• If Two Heads Are Better Than One
    Chapter 1 Organizational Behavior 1. How liable should companies be for violent acts committed during work by their own employees? It depends. Companies should be liable to a certain extent for violent acts that are...
    Premium 756 Words 4 Pages
  • Business Strategy
    1. How liable should companies be for violent acts that are committed during work by their own employees? Answer: companies should be liable to a great extend in case of workplace violence. Or it can be said that company must take much of the blame. If any violent act occurs at the workplace...
    Premium 911 Words 4 Pages
  • Workplace Violence
    Chapter 1 – Case Incident 2 Workplace Violence 1. How liable should companies be for violent acts that are committed during work by their own employees? * I believe this depends on the policies set forth by the company ant the company’s ability to be consistent with said policies. If a...
    Premium 541 Words 3 Pages
  • Violence
    1. How liable should companies be for violent acts that are committed during work by their own employees? * I believe this depends on the policies set forth by the company ant the company’s ability to be consistent with said policies. If a company doesn’t have any set policies and doesn’t take...
    Premium 300 Words 2 Pages
  • Case Incident 1, Organizational Behavior
    1. How liable companies be for violent acts that are committed during work by their own employees? They need to be aware of at-risk employees who may commit violent acts and the managers of the company should encourage their employees to report any threatening or suspicious behavior. Also depends...
    Premium 445 Words 2 Pages
  • Workplace Violence
    1. How liable should companies be for violent acts that are committed during work by their own employees? Mostly, violent acts at workplace occur because of the employee's hatred towards his colleagues or the company. Either it is the other employees or the company being the reason of hatred, but...
    Premium 685 Words 3 Pages
  • Whistle Blower in an Organization
    that are committed during work by their own employees? Answer: Companies should be fully liable for the welfare of its employees. Protective measures must be taken to ensure safe working environments for its members. 2. Can companies completely prevent workplace violence? If not, what steps can they...
    Premium 1185 Words 5 Pages
  • Organization Behaviour
    DaimlerChrysler plant are even suggesting that metal detectors be installed to prevent future violence. Whatever measures are taken, it is clear that workplace violence is an issue that needs to be addressed for employees to feel safe at work Questions 1. How liable should companies be for violent...
    Premium 686 Words 3 Pages
  • Perception of Violence Against Women
    whether through the judicial systems or law enforcement or through the company, and the company's response. 2.) Different races and their perception of the threat of violence in the workplace. 3.) Relationship between the individual and the attacker of the violent acts committed against the...
    Premium 10212 Words 41 Pages
  • Case Today
    that workplace violence is an issue that needs to be addressed for employees to feel safe at work. Guide Questions: 1.How liable should companies be for violent acts com­mitted during work by their own employees? 2.Can companies completely prevent workplace violence? If not, what steps can they...
    Premium 777 Words 4 Pages
  • Negligent Hiring
    reasonably should have known of the employee’s tendency toward violence (or even incompetence), the employee in question committed a tortuous act against the third party, and the employer owes a duty of care to third parties within the zone of foreseeable risks created by the employment relationship...
    Premium 2948 Words 12 Pages
  • Common Law
    there was no ‘mutuality of obligations’ and hence no contract. 29 Vicarious Liability Employees relationship The Course of Employment The employer is only liable for the employee’s torts committed in the course of employment. Broadly, the test here is whether the employee was doing the work...
    Premium 6664 Words 27 Pages
  • Stress in Organizations
    nothing to prevent it. In addition to being fined by OSHA, employers can also be sued by victims of violence. The legal test for determining employer liability for violent acts committed by non-employees is as follows. The employer is liable if: • it knew or should have known that a criminal act...
    Premium 2871 Words 12 Pages
  • Aspects of Criminal Law
    in a situation that allows you to act to avoid more damage than the already existing, you should always act and help stop the damage than contributing to the damage. Failure to act during a chain of events may leave you getting charged and possibly found guilty. Causation If a criminal crime is...
    Premium 3515 Words 15 Pages
  • Under What Circumstances Can an Employer Be Held Vicariously Liable for the Torts of His Employees? and Why Should One Person Be Held Liable for the Torts Committed by Others?
    an employer can be held liable for the torts committed by his/her employees and sometimes for the torts of the contractors. But at this point someone might ask why someone else should be held liable for the wrongful act committed by a different person. Rest of this essay will focus on answering to...
    Premium 1419 Words 6 Pages
  • Human Resources Arbitration Brief
    failure to exercise the care that a reasonable prudent person would exercise in this situation.2 Under the rules of vicarious liability, employers are responsible for the torts committed by their employees in the course of their employment. This means that Preston is liable to report what Butler expressed...
    Premium 3457 Words 14 Pages
  • BLAW Ch 1-8 study guide
    ) shareholder; did (b) shareholder; did not (c) stakeholder; did (d) stakeholder; did not Answer: A. Milton Friedman believed that if shareholder and stakeholder interests conflict, the company should act in the best interest of the shareholders. 2. In the 1919 lawsuit Dodge v. Ford, the Dodge...
    Premium 8741 Words 35 Pages
  • Business Law
    to take responsible for a range of actions that are engaged by their employees in the course of their employment. It may include bullying and disturbance, violent or discriminatory acts or even defamation and breach of copyright. It's also possible to take act against an employer for the...
    Premium 7390 Words 30 Pages
  • Vicarious Liability
    law. Employers also have the power to discipline employees for poor working practice, they therefore have the ability to minimise the risk of tortuous acts. If they don’t discipline their employees and then they commit a tortuous act for a similar reason then employers should be found liable as they...
    Premium 1999 Words 8 Pages
  • College Background Checks
    harassment (Kaplin & Lee, 2009). The foresee ability doctrine is applicable when administrators know there is an offender on campus but they do nothing to warn other students of the potential for a violent act. FERPA vs. Clery Act In the debate over whether institutions should implement CBC’s the...
    Premium 6674 Words 27 Pages