Legal Environment of Business Legal Brief State of Oklahoma‚ ) ) Plaintiff‚ ) ) v. ) Case No. 06-2323-02-NBA ) Alexandra Anderson ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________) BRIEF IN REGARDS TO DEFENDANT KNOWINGLY RECEIvING STOLEN GOODS FACTS OF THE CASE On September 11th‚2012 Alexandra Anderson made an appointment for September 15th‚ 2012 with the Apple Genius Bar at their Woodland Hills location in Tulsa‚ Oklahoma. On September
Premium Apple Store Evidence Gun
Student Name: Angela M. Williams Class: Law 103/Legal Research – Mon./Wed. Date Due: 02/23/09 Date Submitted: same Project: Case Brief I Project Palmore v. Sidoti Possible Points: 25 Points Received: Palmore v. Sidoti‚ 466 U.S. 429‚ 104 S. Ct. 1879‚ 80 L. Ed. 2d 421 (1984) Facts: 1) Petitioner Linda Sidoti-Palmore and respondent Anthony J. Sidoti divorced
Premium United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States United States
Legal Brief Facts summary Mr. Potbelly holds a garage sale at his home. Mr. Slim Jim stops by the sale and upon noticing a rare piece of art pottery offers a price of $100 for the art that is marked $250. Mr. Potbelly accepts Mr. Slim Jim’s offer. Mr. Potbelly informs Mr. Slim Jim he is selling his home because he is moving up north because he has lost his job. Mr. Slim Jim asks how much he is selling it for and Mr. Potbelly informs him he is thinking $75‚000. Mr. Slim Jim offers him $70‚000
Premium Contract
United States V McClatchey 217 F3d 823 Cir.‚ (10th ‚ 2000) I. Background This case of U.S government versus defendant McClatchey involves hospital CEO‚ two physicians‚ and Mr. McClatchy who is a part of the administrative staff at Baptist Medical center. Two physicians involved in the case worked together in a group practice called BVMG that provided care to the nursing homes. In 1984‚ they brought a proposal to the Baptist Medical Center to have them buy the practice and in return physicians
Premium Jury Physician
Elk Grove Unified School District et al. v. Newdow et al. 542 U.S. 1 (2004) Facts: In 1954‚ Congress amended Title 36 of the United States Code by adding “under God” to the Pledge of Allegiance. California Education Code section 52720 requires appropriate patriotic exercises to be practiced in every public elementary school every day. Elk Grove Unified School District’s policy required the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance every day pursuant to section 52720 of the California Education Code
Free Supreme Court of the United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution Pledge of Allegiance
Legal Brief: Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders Facts: • Pennsylvania State Police hired Nancy Drew Suders as a police communications operator. • Suder’s supervisors were Sergeant Eric D. Easton‚ Patrol Corporal William D. Baker‚ and Corporal Eric B. Prendergast. • Suders was subject to sexual harassment from all three of her supervisors during the term of her employment. • Easton would mention the subject of people having sex with animals each time Suders entered the office. • Easton told
Premium Employment Termination of employment Supreme Court of the United States
Cristy Kirwin Professor Linda Ashar February 17‚ 2013 Unit 3 Assignment Drafting a Brief Gonzalez v. Reno‚ 212 F. 3rd 1338 (11th Cir)‚ Cert. denied 530 U.S. 1270(2000) Facts: Plaintiff is a minor alien‚ the sole survivor of a tragedy at sea‚ was rescued and placed in the care of his great uncle‚ Plaintiff temporary legal custodian‚ who filed asylum application on the minor’s behalf against the fathers wishes. This application was rejected by the Immigration and Naturalization
Free United States Appeal Supreme Court of the United States
Bill of Rights: Tinker Case Review What is the Tinker Standard and how does it affect schools today? The Tinker Standard describes the right of a student has to exercise freedom of speech through symbolic gestures. It was first conceived when students Mary Beth Tinker and John Tinker began wearing black armbands with the “peace” symbol as a form of passive protest against the war in Vietnam‚ a very controversial topic at the time. When the staff of the school they attended suspended them for
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
El Plan de Santa Barbara‚ 1969 Manifesto For all peoples‚ as with individuals‚ the time comes when they must reckon with their history. For the Chicano the present is a time of renaissance‚ of renacimiento. Our people and our community‚ el barrio and la colonia‚ are expressing a new consciousness and a new resolve. Recognizing the historical tasks confronting our people and fully aware of the cost of human progress‚ we pledge our will to move. We will move forward toward our destiny as
Premium Mexican American Consciousness
Citation: Babine v. Gilley’s Bronco Shop‚ Inc. District Court of Appeal of Florida‚ First District May 13‚ 1986 Facts: The appellant‚ Michael P. Babine brought suit against Gilley’s Bronco Shop‚ Inc. damages from injuries sustained at Kevin’s West‚ Inc. a nightclub‚ where he was thrown off the mechanical bull “El Toro”. The mechanical bull was sold to Kevin’s from Gilley’s. Gilley’s purchased it from another party. The purpose of the mechanical bull was for training rodeo cowboys. The appellant
Premium Tort Tort law Law