Preview

“Compare sources A and E as evidence for Churchill’s attitude to Communist Russia in the 1920s”.

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
503 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
“Compare sources A and E as evidence for Churchill’s attitude to Communist Russia in the 1920s”.
“Compare sources A and E as evidence for Churchill’s attitude to Communist Russia in the 1920s”.
Both Sources A and E are useful in understanding Churchill’s attitude to Communist Russia in the 1920s. Both sources agree that Churchill was against communism and the Bolsheviks reign over Russia after their 1917 overthrow of the government. This is evident in source A when Philip Guedalla writes that Churchill lays awake at night worrying about “sinister little communist figures”. This gives the idea that Churchill is indeed wary of the potential influence the Russian Bolsheviks could have, and was urgently trying to figure out how to combat them. In Source E, Churchill is blatant about the severity of the Bolsheviks regime when he says in his 1929 book, The Aftermath: “The revolution in Russia has produced a poisoned Russia”. The way that Churchill talks about how the Bolsheviks have “poisoned” Russia definitely indicates his persuasion towards communism as a whole, and firmly established his personal capitalist ideals.
In addition, the opening to Source A “Mr Churchill is seeing Red” could give the reader 2 ideas of him. Firstly, that Churchill is seeing red in a way of anger- that he doesn’t register what he’s doing and just acts out of instinct. On the other hand, red is closely related to Russian culture and has long been synonymous with communism
Source A goes onto say about how Churchill actually lays awake worrying about Russian communists with “inexhaustible supplies of dangerous pamphlets.” This gives the idea that Churchill was apprehensive about the idea of the Bolsheviks trying to expand their borders to beyond Russia and thus contaminate countries with communism. Source E is similar in that it mentions the possible spread of the “Bolsheviks infection” although that he was reliant on the neighbouring countries show immunity against Lenin’s regime and that would thus protect further countries, including the west.
Source A tells us that Churchill

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    (a) To what extent was the New Economic Policy (NEP) essential to the Bolshevik consolidation of power?…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Lewis Gaddis Summary

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this book writer, John Lewis Gaddis has talked about how Russia and eastern Europe are changing the way history specialists take a gander at the icy war. The primary contention that was made by the writer in this book was " How Soviet's perspective of one-sided security crashed into US's conviction that security is multilateral to create two ranges of prominence: one of compulsion and one of assent." The Partners Atlantic Contract, August 1941,Roosevelt, and Churchill announced 3 Wilsonian after war goals to guarantee global security through a multilateral approach: self-assurance, open market, and aggregate security. Stalin had firmly connected state security with his very own security and trusted security must be accomplished by denying every other person of it and picking up an area while the US thought of security as an aggregate decent inescapable clash.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    APUSH Notes: Chapter 31

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    -As communism swept through Russia, there was a fear that labor unions were influenced by the Bolsheviks…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2.The British people hoped that a strong Germany would hinder the growth of communist Russia…

    • 53 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The “Iron Curtain” speech by Winston Churchill and the election speech of Joseph Stalin contain the similarity that they both are telling the audience what should and has happened. In Winston Churchill’s speech he outlines what has happened throughout World War II and the Cold War and how he thinks it should be handled and dealt with. In Joseph Stalin’s speech he relays a similar time line while also including the Soviet Unions timeline and election history.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dziewanowski, M. K. (2003). Russia in the twentieth century (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    attempt to describe the provocative state that communism entailed, more specifically the provocative state Russia had become after the Civil War of 1818 and furthermore as Joseph Stalin began his term as head of the newly formed, USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics). Unequivocally, one of the strongest examples of this quote is the mass presence of homeless children that plagued communist Russia throughout its history. Known as the Bezprizorni, or wild children, these young adults and small children alike, became homeless as they lost their only relatives to the government directed Great Purge and the famines and wars that beset the people of this "Great Union". "The Wild Children", a book written by Felice Holman, depicts the life of a boy, Alex, whom becomes one of these bezprozorni after his family is taken away by the secret police. This great piece of literature not only captures the great struggle that these children had to face, but the plight all Russians had to succumb to in Communist Russia. How the communist leaders demanded utmost obedience and control over all factors of life and the lives of their comrades. How one was to be merely a comrade and nothing different, disallowing individualism, ownership and any aspirations or hope. How one was coerced not to think for themselves and rather blindly obey the position and perspectives of the leadership of Russia. How one was not to accept but rather, appreciate everything, they were to receive, without thought or hopes to something better. It ultimately, expresses the human desires and needs that are unaccounted for in a communistic society and proves it's inevitable disambiguation; a theoretically possible, yet realistically implausible government form that aims at the equalization of…

    • 1938 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joseph Mccarthyism Dbq

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Joseph McCarthy was a junior senator from Wisconsin who gave a speech in West Virginia in February 1950 in which he made the threat of communism clear to the people, “Today, only six years later, there are 800 million people under the absolute domination of Soviet Russia - an increase of over 400 percent. On our side the figure has shrunk to around 500 million. In other words, in less than six years the odds have changed from 9 to 1 in our favor to 8 to 5 against us” (Document G). The Soviet Union, whose form of government is communism, are extraordinarily dangerous. With the rate they are spreading world domination would not be far. With the 800 million the Soviet Russia has under their hand they can take on big powers such as the US. The…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aglaya's Response To Stalin

    • 2546 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Her opinion was not unusual at the time. Stalin was the leader of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union from 1922 until his death in 1953. Stalin was, essentially, the whole of the government. As Aglaya states, “Stalin was the Party, and the Party was Stalin (Voinovich, 23).” And the Party, at this time, had broad and general appeal. The Soviet citizen “...expected the state to provide a wide range of social benefits and services, as well as job security, and they approved the regime's stated welfare objectives (Bushnell, 362).” More importantly, the Party fulfilled these expectations. It redistributed resources. It intervened, should a business go bankrupt. The party nationalized industries and created jobs. Basic needs were provided for. Stalin gave workers a feeling of empowerment; there was no boss; there was just the state and the worker. With no sector of the population based entirely on money, social mobility was “exceptionally high (Vovchenko, 2/21).” As Aglaya undoubtedly appreciated, women were empowered. Daycare was made free. Through the collectivization of agriculture, food production increased during the 1940s and 1950s. The party was responsible for, in short, all aspects of the economic and social development of the nation (Ibid). The state was the only agent capable of providing the…

    • 2546 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Khrushchev’s vilification of Stalin in his address to the Twentieth Party Congress was meticulous in detailing precise failures of his predecessor’s rule. Above all, Khrushchev strongly elaborated on Stalin’s extremities, especially the cult of personality that he had built up over the years. The speech also in turn attacked ‘Stalinist repressions, arrests, terror and murders…[and] for bungling foreign affairs and mishandling the war’. Despite this, Khrushchev was cautious in limiting his other criticisms of Stalin, and it was this focus on him as an individual rather than of the overall Soviet system that defined the boundaries of acceptable criticism. As such, the speech sought to condemn Stalin without endangering the party’s validity or the system that had indeed allowed Khrushchev to rise to power.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Russian 1940's

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Soviet Union in the twentieth century was a tumultuous time for Russians who wished to speak their minds and for those who wished to stretch communism to the corners of the globe. With a government consumed by annihilating its opponents and censorship, Soviet writers such as Nikolai Bukharin and Grigori Deborin were compelled to depict the glory of communism or face the harshest of consequences. In “Down With Factionalism!,” Bukharin justifies his slander of Leon Trotsky in the battle to succeed Vladimir Lenin for the leadership of Russia. In Deborin’s “The Second World War,” he explains how the Soviet Union’s allies, England and the United States, let them down and how the USSR, alone, should be credited with saving Europe from Nazi Germany. Bukharin and Deborin rationalize soviet tactics through denouncing a political opponent and condemning capitalistic allies.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bolsheviks Primary Source

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Source A is supposed to be a valuable one because it’s adapted from Lenin’s April Theses for Peace, thus offering a perspective on the Revolution from the Bolshevik Party leader himself. However, the fact that it’s ‘adapted’ lowers its credibility, as the document might have suffered misleading changes, meant to portray Lenin and the Bolsheviks in a certain way. Moreover, the extract is published by the official communist newspaper which indicates a clear bias in favour of the Bolshevik Revolutionaries, making it a secondary source.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bob Jones

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Your favor of the 20th instant has been duly received and contents noted. I have also read the platitudinous and unconvincing enclosure, which sets up [a] straw man to be knocked down, but carefully avoids the [more] serious facts. Even in this enclosure it is interesting to note that the one "statesman-like" man in and out of office name is Senator Borch, author of the utterly mendacious speech in the interests of communism at the Chicago meeting gotten up two years ago by the Communist American Civil Liberties Union. This speech gave great comfort to the Communists and other enemies of the country, and its mendacity was freely quoted by them in support of their aims. Senator Barah had every opportunity to correct this mendacity, but did not do so. I would have had no doubt that the WILPF would find an ardent sympathizer in him. Both play into the hands of the Russian Communists. I note, too, that you refer to the red "New Republic," which I would also expect to support the WILPF.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gellately, R. (2013). Stalin 's curse: battling for communism in war and Cold War. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli had a grand vision of a man who would rule with cleverness and a steady hand when he wrote The Prince. Russia delivered a leader capable of taking power and controlling it in such a form as Machiavelli prescribed it. Vladimir Ilich Lenin was this man, he became the first leader of one of the most Machiavellian governments ever in existence, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays