A Study on Homogeneous Sectioning

Only available on StudyMode
  • Topic: Heterogeneity, Section, Sociology
  • Pages : 24 (3550 words )
  • Download(s) : 357
  • Published : February 28, 2013
Open Document
Text Preview
A Study On The High School Sectioning System
The 4th Year Students’ Perspectives

Submitted By:

Darren Xavier T. Lucenario
IV- St. Francis

Submitted To:
Ms. Jean Victoria Malenab

January 7,2013

Table Of Contents

Title Page 1

Table of Contents 2

I. Introduction

a. Introductory Part

b. Topic

c. Definition of Terms

II. Significance of the Study

III. Research Proper

a. Data, Papers, Researches, and Other Information Gathered

IV. Advantages and Disadvantages

a. Advantages

b. Disadvantages

V. Conclusion

VI. Survey Conclusion

VII. Appendix

a. Questions to Answer

b. Graphs (Survey Results)

c. Bibliography

A Study On The High School Sectioning System: The 4th Year Students’ Perspectives

I. Introduction

a. Introductory Part

Sectioning is the process of dividing students into different classes. This system was

introduced because of the increasing number of students in each year level. Since a single teacher

cannot handle a large number of students, there was a grave need to divide these students into

different classes so that each and every student may be accommodated and given proper

education. The homogeneous sectioning system/process has been integrated with many

educational systems worldwide. However, this system has been currently known to be very

discriminatory and unfair. Many things such as labeling and expectation turn out to cause a

big negative effect on students’ academic performance. HOMOGENEOUS SECTIONING IS

AN UNNECESSARY SYSTEM THAT SHOULD BE ABOLISHED FROM TODAY’S

EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS.

This sort of system greatly affects the aspiration and motivation for academic

achievement thus, hindering the chances of achieving academic excellence. This also has been

known to break the bridge that connects cream sections form non-cream sections due to the

creation of competition, cause of envy and jealousy, and show of favoritism. Indeed this factor

has nothing to do with academic performance whatsoever but out of it sprouts a new problem:

the effect on the social life of students. Non-cream students developed the thought of making

cream students feel isolated from the society or labeling them as “stuck up smarty pants” or

“high achieving nerds” and other negative labels. Cream sections generally have lower section-

status because of their standards and status on teachers and other higher authorities. The attitude

of lower sections on cream sections seem to never change because of the continuous

development of negative factors concerning students.

In abolishing the homogenous type of sectioning, the hopes of unifying students so that

their social life would not interfere with the achievement of academic excellence would not be

far from being successful. But in some cases, it does seem just to have a cream section. First,

there is a class that is surely dependable and can be counted on. Second, representatives for

academic events would not be hard to find. And last, the system of grading honor students would

be a breeze and will be much convenient for those in charge. But then again, this statement may

be considered as too bias. All arguments involving this subject matter seem to fall into the same

factors: discrimination, labeling, favoritism, etc. And this study aims to discover why.

b. Topic

The topic of the study is mainly on sectioning. To narrow it down, the study focuses on

one type which is Homogeneous Sectioning. The other type is Heterogeneous Sectioning which

is the one (technically) being promoted in this study. The topic concerns only the 4th year

students because they are the most experienced of all the HS students and have experienced at

least 4 years of the Homogeneous Sectioning System in HS

c. Definition of Terms

1....
tracking img