Assuming Arguendo That This E Mail Does Constitute An Agreement What Consideration Supports This Agreement Essays and Term Papers

  • LAW/421 Week Three Case Scenario Big Time Toy Market

    Chou’s new strategy game, Strat. Assuming BTT and Chou have a contract, and BTT has breached the contract by not distributing the game, discuss what remedies might or might not apply. Explain your answers and refer to Section 7-6 in Ch. 7 for support. 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties...

    Premium | 543 Words | 2 Pages

  • Law 421 Week 4

    bought the rights to negotiate the distribution agreements for Chou’s board game. A bilateral contract is an agreement of two promises and two performances. The agreement stipulated that at the end of the 90-day period, there wasn’t a distribution agreement unless it was in writing. Considering that an...

    Premium | 636 Words | 1 Pages

  • Law. Big Time Toymaker

    1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? According to the scenario, both Big Time Toymaker and Chou did partake in an oral contract. During the meeting both parties reached an oral distribution agreement, and a confirmation of the terms of the agreement was sent by e-mail. 2...

    Premium | 328 Words | 2 Pages

  • Theses

    ;StartDate=09/23/2014&UserType=ST" LAW/421 - CONTEMPORARY BUSINESS LAWOctober 19, 2014 ROBERT LEWANDOWSKI BIG TIME TOYMAKERS (BTT) In this week’s reading we read about the company Big Time Toymaker (BTT); which develops, manufactures, and distributes board games and other toys to the United...

    Premium | 872 Words | 2 Pages

  • Big Time Toy Maker

    2012 Jacques Ward 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? BTT and Chou reached an agreement when BTT paid him the $25,000 in exchange for exclusive negotiation rights for a 90 day period. Although the negotiation agreement specified no distribution contract existed...

    Premium | 420 Words | 2 Pages

  • Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker - Law421

    distributing Strat and entered into an agreement with Chou, offering him $25,000 in exchange for exclusive negotiation rights for a 90-day period. This agreement stipulated that no distribution contract existed unless it was in writing. On day 87 of the agreement, the parties held a negotiation meeting...

    Premium | 2098 Words | 6 Pages

  • Case Scenario:Big Time Toys

    Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? I think the parties had a contract as soon as BTT sent over the email names Strat Deal. If it weren't in the exclusive negotiation agreement that stated the no distribution contract valid unless...

    Premium | 739 Words | 4 Pages

  • Theory to Practices

    Theory to Practice 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? The proposed contract existed immediately following the agreement to exclusive rights. The contract from that point was valid for 90 days following the agreement, which blocked Chou’s ability to negotiate with other...

    Premium | 940 Words | 3 Pages

  • Law421 Casescenario Bigtimetoymaker

    1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? The contract was established at the in-person meeting where the distribution agreement details were agreed upon. The fact that Chou was going to reiterate the details in writing is not required. The manager emailing the same agreed upon...

    Premium | 551 Words | 2 Pages

  • LAW 421 Week 4 Big Time Toymaker

    In this document of LAW 421 Week 4 Big Time Toymaker you will find the next information: Read the “Theory to Practice” section at the end of Ch. 6 of the text. Answer Questions 1 through 6 based on the scenario in the “Theory to Practice” section, and complete the following in...

    462 Words | 2 Pages

  • week 2

    1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? Subsequent to reading the scenario, I discovered that there was a contract in place when BTT sent an email to Chau talking about the original terms of agreement. BTT sent Chou an e-mail where the topic line read “Strat Deal.” This email...

    Premium | 634 Words | 2 Pages

  • Big Time Toymaker Scenario

    Chou negotiate the potential distribution of Strat, ending with BTT declining to distribute the game. The legal issues presented are as follows: At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? BTT and Chou must exhibit mutual assent to determine when a contract was reached. The contract is...

    Premium | 937 Words | 3 Pages

  • Essay

    2014 Aileen S. Azadian Question 1 At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? Answer: Big Time Toymaker and Chou had an oral contract. In a meeting that included Big Time Toymaker and Chou an agreement was reached. Additionally, an e-mail was sent by Big Time Toymaker to Chou that...

    Premium | 534 Words | 4 Pages

  • Uop Law 421 Week 4 Individual

    LAW/421 April 23, 2012 Professor Douglas Edmunds 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? The parties had a contract when they spoke of and agreed on the deal that was later followed up by a BTT manager via email. 2. What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of...

    Premium | 452 Words | 2 Pages

  • Big Time Toy-maker

    Big Time Toy-maker 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? The parties had an oral contract when all parties met. 2. What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of the parties’ objective intent to contract? One factor is that both parties agreed with an oral contract...

    Premium | 263 Words | 1 Pages

  • Big Time Toy

    Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? While both parties did have an oral agreement they did not have a contract in place. In the case scenario they also agreed to have Chou memorialize their agreement. In the original negotiating contract it...

    Premium | 405 Words | 2 Pages

  • LAW 421 WEEK 4

    1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? The only agreement that was made between the two was at the start.. The 90 day period that was paid off by BTT for Chou. After this there was no actual contract. They did discuss about having a contract and making it go through email but...

    Premium | 478 Words | 2 Pages

  • Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker

    distributes board games and other toys globally, entered into an agreement with Chou, an independent inventor of a new strategy game he name Strat, to distribute this new game. However, over more than a 90-day period, BTT reneged on the agreement and was in breach of contract stating BTT were no longer interested...

    Premium | 1243 Words | 4 Pages

  • Week 4 Toymaker

    include obligations of the parties and if they follow the agreement. The contract that Chou and BTT had was not a written contract it was an agreement used that deal with services to distribute the game; it was not a production or sales contract. This contract was not necessary for that particular reason...

    Premium | 890 Words | 3 Pages

  • Big Time Toymaker V. Chou

    1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? I believe that there were two contracts made in this scenario. The first one was the verbal contract that sated that the stipulations of price and the fact that there needed to be a written contract before distributing the product. The email...

    Premium | 943 Words | 3 Pages