 4 Time and Scheduling- Monochromic vs. Polychronic 5 Why Nora should contact Kuusisto in Helsinki. 6 Why shouldn’t Nora contact Kuusisto in Helsinki? 9 Conclusion
Premium Negotiation Joint venture Finland
has more than one solution‚ the question of whether or not a joint venture between Sakari and Nora would be the best option for either of the companies is difficult to assess. However‚ there are certain benefits‚ which are mentioned in the case‚ that clearly outline the initial motivation for forming the join venture. From the Sakari side‚ the motivation came in the form of a new market in Southeast Asia‚ while Nora was motivated by Sakari’s telecom technology and the possibility of acquiring it and/or
Premium Joint venture Negotiation Southeast Asia
Nora Sakari case analysis 1. Why have the negotiations so far failed to result in an agreement? Is the formation of the JV between Nora and Sakari the best option for both companies to achieve their respective objectives? Ans. Part 1: Negotiations to date between Nora and Sakari have failed mainly due to a mutual ignorance of one another’s cultural norms. One of the key reasons for failed to result in an agreement is that there is huge gap between what Nora and Sakari can sacrifice
Premium Joint venture Negotiation Dispute resolution
Tatevik Ghapantsyan AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA 5/24/2012 BUSINESS STRATEGY Nora-Sakari: A proposed JV in Malaysia Nora-Sakari: A proposed JV in Malaysia 1. Why have the negotiations so far failed to result in an agreement? Is the formation of the JV between Nora and Sakari the best option for both companies to achieve their respective objectives? The JV between Nora and Sakari was offered by Nora‚ Malaysian company which had already got the government order for providing 800‚000
Premium Negotiation
Nora Holdings Sdn Bhd Memo To: Zainal Hashim‚ Vice Chairman of Nora Holdings Sdn Bhd From: Caterina Barraco‚ Consultant Date: July 13‚ 1992 Re: Joint Venture Recommendation To ensure compliance with the terms of the TMB contract‚ joint venture negotiations with Sakari must be successfully concluded. Negotiations to date have failed mainly due to a mutual ignorance of one another’s cultural norms‚ not as a reflection of the potential success of a Nora-Sakari joint venture. The following
Premium Royalties Copyright Negotiation
Nora-Sakari Case Analysis Introduction The Nora-Sakari: A proposed JV in Malaysia set in 2003‚ focuses on the possible joint venture between Nora Holdings Sdn Bhd‚ a leading supplier of telecommunications equipment which is based in Malaysia‚ and Sakari Oy‚ a Finnish conglomerate‚ which was a leader in the manufacturing of cellular phones and switching systems from Finland. Nora as well as Sakari was part of a group of seven companies that submitted a five year bid outlined by Malaysia’s national
Premium Negotiation Mediation Contract
Nora - Sakari Introduction This case is about Nora‚ one of the leading suppliers of telecom solutions in Malaysia. The case involves a possible joint venture with Sakari‚ the leading manufacturer in Finland of mobile phones and telecom systems. There is a large potential in the future development of telecom facilities in Malaysia and the to enterprises have discussed a joint venture About Nora Nora is a leading supplier of telecommunication services in Malaysia. They are looking for a Joint
Premium Joint venture
far failed to result in an agreement? Is the formation of the JV between Nora and Sakari the best option for both companies to achieve their respective objectives? 2.As Zainal‚ what would you do to ensure that Nora fulfills the TMB contract? This case details the negotiations for a joint venture between Nora Holdings Sdn Bhd in Malaysia and Sakari Oy based in Finland. Nora is known in Malaysia as the leading telecom company and Sakari is known in Finland as a leading manufacturer of switching systems
Premium Joint venture Negotiation Finland
Nora-Sakari Case Study Introduction: Nora and Sakari are considering a joint venture to build digital switching exchanges for the telecom industry in Malaysia‚ Indonesia‚ and Thailand. Nora is a Malaysian telecom company that is looking to become a technology leader in South-east Asia. Sakari on the other hand is a Finish company that is considering expanding its operations in south-east Asian market and is looking for partners for this reason. They are a high Technology company and the
Premium Southeast Asia Asia Philippines
and drawbacks of reconciling with Sakari? There are both benefits and drawbacks of reconciling with Sakari for Nora. The benefits are was follows. First‚ Nora was motivated by Sakari’s advanced technology and the possibility of acquiring it and replicating it in the future. Nora was interested in securing a share of the contract from TMB‚ as well as the technology to switch from telecom. Second‚ Compared to other larger size multinational companies‚ Sakari was prepared to work out customized
Premium Negotiation Contract The Culture