Judith Jarvis Thompson and Don Marquis both have markedly different views on the topic of abortion. Thompson generally argues that there are cases where abortion may be morally permissible‚ due to the rights of the mother‚ while Marquis argues that abortion is almost always morally wrong‚ except under extraordinary circumstances‚ because the fetus has a future life. In this paper‚ I will evaluate the arguments of both parties‚ as well as identify what premises‚ if any‚ they both agree on. In addition
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Abortion debate
The first argument is one that takes a position to support the idea that abortion‚ in certain cases‚ is morally permissible or is acceptable to do. The argument is given by Judith Jarvis Thompson. She concedes to the idea that the fetus is a person and is given the right to life for the sake of argument and to get into the moral permissibility‚ or the right and wrong of each decision depending on the circumstances for having an abortion. The right to life is simply your right to live and have a
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Abortion debate
If‚ as Marquis argues‚ it is wrong to kill a potential person because doing so deprives it of a future like ours‚ is it wrong to practice contraception and deprive a potential person of a future like ours? There are various views regarding abortion and whether it should be accepted. Applying the Doctrine of Sanctity of life is a conservative view against abortion. An observation made by Don Marquis believes that abortion is wrong because it deprives a being of a future like ours and it is morally
Premium Abortion Pregnancy
Marquis’ Anti-Abortion Argument * Marquis suggests that the parties to the abortion debate find themselves at a stand-off. Pro-lifers want to focus on the fact that fetuses are human beings (at least potentially) whereas pro-choicers want to focus on the fact that fetuses are not persons (even though they may be so potentially). * Marquis suggests that to make progress in the abortion debate‚ what we need is a new strategy. His preferred strategy is an argument he calls the “future life
Premium Abortion Fetus Abortion debate
us an another view to a problem of abortion. Mostly‚ Judith Jarvis Thompson protects pro-choice side‚ and she says that abortion is not immoral‚ and that it is logically correct action. However there are a lot of anti-abortion philosophers who are not agree with it. So Judith Thompson gives an arguments to proof her sides correctness. She says that mother has all rights to do anything with her body and things in her body. Judith Jarvis Thompson also believes that fetuses are not persons‚ and killing
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Abortion debate
has a right to life‚ then abortion is impermissible”‚ even though it can be challenged. I believe that Don Marquis has presented a strong argument in favor of the view that abortion is immoral. In fact‚ Marquis’ states in his premise one that “any being that can be deprived of a future like ours has a right to life”‚ the second premise is that “the human fetus has a future like ours”. Thus‚ Marquis’ conclusion is “the human fetus has
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Fetus
In “Why abortion is immoral‚” by Don Marquis‚ Marquis sets out an argument that abortion is “seriously immoral that it is in the same moral category as killing an innocent adult human being.” Marquis first wants us to understand why killing a person is wrong. He presents us with an argument that the loss of one’s life is one of the greatest losses one can suffer. Because this prevents a person from having a valuable human future‚ a future like ours. What makes killing any adult human being wrong
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Fetus
Don Marquis’ "Why Abortion is Immoral" In his essay "Why Abortion is Immoral‚" Don Marquis argues against the morality of abortion on the premise that the value of a fetus’ future is so great that it is immoral to take that potential future away from it. Essentially‚ he contends‚ abortion is tantamount to murder: killing an individual is prima facie wrong because the loss of the goods of one’s future is the worst loss a human can suffer. He calls this potential future a "future-like-ours‚"
Premium Abortion Abortion debate Pregnancy
The Dilemma of Marquis’ Future Like Ours Argument when applied to Euthanasia In his essay "Why abortion is immoral"‚ Don Marquis defends the anti-abortionist view. He bases his defense on the moral impermissibility of killing in general through what he calls the deprivation thesis (DT)‚ which is that killing is wrong if the subject of the killing has a future like ours because killing the subject deprives it of its future. Marquis’ argument‚ known as the future like ours (FLO) argument against
Premium Ethics Morality Euthanasia
Frequent text message users‚ social media advocates‚ and opinionated bloggers all write about various topics‚ but how does that compare to classic writing? Clive Thompson‚ author of Smarter Than You Think‚ continuously supports his mark that the Internet‚ regardless of its credibility‚ is progressively transforming today’s way of writing‚ allowing society to write more effectively and for longer lengths. Based on Thompson’s claims he makes in “Public Thinking”‚ it is apparent that appeals to logos
Premium Technology Critical thinking Writing