Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

‘As science advances, the importance of religion declines.’ To what extent is this an accurate claim?

Good Essays
675 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
‘As science advances, the importance of religion declines.’ To what extent is this an accurate claim?
'AS SCIENCE ADVANCES, THE IMPORTANCE OF RELIGION DECLINES. ' TO WHAT EXTENT IS THIS AN ACCURATE

CLAIM?

Students of history would be aware that during the time known as the dark ages, religion ruled supreme in Europe. In fact it was tyrannical and put to death - after frightful torture - anyone who questioned the teachings of religion. The most number of casualties of the period were from the scientists. Even famed scientists like Galileo were victims of the dreaded Inquisition. It was an uphill task for scientists to continue with their researches. Scientists - in fact intellectuals of any subject - lived in fear of religion. Realising that knowledge was power, the kings and lords of the times supported religion in its suppression of science. Hence scientists had to hide their knowledge and experiments.

Then came the decline of religion, owing to several reasons. Men became more adventurous and daring and slowly began to release them selves from the grip of the vice of religion. Then began the march in the opposite direction. People, now leaned in the direction that religion was all 'nonsense '. Hence we see that the church was questioned when Dar win published his 'Origin of Species '. As it came to be more or less rea soned that man did not come to be born as described in the bible, peo ple began to question the validity of the bible itself. Though Christianity and the bible are used as examples here, the same has happened to other religions as well. As people became more inclined towards science, they went away from religion.

Upon being installed to a respectable status, science progressed in leaps and bounds and within just a couple of centuries established itself as being the last word on what are truths and what not. What has happened since then is that - as could be expected - science has dethroned religion. However, it is regrettable that in many cases, the baby has been thrown out with the bath water. In their effort to be scientific, many people have discarded religion. What is happening now in the world is that practical ly all religions stand in opposition to science and, naturally, science stands in opposition to religion.

Religion has always been in charge of social morals and it is still common to see that many people live exactly as religion prescribes they should. But this is a tendency that is fast losing ground. Followers of religion are getting less and less. As education throughout the world is brought to more and more people, especially education with regard to science, people begin to question age old beliefs. The proof of their senses becomes more important than adages and words of wisdom stated centu ries earlier, by ancestral wise men. Also people begin to realise that reli gion is mostly cther worldly. Since the other world is theory and the world of science here for us to touch and see and live, reality often wins against idealism.

The statement that religion declines in importance in the face of the_ popularity of science is therefore true. However, there is evidence to show that religion is fighting back too. Many religions are now getting more rational. There are breakaway factions from the orthodox ways that used to insist on blind adherence. In many aspects we see that religions are becoming more scientific. Many are now reinterpreting the scriptures to make them compatible with science and still others are researching into religion using scientific methods. Some are even claiming that religion is a science. Hence we see that all is not lost with religion. It may well be discovered that religion is scientific. Laws which were up to now unknown may well be waiting to be discovered and religion may still come into its own.

REFERENCES:

Dawkins, R. (2006). The God delusion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Dennett, D. (2006). Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. New York: Viking Penguin.

Kass, L. (1985). Toward a more natural science: Biology and human affairs. New York: The Free.

Kass, L. (2007). Science, religion, and the human future. Commentary,123(4), 36-48.

References: Dawkins, R. (2006). The God delusion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Dennett, D. (2006). Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. New York: Viking Penguin. Kass, L. (1985). Toward a more natural science: Biology and human affairs. New York: The Free. Kass, L. (2007). Science, religion, and the human future. Commentary,123(4), 36-48.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Imagine life as we know it without science. This may be hard to do, considering that scientific technology is now a perpetual symbol of modern-day life. Everything we see, everything we touch, and everything we ingest—all conceived of scientific research. But how did it come to be this way? Was it not only centuries ago that science began to surpass the authority of the church? Between the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries, natural philosophers, now known as scientists, founded a new world view on science, which was previously based on the Bible and classic philosophers like Aristotle and Ptolemy. Both people connected their natural studies directly to God and the Bible, creating ideas like a geocentric earth. With time and new ideas, scientists managed to develope methods for creating and discovering things in nature, and with enough resources and patronage, were able to answer asked and unasked questions. Science, however, was not supported by everyone, and had to face many challenges to achieve the power it maintains in today’s world. Due to the strong authority that politics, religion, and common social order controlled in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, science was subjectively held in the hands of those who could utilize it or reject it.…

    • 1531 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science and Religion

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It will be important to assess the view that science has replaced religion as the main ideological influences in society today.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As scientists, or natural philosophers, made new discoveries and theories they often dedicated them to the church, whether it was literal dedication or whether the finding supported the church. Even though they meant to support the church, many of those who did not understand the findings rejected them, but the fact that the common man could not always understand what an astronomer had investigated does not mean that it should be rejected. For the beauty and usefulness of the discoveries support what the common man knows and understands which is that God is God. (Doc. 2) The pressure that came from being rejected pushed scientists to search for acceptance in many cases for fear of being outcast, and there was no greater place to search for acceptance than from the church. Nicolaus Copernicus, Polish priest and astronomer, dedicated his works to Pope Paul III stating how he was not one to shrink from another’s criticism and that his findings contribute to the well being of the Church. (Doc. 1) Copernicus was a man of the church as well, making his words to the Pope weighted, however. Natural philosophers used the church as evidence in their findings as well. Once atoms and the structure of the world were discovered, it was too mind-blowing to not believe that all this perfect complexity was not brought together by an all-powerful being. But seeing that most men during this time were in some way affiliated with the church, it was very common for men to make these sorts of assumptions. (Doc. 8) Religion thus gave scientists a reason for discovery and evidence supporting discoveries.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout history the scientific and religious communities have fought to obtain dominance over the beliefs of the people.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Science contributes moral as well as material blessings to the world. Its great moral contribution is objective, or the scientific point of view. The means doubting everything except facts; it means hewing to the facts, lets the chips fall where they may.” (163)…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plantinga, Alvin. Where the conflict really lies: science, religion, and naturalism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.…

    • 3866 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kurt Baier

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Modern Scientific Picture: Scientists and educated men feel the Christian attitude towards the world and human existence is inappropriate. While science has both robbed us of any purpose that we had before, it has also furnished us with enormously greater power to achieve these purposes.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Overemphasis on one philosophy has often led to a strong reaction by another philosophy. In our time of emphasizing science, we see a resurgence of religious fundamentalism in many parts of the world. This may be explained by a closing-of-the-ranks of those who feel seriously threatened in their security by the loss of the foundation of their faith and culture or gain merit by fighting for their faith – and also explained by the defense of hierarchies hanging on to their power.…

    • 2841 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science verses Religion has been an ongoing debate all over the world for centuries. Depending on who one talks to about these topic will depend on the passion and beliefs one has. As we saw in the movie Angels and Demons all the major characters such as Robert Langdon, Camerlengo McKenna and the former pope had their own strong feelings and beliefs. Certain questions have been raised about these two topics that I will be elaborating on later in this essay such as, Is there room in the world for both, Can one render the other obsolete, and would I rather live in a world without science or religion? I find all these questions very interesting and interaging, just like the movie Angels and Demons.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eventhough, science provided to our society enormous knowledge about the universe and the possibilities how to use matter and energy, which lead to the mass production of superhuman technology, science has not been always appreciated by the humans. Religious communities abused the scientific individuals and theories throughout the European modern history. Ideas, that are known to be fact nowadays, like heliocentrism, dissemination of the diseases by germs, or the shape of the Earth were rejected by the society, because of the massive power of the Church. Hence, the religious impact on the educational system in the 20th century, after the breakthroughs of Newton or Einstein, portrays the humanity as a stubborn, ignorant, and intolerant civilization. The fact, that there is a countless number of churches in the United States, but the budget for NASA decreases almost every year, proves that our society is not ready to get on a higher and more intelligent level. Therefore, I suggest that our society finally acknowledges the most famous quote from Nietzsche: “God is…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historic Model of Science

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The ‘heroic model’ of science was a phenomenon of the western world, during the Enlightenment. This wonder aided in transforming scientists, philosophers and others among them into cultural heroes. Science became a part of home life, when in previous times science was seen as a threat to religion and thus proclaimed as wrong. Once science became a part of life and began to prove and bluntly say things that the bible and religion could not come near to explaining, it became the basis for fact. The ‘heroic model’ could easily be blamed for the breakdown of the religious-infested societies that plagued the world.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religion and science both serve different purposes in the world, however their purpose produce the same goal depending on what one believes in. Christians believe that the world was created by God in seven days while scientists believe in the Big Bang Theory. Jane Goodall, known for her study of chimpanzees, expresses her belief that oneness with nature is best achieved through first hand observation in her essay, “In the Forest of Gombe.” On the other hand, Barbara Kingsolver views science, especially Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection, as the only answer to understanding the environment. In her essay, “A Fist in the Eye of God,” Kingsolver examines the concept of genetic engineering and presents the reader with the dangers of this scientific concept. Goodall and Kingsolver both discuss nature, evolution, science and religion. Although they have different views about how nature came about, they both believe that the natural world should be left alone. For Goodall a connection exists between science and religion yet Kingsolver feels that the theory of evolution should be taught to children instead of religion.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Chapter 4” discussed the relationship between the Church and new scientific ideas. From our previous discussions and readings, I knew that the Church was not very open to new ideas. However, I did not fully understand the extent of how harshly the Church treated people who they saw as “going…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For hundreds of years, science and religion have been at odds. From the execution of the Greek philosopher Socrates to the Renaissance in Europe to modern times, the two opposing forces have always had an abrasive relationship. The beginning of the…

    • 2528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article claims that by nature, it is impossible for science and religion to conflict primarily because their individual concerns are entirely distinct. This, however, brings about the debate of the role of both religion and science in our society. Religion I mainly faith based and is illogical, that does not require evidence. Science, on the other hand, is logical and is purely based on actual evidence. Many have criticized this idea on nonoverlapping magisteria claiming it holds no basis. For instance, given that both science and religion has different stories on how the earth came to exist, are they both teaching different domains? The debate lies on whether or not science and religion can co-exist without overlapping or…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays