Preview

J.S.Mill

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
13220 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
J.S.Mill
-------------------------------------------------
John Stuart Mill (1806-1873)
John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) profoundly influenced the shape of nineteenth century British thought and political discourse. His substantial corpus of works includes texts in logic, epistemology, economics, social and political philosophy, ethics, metaphysics, religion, and current affairs. Among his most well-known and significant are A System of Logic, Principles of Political Economy,On Liberty, Utilitarianism, The Subjection of Women, Three Essays on Religion, and his Autobiography.Mill’s education at the hands of his imposing father, James Mill, fostered both intellectual development (Greek at the age of three, Latin at eight) and a propensity towards reform. James Mill and Jeremy Bentham led the “Philosophic Radicals,” who advocated for rationalization of the law and legal institutions, universal male suffrage, the use of economic theory in political decision-making, and a politics oriented by human happiness rather than natural rights or conservatism. In his twenties, the younger Mill felt the influence of historicism, French social thought, and Romanticism, in the form of thinkers like Coleridge, the St. Simonians, Thomas Carlyle, Goethe, and Wordsworth. This led him to begin searching for a new philosophic radicalism that would be more sensitive to the limits on reform imposed by culture and history and would emphasize the cultivation of our humanity, including the cultivation of dispositions of feeling and imagination (something he thought had been lacking in his own education).
None of Mill’s major writings remain independent of his moral, political, and social agenda. Even the most abstract works, such as the System of Logic and his Examination of Sir William Hamilton’s Philosophy, serve polemical purposes in the fight against the German, or a priori, school otherwise called “intuitionism.” On Mill’s view, intuitionism needed to be defeated in the realms of logic,



References: * Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996. * Bentham, Jeremy. The Works of Jeremy Bentham. Edited by John Bowring. 10 vols. New York: Russell and Russell, 1962. * Carlyle, Thomas. A Carlyle Reader. Edited by G.B. Tennyson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. * Carlyle, Thomas. Critical and Miscellaneous Essays. Philadelphia: Casey and Hart, 1845. * Carlyle, Thomas. Past and Present. London: Ward, Lock, and Bowden, Ltd., 1897. * Coleridge, S.T.C. On the Constitution of the Church and State According to the Idea of Each (3rd Edition), and Lay Sermons (2nd Edition). London: William Pickering, 1839. * Comte, Auguste. A General View of Positivism. 1848. Reprint. Dubuque, Iowa: Brown Reprints, 1971. * Mill, James. An Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind. Edited and with Notes by John Stuart Mill. London: Longmans, Green and Dyer, 1869. * *Mill, John Stuart. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Gen. Ed. John M. Robson. 33 vols. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1963-91. * Mill, John Stuart. A System of Logic. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1874. * Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty. Peterborough, Canada: Broadview Press, 1999. * Paley, William. The Principles of Moral and Political Philosophy. Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 2002 [1785]. * *Capaldi, Nicholas. John Stuart Mill: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. * Carlisle, Janice. John Stuart Mill and the Writing of Character. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1991. * Collini, Stefan. ‘The Idea of “Character” in Victorian Political Thought.’ Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th series, 35 (1985), 29-50. * *Collini, Stefan. Public Moralists, Political Thought and Intellectual Life in Great Britain 1850-1930. Oxford: Clarendon, 1991. * *Collini, Stefan, Donald Winch, and John Burrow. That Noble Science of Politics: A Study in Nineteenth-century Intellectual History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983. * Donner, Wendy. The Liberal Self: John Stuart Mill’s Moral and Political Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press, 1991. * Harrison, Brian. ‘State Intervention and Moral Reform in nineteeth-century England.’ In Pressure from Without in Early Victorian England, edited by Patricia Hollis, 289-322. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1974. * *Halevy, Elie. The Growth of Philosophical Radicalism. Translated by Mary Morris. Boston: The Beacon Press, 1955. * Hamburger, Joseph. ‘Religion and “On Liberty.”’ In A Cultivated Mind: Essays on J.S. Mill Presented to John M. Robson, edited by Michael Laine, 139-81. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press, 1961. * Harrison, Ross. Bentham. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1983. * Hedley, Douglas. Coleridge, Philosophy and Religion: Aids to Reflection and the Mirror of the Spirit. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. * Heydt, Colin. ‘Narrative, Imagination, and the Religion of Humanity in Mill’s Ethics.’ Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 44, no. I (Jan. 2006), 99-115. * Heydt, Colin. ‘Mill, Bentham, and “Internal Culture”.’ British Journal for the History of Philosophy, vol. 14, no. 2 (May 2006), 275-302. * Heydt, Colin. Rethinking Mill’s Ethics: Character and Aesthetic Education. London: Continuum Press, 2006. * *Hollander, Samuel. The Economics of John Stuart Mill (Toronto: UTP and Oxford: Blackwell), 1985: Volume I, Theory and Method. Volume II, Political Economy, 482-1030. * Jenkyns, Richard. The Victorians and Ancient Greece. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1980. * Jones, H. S. ‘John Stuart Mill as Moralist.’ Journal of the History of Ideas 53 (1992): 287-308. * Kuklick, Bruce. ‘Seven thinkers and how they grew: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz; Locke, Berkeley, Hume; Kant.’ In Philosophy in History, Rorty, Schneewind, Skinner (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. * *Mandelbaum, M. History, Man and Reason. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1971. * Matz, Lou. ‘The Utility of Religious Illusion: A Critique of J.S. Mill’s Religion of Humanity.’ Utilitas 12 (2000): 137-154. * Millar, Alan. ‘Mill on Religion.’ In The Cambridge Companion to Mill, John Skorupski (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. * *Packe, Michael. The Life of John Stuart Mill. New York: MacMillan Company, 1954. * Raeder, Linda C. John Stuart Mill and the Religion of Humanity. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2002. * Robson, John M. The Improvement of Mankind: The Social and Political Thought of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: Toronto Univ. Press, 1968. * Robson, John. ‘J.S. Mill’s Theory of Poetry.’ In Mill: A Collection of Critical Essays, J. B. Schneewind, (ed.). London: MacMillan, 1968. * Ryan, Alan. The Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. London: MacMillan, 1970. * *Ryan, Alan. J.S. Mill. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974. * *Schneewind, J. B. Sidgwick’s Ethics and Victorian Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977. * Sen, Amartya, and Bernard Williams, eds. Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1982. * Shanely, Mary Lyndon. ‘Marital Slavery and Friendship: John Stuart Mill’s The Subjection of Women.’Political Theory, Vol. 9, No. 2 (May 1981), 229-247. * Shanley, Mary Lyndon. ‘Suffrage, Protective Labor Legislation, and Married Women’s Property Laws in England.’ Signs, Vol. 12, No. 1 (1986). * *Skorupski, John. John Stuart Mill. London: Routledge, 1989. * Skorupski, John. ‘Introduction.’ In The Cambridge Companion to Mill, edited by John Skorupski. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. * *Skorupski, John (editor). The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. * Smart, J.J.C. ‘Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism.’ The Philosophical Quarterly, (October 1956), 344-354. * *Thomas, William. The Philosophic Radicals: Nine Studies in Theory and Practice 1817-1841. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979. * Turner, Michael J. “Radical Opinion in an Age of Reform: Thomas Perronet Thompson and theWestminster Review,” History, Vol. 86 (2001), Issue 281, 18-40. * Williams, Raymond. Culture and Society 1780-1950. New York: Columbia University Press, 1983. * *Wilson, Fred. Psychological Analysis and the Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: Toronto Univ. Press, 1990. Last updated: October 24, 2006 | Originally published: October/24/2006 Categories: 19th Century European, Philosophers

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Louis Menand’s book, The Metaphysical Club is a self-proclaimed story of ideas in America. Specifically, the book is a narrative history of the birth and influence of American Pragmatism. An ambitious work, which spans from the end of the Civil War past World War II, it traces the intellectual evolution of four main characters: Oliver Wendell Holmes, Charles Peirce, William James, and John Dewey. However Menand’s…

    • 67 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Comparing Devlin to Mill.

    • 1787 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It can be assumed that if J.S. Mill and Lord Devlin ever coexisted some intoxicating deliberations regarding the role of morality in society would transpire. However, time has a peculiar habit of erecting boundaries amid centuries, allowing us only to presume discourse between the contemporary and the historical. Consequentially, each individual has an obligation to formulate his or her own appraisal established through the logistic unification of the particular instant and one's own conception of idealistic righteousness. But the acquisition of an infallible and tangible philosophy with universal application would be as obstinate to create as it would to fathom. In such regard, the apparatus on which debate must rest is well constructed. If each were to believe in the intricate purity of his inspiration than no philosophy but his own would be received. It is subsequently the responsibility of that creature to sell his faculty, ensuing the continued survival of dispute. It is the function of this formula to patiently arrive at a conciliated truth in which the majority of a society can divulge. If the perceived truth were to have an impact on the thirst and fertility of an entire society than it would be in that institution's interest to create a fountain from which everyone could drink. It is this motive that has justifiably birthed meticulous curiosity in the works of both Lord Devlin and John Stuart Mill, each of whom have crafted disparate cures for the perils of harm in society, but neither of whom have succeeded in absorbing the values of the other. However, to adequately dissect values there must first be an ample understanding of the beliefs of each party concerned, only then can one interpret the mutual ethics from the personal.…

    • 1787 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout this paper I discussed Mills view on Nature verses Nurture which is he is belief that we are who we are because of our education and upbringing rather than our nature. I also explained how Mill became a supporter of women’s rights. Next, I explained Mills view of Representative Democracy and how to minimize corruption. After that, I discussed how enlightenment plays a role in Mills views on the tyranny of the majority. The fifth topic that was discussed was about the voucher system and how Mill believes it will lead to higher quality education; followed by Mill’s belief that the middle class should be the backbone of politics. Lastly, I have discussed Mill’s views on inheritance. In conclusion, the views of Mill that have been discussed thus far in class include Mills views on nature verses nurture, women in the Victorian Era, representative democracy, tyranny of the majority, voucher system, middle class and inheritance as well as my opinions on some of these…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Stuart Mill once said, “The amount of eccentricity in a society has generally been proportional to the amount of genius, mental vigor, and moral courage it contained. That so few now dare to be eccentric marks the chief danger of the time.” John Stuart Mill is one of the most prominent English-speaking philosophers during the 19th century. His works incorporated a huge range of topics in his articles and papers he has written, in which a few of them include A System of Logic, On Liberty, and Utilitarianism. Mill’s main goal when composing On Liberty was best seen by taking a gander at how he talked about his work in his Autobiography. Mill composed that he accepted On Liberty to show the significance to man and to the society, of an extensive variety on sorts of character, and the opportunity given to human instinct to extend itself in…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: Mill, John Stuart. Mill: The Spirit of the Age, On Liberty, The subjection of…

    • 1627 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Through the course of this paper the author will try to demonstrate, depicting both sides of the argument, the reasons in which a follower of John Stuart Mill 's "Utilitarianism" would disagree with the events taking place in Ursula Le Guin 's "The One 's Who Walk Away from Omelas."…

    • 1220 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mills is known for his rejection of the ‘American positivist, functional social theory’ found in work such as Parsons. Instead, he became associated with the New Left’s radicalising and liberating movement of the 1950s and 1960, which was undoubtedly affected by the events of the time such as the Vietnam War and opposition to the uneven power distributions within major institutions (Gouldner, 1970). Mills believed in the potential of social change through the student revolts that were occurring across the western world during the 1960s, and opposition to war and individual freedom are very noticeable in his work (Mills 1959, p.3). His new, radical approach to sociology was more critical, less rigid in terms of methodology and conceptions, and was concerned with engaging the public and not just intellectuals (Denzin 1999, p.1).…

    • 2269 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Humanity’s attempts to study the state of society have stretched back throughout the ages. From forefathers such as Socrates or Aristophanes to the great enlightenment philosophers of Locke or Voltaire, all have grappled with the questions of how humanity best functions as a collective. John Stuart Mill, hailed as a paradigmatic liberal political philosopher, continues this tradition of thought in his work On Liberty published in 1859. Mill’s major argument made is that the individual is sovereign in their actions insofar as they do not impeach upon the rights of others. His justifications centre strongly on the principles of utilitarianism, providing a model he believes to offer the greatest happiness to the greatest number. Through specific analysis it can be seen that he optimizes societal benefit by placing import on individuality but conversely justifying exactly when governance and restraint need to be exercised. Overall, his conclusions are an attempt to unify two competing social factors, individual liberty against circumstances in which power can be exerted over another, articulated in what has become known as the ‘harm principle’.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Stuart Mill was considered a Utilitarian. The philosophy of Utilitarianism is that an action should be decided by what is best for society. Mill’s philosophy was in part developed by his upbringing as a child. His childhood was restricted and he was raised in an enviroment where is emotionally needs were not met. Also his father was a friend of Jeremy Bentham. Bentham was a philosopher credited with starting the beginings of the Utiltarianism philosophy. He focused on the relationships between the social classes and working towards social reform. His philosophy focused more on social conditions and human behavior than previous philosophies had. He looked at practical solutions for societies problems and less on the metaphysical aspects…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Good and Evil in High Noon

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sommers, C., & Sommers, F. (2013). John Stuart Mill: Utilitarianism. In Vice & Virtue in Everyday Life: Introductory Readings in Ethics (9th ed.) Boston: Clark Baxter.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are philosophers who addressed the issues of morality in terms of how moral traditions are formed. Immanuel Kant has presented one viewpoint in The Grounding For The Metaphysics of Morals that is founded on his belief that the worth of man is inherent in his ability to reason. John Stuart Mill holds another opinion as presented in the book, Utilitarianism that is seemingly in contention with the thoughts of Kant. What is most distinctive about the ethics of morality is the idea of responsibilities to particular individuals. According to Kant and Mill, moral obligations are not fundamentally particularistic in this way because they are rooted in universal moral principles. Mill and Kant are both philosophers whom have made great impact on their particular fields of philosophy and a critique of their theories in relation to each other may help develop a better understanding to them and their theories individually.…

    • 2746 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sociological Imagination

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Bibliography: Mills, C. W. "The Sociological Imagination." Oxford University Press, 1959. Web. 18 Sept. 2012.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    As a grown man, John Stuart Mill was a man that was highly involved in commercial and intellectual quests, that was his life. Just like the ideal Victorian man, he was completely inside the political and social movements of his era. He had his Utilitarianism circle and highly influenced the way of thinking of his time. The hard work and study was admired back then, and he was able to not only work, but work and study more than anyone else. He worked his way through all of the hardships in his life and worked his way out of the crisis he had in his 20’s.…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Power Elite

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mills does indeed seem to have a penchant for nineteenth century literature, particularly the realists, such as Tolstoy and Balzac (of whom he is also an avid quoter). In his own self, he combines these writers' shared powers of intricate description with their common trait of social criticism, to present a startling analysis of contemporary America.[1] It is perhaps this that Mills brings uniquely into sociological studies of class stratification, power and the state; with his nineteenth century perceptual lens and the new scientific tools of the emerging academic discipline of sociology, he is a able to see beyond the mere convenient rhetoric of liberal democracy, and straight into the alarming trends towards the centralization of power in America, and to the decline of the once proud Great American Public.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Mill, John Stuart. Principles of Political Economy. Clifton, N.J.:Augustus M. Kelley, 1973. Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty. New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Co., 1956 Smith, Adam. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Modern Library ed. New York: Random House, 1937. West, Edwin G. Education and the State: A Study in Political Economy. Institute of Economic Affairs, London, 1970. West, Edwin G. Liberty and Education: John Stuart Mill’s Dilemma. The Journal of the Royal Institute of Philosophy, April 1965. West, Edwin G. Private versus Public Education: A Classical Economic Dispute. Journal of Political Economy, October 1964.…

    • 2242 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics