Preview

‘Existence Cannot Be Seen to Be a Predicate of God’. Evaluate This in Relation to the Ontological Argument.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
613 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
‘Existence Cannot Be Seen to Be a Predicate of God’. Evaluate This in Relation to the Ontological Argument.
Defining existence as a predicate, or a property of God’s nature is essential within the ontological argument and many scholars have attacked the argument on this basis. My opinion is that existence cannot be seen to be a predicate of God or a predicate of anything else either.
Even if we assume that existence can be seen to be a predicate that something can have, I believe that the ontological argument fails in proving that existence is a predicate of God. Like Hume has argued, the whole basis of the ontological argument, especially in Descartes’ more rational format, in attempting to prove the existence of God using an a priori argument is faulty. I take the view that the existence of things can only be proved empirically, it isn’t possible to take the idea of God in one’s mind, apply pure logic to the idea and then come to a conclusion based entirely in the external, observable universe. God exists in the mind, but you can say no more than that without evidence.
Moreover, existence cannot be seen to be a predicate of God because, more generally, existence is not a predicate. I argue this because, as Hume and Kant have written, having an idea of something and then having it exist changes nothing about the nature of the thing. In fact “whatever we conceive, we conceive to be existent” (Hume, Treatise on Human Nature). Therefore, unlike describing a bird as blue, describing it as existing changes nothing about our perception of or in fact the bird itself at all.
Some, however, may argue that existence can be seen to be a predicate because having an object exist does change the way we conceive it. For example, some may, after reading Plato, insist that our perception of Socrates is changed if we learn that Socrates existed. Similarly, to conceive of God existing and not just a mere figment of many believers’ imagination adds something to the concept of God. However, I would argue that it doesn’t, and this is simply a misuse of language. Although I accept that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    According to William L. Rowe the Ontological argument can be thought of as “a family of arguments, each member of which begins with a concept of God, and by appealing only to a priori principles, endeavors to establish that God actually exists”(pg11, Feinberg, Shafer-Landau). The weakest version of the ontological argument is St Anselm version.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. It is a conceptual truth that God is a being than which none greater can be imagined God exists as an idea in the mind.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Classical Theistic Conception of God states that there is a unique intelligent being that created the universe and that being is wholly perfect, omnipotent, omniscient, and omni-benevolent. In connection with the question of whether belief in a being that satisfies this definition is ever grounded in evidence and argument there are three arguments to consider. These three arguments are the ontological argument, the cosmological argument, and the teleological argument. Each provides separate ideas in proving the existence of a being that satisfies the Classical Theistic Conception of God.…

    • 751 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anselm used the Ontological Argument to prove that God’s existence is necessary. The origins of this argument are found in Anselm’s writings, he began with a quotation from a Psalm “The fool says in his heart, ‘there is no God’…” and then reflected on the truthfulness of this. Anselm defined God as ‘that than which nothing greater can be conceived’ assuming you accept this a priori definition Anselm went on to state that anyone who denies God’s existence is a fool. He observed that it is greater to exist in reality than in the mind alone (you would prefer to have a real £20 note than an imaginary one). Someone who doubts God’s existence must have a concept of God in order for them to be able to reject it therefore if the concept of God is the greatest conceivable being then he must exist. He argued that existence was part of perfection, so if God is the greatest being (with all perfections) then it is necessary that he exists otherwise he cannot be the greatest conceivable being and that is not – to Anselm – the definition of God, the very fact that we can conceive of him as the greatest being proves, for Anselm, that he exists. For Anselm someone who denies God’s existence is essentially saying “God, who exists, does not exist”.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “God is usually conceived of as an unlimited being. He is conceived of as a being who could not be limited, that is, as an absolutely unlimited being.… If God is conceived to be an absolutely unlimited being He must be conceived to be unlimited in regard to His existence as well as His operation. In this conception it will not make sense to say that He depends on anything for coming into or continuing in existence. Nor, as Spinoza observed, will it make sense to say that something could prevent Him from existing. Lack of moisture can prevent trees…

    • 2339 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many different forms of arguments for the existence of God. It starts with the philosophers theories which goes way back in time and they believe that there is a God by what people has drawn through history and some personal experiences. The primary focus is the philosophical arguments which are the ontological argument, the first cause argument, the argument from design and the moral argument. When we as people look at each of these arguments it will give us more knowledge in the way that we think about them rationally that there is a god. The first two supporters that used the ontological argument were St. Anselm an eleventh century philosopher theologian and archbishop of Canterbury and French philosopher Rene…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Outline the Ontological argument for the existence of God and consider the view that, while it may strengthen a believer’s faith, it has no value for the non ....…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This argument is valid and is modus tollens. Ontological arguments are often accused of defining something into existence, one can show the nature of God, but cannot, in doing so, prove His existence. I do not feel that this argument is sound. I feel that it leaps from the notion of something existing in the understanding to the notion that it exists in reality without developing a clear concept or understanding of how that happens.…

    • 2513 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, we must look at the idea of conceiving. The American Heritage dictionary cites to conceive as “to apprehend mentally; understand”.3 We must also look at to what extent we can conceive. In my mind I can conceive the idea of a unicorn, the body of a horse, the beard of a billy-goat, the tail of a lion and a single spiral horn positioned in the centre of their head. Now each of these properties can very well exist in space in time but together, they have not been proven to exist yet. In the ontological argument, proposed by Descartes, God is described with the traits of perfection, omniscient and omnipotent.4 Now all these traits may exist separately but together, they have not been proven to exist yet. In addition to this I would like to propose the idea’s of Immanuel Kant. Kant describes two different scenes. The first is a man with $100 in space and time. The second is a man that imagines that he has $100. Now just because you have conceived the idea of $100 does not mean that it is exists in space and time. The man with the actual $100 is obviously richer than the…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The ontological argument describes God as “a being than which nothing greater can be conceived”, Anselm argued that the greatest possible being must exist otherwise he would not be the greatest possible being, although he must be the greatest possible being in every way including mind and reality. Anselm said atheists can define God even if they don’t believe in him. René Descartes said “I think therefore I am”, this means that if you can think about it you do exist, therefore if we think about God; he must exist. God must have all perfections in order to be the greatest being; existence was perfection is…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes also states that this argument isn’t strong enough to prove that God exists. Because he has been constantly revising his believes he says that at this point he can easily tell the difference between essence and existence. After he points that out he explains that he believes that God could be separated from the existence but not from his essence. Then he contradicts himself saying that not existing would be prove of him not being perfect thus he had to exist. After that Descartes starts lacking of confidence that God exists. He thinks that he is giving some attributions, being perfect; to a creature that he doesn’t even know if exists. He thinks that he is just matching two things that he knows to make something new, something that…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The ontological argument is a philosophical argument for existence of God. It argues that God is the greatest of all, and no being could possibly be greater. And it proves itself by the theory that God exists as an idea in our minds. Therefore God is also an idea that exists in reality. If God only was an idea of the mind and not reality we should be able to think of something greater that exists in both. Since we can not think of anything greater that exists in our mind and reality, God exists. The greatest island fails as an objection to the ontological argument because there could always be a better island. There is no intrinsic maximum for an island. The thought of God is a perfection of all sorts, like morals and power. These do have an…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The existence of God cannot be approved nor can it be disapprove. In the Bible it says that we must accept by faith that God exist .It is written in (Hebrews 11:6), God existence can be proven if you have a faith in him. There are also logical arguments, God is almighty and no one could be mightier than him. So his existence is greater to exist than not to exist or else it goes against the definition of God. Another argument also states the universe displays such an amazing design aka the world and there must be a divine designer. Lastly God’s existence is called the cosmological argument. Everything must come from a creation of some sort. The universe and everything has an effect and that uncaused cause is God.…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are many arguments about the existence of God since the beginning of time. According to some scientists God is an alleged entity that has no place in any scientific equations, plays no role in any scientific explanations, cannot be used to predict any events, does not describe anything or force that has yet been detected, and there are no models of the universe in which its presence is either required, productive, or useful. The religion of Buddhism and some modern sociologists and psychologists, believes that religious ideas and especially the god idea have their origin in fear, others may argue that God does not exist, because God who is all “good” cannot co-exist with evil. These critics deny the existence of an…

    • 1815 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aquinas – wrote in the summa theological “but the name of God means that He is infinite goodness, if therefore God existed there would be no evil discoverable but there is evil in the world. Therefore God does not exist.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics