Oliver Cromwell was a loved and historical leader but also one of the most hated leaders. He was a very strict, brave and tactical leader. But was it because of his tactics he became a brilliant battle leader. In this essay I will be explaining why he was a great leader or not. Using the three sources including a drawing.
Cromwell is the man that fought in many major battles and won them. He helped parliament over throw the King of England. He did this by creating the new model army with its strict, disciplined, brave men. He built this army with Fairfax and with Cromwell’s tactics destroyed the opposition. But Cromwell didn’t just use his army to defeat other armys he used it to scare them. After the civil war the Irish rebelled. Cromwell took his army to Drogheda to destroy them. Drogheda surrendere but Cromwell carried on and killed every person in the village. This was against the rules if war. But historians say he did this to scare of any other rebels from attacking.
This source was written by a historian who wrote the biography so it won’t be biased. It shows that as a military commander he was very good. In 1643 he fought several battles and won all of them. Crowell won these battles because he disciplined his army a lot. He took in religious people so they wouldn’t loot and plunder. Also he had great tactics, he used a wheel where he ran around the side and attacked them from behind. These tactics allowed him to win all his matches. On the battle field he would control his army superbly, he would not late them chase after the opposition for loot and plunder. Cromwell in training kicked out anyone out of place who was misbehaving. This shows that he was a good leader. Parliament also had better resources and money this helped get better equipment and armour.
Source 2 was written by Clarendon in 1688 and was in France with Charles I son. This source is biased as he wasn’t and Drogheda. Also he was friends with the King so he would have supported them. This source tells us that the Irish threw down their weapons as an offer of peace. But Cromwell told his men to put everyone to sword which meant to kill everyone. This source is not very truthful as it is biased.
Source 3 is a drawing by a dutch artist in 1649. It shows Cromwell wearing the Kings crown, Orb, Sword, Armour and Royal robes. He standing in front of Charles I’s execution. To the left of Cromwell there are devils lifting a dog. Thes represents the Pope. It also shows that Cromwell and the supports of him hated the pope. I find ironic how Cromwell fought so hard to get rid of the king and now he has become one.
In conclusion I think Cromwell was good leader but a bad person. The way he controlled his army was amazing and the way he wasn’t scared of anything shows he was a great leader. But he was a bad person, when he attacked the Irish rebels he killed everyone after they surrounded. Also how he became king after all he had done to get rid of the King this shows how he was a bad person. However he was a great leader.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
What was also a key to Pitt’s success was that the King bestowed a large amount of confidence and trust in Pitt. He let Pitt get on with the business of running the country without much interference. Even when Pitt brought up the topic of constitutional reform, something the King had been strongly opposed to, the King did not get involved. Their relationship was professional rather than friendly, but it worked well. The confidence…
- 2172 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays -
Oliver Cromwell was born in 25 April 1599. Cromwell Died on 3 September 1658. He rose from fairly humble beginnings to become the most victorious military and political leader of the Civil Wars, who was part of the joint republican, military and parliamentarian effort that caused the downfall of the Stuart monarchy as a result of the English Civil War, and was consequently invited by his associate leaders to assume a head of state role in 1653. As such, Cromwell ruled as "Lord Protector" for a five-year segment (1653–58) of the 11-year period of Republican Commonwealth and settlement rule of England, and technically of Ireland, Wales and Scotland. As one of the commanders of the New Model Army, he played an essential role in the defeat of the King 's army, the royalists in the English Civil War. After the execution of King Charles I in 1649, Cromwell conquered the short-lived Commonwealth of England, conquered Ireland and Scotland, ruling as Lord Protector from 1653 until his death in 1658. He was also 1st Lord Protector of the Commonwealth of England, Scotland and Ireland. Oliver Cromwell is remembered because he was just another right-wing militarist religious zealot. In its way, the structure of the Lord Protectorate was a precursor of Stalinist Russia, with its Politburo, assembly and leadership cult - though substituting Puritanism for state-supported atheism. It could be said that everything Cromwell attempted, in the way of government reform, failed. It often failed within a year of the attempt - as with the Parliament of Saints. The Instruments of Government failed within eighteen months. He alternately enfranchised and disenfranchised various groups. He never found a calm solution to government and finally ruled despotically through his clutch of political commissars, the Major Generals. Finally, like Caesar, he was presented the Crown. Like Caesar, he first rejected, and then accepted it, but Oliver became the Lord Protector. His Protectorate hardly…
- 1167 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Henry had great success when dealing with The Yorkshire Rebellion 1498. It occurred when conflict between the Earl of Northumberland and the people of Northumberland and York sparked. The people were reluctant to pay more taxes and the Earl of Northumberland was killed when explaining about the situation...this is when the rebellion began. Henry was able to stop the rebellion quickly and swiftly, the leader of the rebellion was hung along with him accomplices, showing how Henry was able to deal with challenges to his authority smoothly and efficiently. The Yorkshire Rebellion was a local affair that did little to threaten the security of the realm therefore Henry was fully successful in dealing with this challenge.…
- 730 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
McCullough strategically and chronologically delineates each battle of the Revolution beginning with the Battle of Bunker Hill. Throughout each of the battles, McCullough thoroughly explains the colonial struggles and accomplishments as he also displays the British as a nasty group of individuals who were hard-hearted with loyalty to the Crown. However, most of the Loyalists simply feared the British royalty as punishment for treason was overbearingly harsh. Although biased, McCullough carefully displays the American Revolution as brutal for both the British and the colonists. He writes of “the most crucial year” from a cardinal view, concentrating emphasis on American strategy rather than British strategy. He acknowledges the British’s major distress, yet he undermines the importance of the drudgery of the Loyalists, disregarding the punishments that they were forced to endure by the colonists. Some of these castigations include the practice of tarring and feathering and merciless murder.…
- 556 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Oliver Cromwell was a key figure in the failure of finding an acceptable settlement during the interregnum as both Cromwell and his supporters 'Cromwellians' were key causes in the creating division. After Cromwell's appointment of Commander-in-Chief in June 1650 and his appointment as Head of State in December 1653 many problems began to rise above the surface. The first of the…
- 891 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
* William Pitt – He took leadership of the British ministry in 1756. His aggressive new policies for the war were a major part in turning the favor of the war towards the British in the later half of the war. Important civilian leader. Known as the “Great Commoner”. He drew much of his strength from the common people.…
- 518 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
From the devastating fall of Cardinal Thomas Wolsey, to the rise of his successor, the relentless Thomas Cromwell. Cromwell, throughout the course of English history has continually been portrayed as the main villain during Henry VIII’s reign, aside from Henry himself of course. A man, who thought nothing of betraying friends or allies in his conquest to secure the most notorious career in history. Since Henry VIII sent his chief minister and close advisor to the scaffold five centuries ago on 28 July 1540, historians have debated on the characterisation of Cromwell. Was he a manipulative death merchant who, throughout his political career killed and victimised thousands of innocent people for obeying their religious beliefs. Or was Cromwell simply a man of modest decent, risen from the ashes of his poor upbringing, due to his impeccable intelligence and determination?…
- 254 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Source E is source from a revisionist Historian who will have looked into a variety of sources regarding Thomas Cromwell’s demise prior to coming to an overall conclusion. When looking at providence of the source it is an impartial source as the writer does not have a motive, although like hay source it will have been opinion based. Throughout Cromwell’s career, he had made several reforms which were supported by the protestant radicals within parliament and at court, yet the conservatives strongly opposed Cromwell and a majority of the powerful noble house in England were very conservative in their views. Through reforms such as the dissolution of monasteries and continuation of the break from Rome, and his blatant advances towards a more protestant church in England he gained himself some very powerful enemies such as Thomas Howard who was a leading conservative leader and even introduced his niece to court to seduce Henrys mind and gain support against Cromwell within the court. Source E goes onto to say that Cromwell had already lost Henrys favour due to the collapse of the marriage to Anne of Cleves, ‘… might have survived if his enemies had not made good use of the collapse of the Cleves marriage’, the annulment of the Cleves marriage had put Norfolk in a very strong position through as I mentioned earlier the introduction of his niece, and his support at both…
- 774 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Thomas Wolsey largely was the main source of all authority over English government in the period 1515 - 1529. The chief reasoning behind this, put simply, is the fact that Wolsey created most of the significant policies and reforms of this period, including the centralisation of power at Westminster. Additionally, he was able to get past yet comply with the demands of his (supposed) superiors, in relation to the Church (thus making him a major figure within the establishment). On top of this, the conviction and assuredness in what Wolsey actually wanted, and how this related to his decisions, also very much agree with the idea that he was main source of all authority over English government within this period of time.…
- 1083 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
King George III played a significant part in Pitt’s success as Prime Minister but I wouldn’t say it was all down to the King. There were many aspects that contributed to his success and many were due to his relationship with King George, however some were simply because of Pitt himself. Some historians believe that his success was all based on his close links with the monarchy and without it he would never of been able to achieve the things he did but it is apparent that without the King’s help, Pitt may have never obtained his position in power. However, it is also clear that to a great extent, Pitt’s success is due to his own gained popularity, his logical and successful ideas and sheer determination. Despite the King’s help in enabling Pitt’s position in power, we must also analyse the other factors that contribute to Pitt’s success, for instance, the weakened status of the Whig’s leader, Charles Fox and the improvements that Pitt made to the financial and economical state of the nation.…
- 1149 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
This source was created in the year 1666 but the source itself was taken place in 1663 in Maryland.…
- 433 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The English Civil War began in 1642 between King Charles I and Parliament. Wealthy nobles, known as Royalists, supported the king. Supporters of Parliament included Puritans, who were led by Oliver Cromwell. Cromwell eventually became commander-in-chief of Parliament’s army. A number of battles took place between the king’s troops and Cromwell’s army, some of which are shown on the map below. The first battle, which took place at Edgehill, did not gain ground for either side. After a series of victories, however, Cromwell and Parliament took control of London and, eventually, England. In 1649 Charles I was publicly beheaded, and Parliament alone ruled England.…
- 321 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Today, rulers of other countries still bear the title Caesar. This name has achieved an unprecedented amount of respect. Julius Caesar is one of Rome's most famous leaders, and he has come to deserve that fame. Julius has many of the discrete characteristics of a leader. He was egotistic (some may say an egomaniac), he had a controlling power, he was intelligent, and he was ambitious. Although his reign did not prove as beneficial to Rome as it did for him, he is still considered a great leader.…
- 1368 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Benedict Arnold was a Revolutionary Hero that had a big affect on winning the war. He had boosted many of the soldiers moral during the war with his successful raids. Moral could be considered a reason for the Americans winning the war because it kept them going through there up and downs. To begin my essay, I’ll start it with a brief summary on Arnold, so the reader will understand who he really was.…
- 1647 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
During his reign of Britain, King Arthur displayed many of the attributes that make a good leader. These qualities were shown through his heroic contributions. He demonstrated a profound ability to keep peace with others. As king, he treated the people of his country with great respect, ensuring that everything he did would keep them safe. King Arthur was the greatest leader of his era.…
- 1740 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays