• LAW/421 Week Three Case Scenario Big Time Toy Market
    Chou’s new strategy game, Strat. Assuming BTT and Chou have a contract, and BTT has breached the contract by not distributing the game, discuss what remedies might or might not apply. Explain your answers and refer to Section 7-6 in Ch. 7 for support. 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties...
    Premium 543 Words 2 Pages
  • Law. Big Time Toymaker
    1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? According to the scenario, both Big Time Toymaker and Chou did partake in an oral contract. During the meeting both parties reached an oral distribution agreement, and a confirmation of the terms of the agreement was sent by e-mail. 2...
    Premium 328 Words 2 Pages
  • Big Time Toy Maker
    2012 Jacques Ward 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? BTT and Chou reached an agreement when BTT paid him the $25,000 in exchange for exclusive negotiation rights for a 90 day period. Although the negotiation agreement specified no distribution contract existed...
    Premium 420 Words 2 Pages
  • Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker - Law421
    distributing Strat and entered into an agreement with Chou, offering him $25,000 in exchange for exclusive negotiation rights for a 90-day period. This agreement stipulated that no distribution contract existed unless it was in writing. On day 87 of the agreement, the parties held a negotiation meeting...
    Premium 2098 Words 6 Pages
  • week 2
    1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? Subsequent to reading the scenario, I discovered that there was a contract in place when BTT sent an email to Chau talking about the original terms of agreement. BTT sent Chou an e-mail where the topic line read “Strat Deal.” This email...
    Premium 634 Words 2 Pages
  • Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker
    distributes board games and other toys globally, entered into an agreement with Chou, an independent inventor of a new strategy game he name Strat, to distribute this new game. However, over more than a 90-day period, BTT reneged on the agreement and was in breach of contract stating BTT were no longer interested...
    Premium 1243 Words 4 Pages
  • Big Time Toy
    Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? While both parties did have an oral agreement they did not have a contract in place. In the case scenario they also agreed to have Chou memorialize their agreement. In the original negotiating contract it...
    Premium 405 Words 2 Pages
  • Law421 Casescenario Bigtimetoymaker
    1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? The contract was established at the in-person meeting where the distribution agreement details were agreed upon. The fact that Chou was going to reiterate the details in writing is not required. The manager emailing the same agreed upon...
    Premium 551 Words 2 Pages
  • Big Time Toymaker Scenario
    Chou negotiate the potential distribution of Strat, ending with BTT declining to distribute the game. The legal issues presented are as follows: At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? BTT and Chou must exhibit mutual assent to determine when a contract was reached. The contract is...
    Premium 937 Words 3 Pages
  • Theory to Practices
    Theory to Practice 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? The proposed contract existed immediately following the agreement to exclusive rights. The contract from that point was valid for 90 days following the agreement, which blocked Chou’s ability to negotiate with other...
    Premium 940 Words 3 Pages
  • Essay
    2014 Aileen S. Azadian Question 1 At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? Answer: Big Time Toymaker and Chou had an oral contract. In a meeting that included Big Time Toymaker and Chou an agreement was reached. Additionally, an e-mail was sent by Big Time Toymaker to Chou that...
    Premium 534 Words 4 Pages
  • Big Time Toy-maker
    Big Time Toy-maker 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? The parties had an oral contract when all parties met. 2. What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of the parties’ objective intent to contract? One factor is that both parties agreed with an oral contract...
    Premium 263 Words 1 Pages
  • Uop Law 421 Week 4 Individual
    LAW/421 April 23, 2012 Professor Douglas Edmunds 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? The parties had a contract when they spoke of and agreed on the deal that was later followed up by a BTT manager via email. 2. What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of...
    Premium 452 Words 2 Pages
  • LAW 421 WEEK 4
    1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? The only agreement that was made between the two was at the start.. The 90 day period that was paid off by BTT for Chou. After this there was no actual contract. They did discuss about having a contract and making it go through email but...
    Premium 478 Words 2 Pages
  • Case Scenario
    Scenario: Big Time Toymaker 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? After reading the case scenario, I do not believe either of the two parties involved ever established a binding distribution contract. It is true an oral distribution agreement was achieved just three days prior...
    Premium 1227 Words 4 Pages
  • Week 4 Toymaker
    include obligations of the parties and if they follow the agreement. The contract that Chou and BTT had was not a written contract it was an agreement used that deal with services to distribute the game; it was not a production or sales contract. This contract was not necessary for that particular reason...
    Premium 890 Words 3 Pages
  • Big Time Toymaker V. Chou
    1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? I believe that there were two contracts made in this scenario. The first one was the verbal contract that sated that the stipulations of price and the fact that there needed to be a written contract before distributing the product. The email...
    Premium 943 Words 3 Pages
  • LAW 421 Theory to Practice
    distribution contract. The first agreement was a 90-day negotiation agreement and the second was an oral distribution agreement in a meeting prior to the end of the 90-day negotiation. The oral agreement was followed by an e-mail sent to Chou in which the terms of the agreement were reiterated by the manager...
    Premium 772 Words 3 Pages
  • Bigtoymaker Law421
    1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? The two parties, BTT and Chou entered into a contract when an oral agreement was made. In addition to the oral agreement, an email was sent later from BTT to Chou summarizing and capturing their agreement around time frames, price and party...
    Premium 786 Words 3 Pages
  • Big Time Toymaker Case Scenario
    Big Time Toymaker Case Scenario LAW/421 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? I do not think the two parties involved ever had a contract. In the scenario, the parties reached an agreement only three days before the end of a 90-day deadline set in the original negotiation...
    Premium 722 Words 2 Pages