Stare decisis is one of the most important doctrines in common law. It is the doctrine under which courts adhere to precedent on questions of law in order to ensure certainty‚ consistency‚ and stability in the administration of justice.1 More specifically‚ it has been defined as "to stand by decided cases; to uphold precedents; to maintain former adjudications."2 In Latin‚ the term translates to "to stand by that which is decided." As practiced in the United States‚ the rule of stare decisis
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Law United States Constitution
Criminal Law (CJUS 2222) Assignment 1 Is Stare Decisis an Inexorable Command? Stare decisis is defined as the legal principle that requires that courts be bound by their own earlier decisions and by those of higher courts having jurisdiction over them regarding subsequent cases on similar issues of law and fact. Inexorable is defined as not to be persuaded‚ moved‚ or stopped. With that being said‚ the court stating that “Stare decisis is not an inexorable command‚ rather it is a principle of
Premium Law Jury Stare decisis
People v. Quiamanlon‚ G.R. No. 191198‚ Jan. 26‚ 2011 (1st Division)‚ J. Velasco Jr. Facts: That on or about the 15th day of June 2005‚ a buy-bust operation was conducted at KFC Welcome Rotonda. Accused-appellant unlawfully sold 0.12 gm. of white crystalline substance and she was found to be in possession and control of 0.27 gm. of the same substance. The accused-appellant was arrested and the buy-bust money was recovered from her by PO3 Magcalayo. PO3 Villamor recovered the other two (2) plastic
Premium Stare decisis Law Supreme Court of the United States
DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT AND STARE DECISIS What do you understand by precedent in the English legal system? It is a legal case establishing a principle or rule that a court or other judicial body may utilize when deciding subsequent cases with similar issues or facts. What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a legal system based upon the doctrine of precedent instead of having a legal system based upon codified law? Advantages 1. Provides certainty in law. 2. Judges have clear
Free Common law Precedent Stare decisis
principle of Stare decisis must be applied. This foundational principle in the U.S. legal system sets a base for favoring the adherence to precedent in order to establish a consistent and stable courtroom climate.
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Stare decisis Common law
“Stare Decisis” is an abbreviation of the phrase “stare decisis et non quieta movere” which translates as “to stand by decisions and not to disturb settled matters”. This principle can thus be aptly described to be that of applying the ratio decidendi of similar previous cases to that of future cases. It is important to first illustrate how the common law doctrine of stare decisis works. Vertical Stare decisis is where a decision of that of a higher court is binding on the lower courts. However
Premium Law Common law Contract
INTRODUCTION: Stare decisis is a legal principle by which judges are obliged to respect the precedent established by prior decisions. The words originate from the phrasing of the principle in the Latin maxim Stare decisis et non quieta movere: "whatever has been decided must stand". In a legal context‚ it means that courts should generally abide by precedent and not disturb settled matters. However‚ this doctrine has been overruled by courts in some cases. International trade laws have not always
Premium Stare decisis Common law Precedent
similar question of the law and factual situation. The judges are required to follow and apply the principle in past decisions to a current case which have similar situation. There are two principle which is Vertical Stare Decisis and Horizontal Stare Decisis. Generally‚ Horizontal Stare Decisis is the court have to binds itself to prior decisions. Horizontally is a court usually an appellate court is restrain by its own earlier decisions‚ the decisions of its predecessor and the decisions of courts of
Premium Law Common law Judge
Precedent and Stare decisis in Hong Kong: The Case of Transgenders Introduction The doctrines of “precedent” and “stare decisis” have been pillars of Western Law that have withstood the test of time. They have been especially important in upholding the “Rule of Law” based on the tenets of predictability‚ expectations and stability‚ which are all important in a society based on norms and codes. Yet these legal concepts of precedent and “stare decisis” have been condemned for stifling the progress
Premium Planned Parenthood v. Casey Law Common law
Are Judges the Makers or Discoverers of the Law?: Theories of Adjudication and Stare Decisis with Special Reference to Case Law in Pakistan I. Introduction THE debate about whether judges make or create the law is at the centre of any discussion about stare decisis. Modern authors1 have discussed the views of judges and jurists in the past. This work focuses on some of the notable judges and jurists of the twentieth century‚ such as Lord Denning‚ Lord Reid‚ Lord Devlin‚ Bodenheimer‚ Hart
Free Common law Law