Contract Law Assignment Advise Grab From looking at the facts laid out by Grab regarding the purchase of a sandwich shop‚ it seems that the most likely action is that of misrepresentation. A misrepresentation is defined at common law as "a statement of fact made by one party to the other party‚ which is false. While not necessarily forming a term of the contract‚ is yet one of the main reasons which induces the one party to enter into the contract" and is supported by the Misrepresentation Act
Premium Misrepresentation Tort Common law
following article will address the basics of what makes a contract valid. In addition‚ this paper will include an example of a contract as well as which sections make it a valid contract. Then‚ a contract made between my husband and me‚ to demonstrate a simple contract. This paper will also go into the factors that make a verbal contract lawful. MGM230-0903B-04_P2-IP Many factors make up a valid contract‚ or a promise in which the law will enforce. First there needs to be an agreement between
Premium Contract
Introduction to Business Law- Assignment 1B Advise TLC Ltd. as to any possible action they may have for misrepresentation against answer Ltd. _____________________________________________________________________ Treitel in The Law of Contract (2003) defines a contract as: “An agreement giving rise to obligations which are enforced or recognised by law. The factor which distinguishes contractual from other legal obligations is that they are based on the agreement of the contracting
Premium Contract
In brief: Mistake vs Misrepresentation • A mistake is inadvertent and only an error on the part of the person committing it while misrepresentation is often wilful or intentional‚ done with the intention of gaining wrongfully. The main difference between Mistake and Misrepresentation is that in the case of Mistake one or both parties to a contract or what was intended to be a contract unintentionally or unknowingly made statements not intended to mislead the other. Therefore fraud cannot be
Premium Misrepresentation
the Law of Contract the phrase “mistake” & “Misrepresentation” is applied when one or both parties of a contract act under a false or mistaken understanding. Mistake can be defined by Pendleton ‚ Vickery (1998)‚ [1] as; ➢ A misunderstanding regarding a fact‚ causing one or more parties to hold disagreeing beliefs about the foundation of a contract. Mistakes can be made in the form of a contracts subject matter or as a mistake of identity. There are 3 different types of mistake in Contract Law
Premium Contract Contract law Law
Mutual Mistakes in Contract Law 4-3 Mutual Mistakes in Contract Law Southern New Hampshire University Abstract In contractual law‚ a mutual mistake is: “Where a mistake of both parties at the time of contract was made as to a basic assumption on which the contract was made has a material effect on the agreed exchange of performances‚ the contract is voidable by the adversely affected party unless he bears the risk of the mistake under the rule stated in 154.” (Rasmusen‚ 1993) 4-3
Premium Contract Contract law Common law
3. Contract Law “Is My Agreement an Enforceable Contract?” The Law of Contract involves answering 4 questions: (1) Is my agreement an enforceable contract? Are all of the elements of a contract present. (2) If so‚ what does it require me (and the other party) to do? - What “promises” have become terms of the contract. (3) Can I get out of it (without paying some form of penalty)? - Was the formation of the contract defective in some way (ie were there any ‘vitiating elements’ present)
Premium Contract
CHAPTER EIGHT MISREPRESENTATION A misrepresentation is an untrue statement‚ which induces the other party to enter into the contract. A misrepresentation may be fraudulent‚ negligent misstatement‚ or wholly innocent. The applicable remedy depends on the nature of the misrepresentation. In order for a representation to amount to an actionable misrepresentation it must be: a) false; b) one of fact as oppose to intention‚ opinion‚ or law; c) The statement must be addressed to the party who
Premium Misrepresentation
CONTRACT & AGENCY LAW END-OF-COURSE ASSESSMENT JULY 2012 PRESENTATION Submission Date : 08 Sept 2012 Question 1: Legal issues: As there are different parts to “Clause 8” in the employment contract which Julia as an employee has signed with Calypso Private Limited‚ we shall examine four separate legal issues. The first legal issue is whether Calypso is able to enforce part (a) of Clause 8 which states that Julia shall not be directly or indirectly
Premium Damages Breach of contract Contract law
OPTIONAL QUESTION: Advise: (A) Mr. Neft given that Mr Browne has failed to appoint him to Chief of Police. The first issue is whether the contract between John Browne and Mr. Neft was illegal by common law. At common law an illegal contract is determined based on public policy and results in the contract being unenforceable. In the case of Enderby Town FC Ltd v Football Association‚ Lord Denning referred to public policy as an ‘unruly horse’‚ due to its broad character and its subjectivity to
Premium Misrepresentation Contract