Preview

A MODERN REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR COMPANY LAW IN EUROPE

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
69697 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A MODERN REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR COMPANY LAW IN EUROPE
REPORT
OF
THE HIGH LEVEL GROUP
OF
COMPANY LAW EXPERTS
ON
A MODERN REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
FOR COMPANY LAW
IN EUROPE

Brussels, 4 November 2002

THE HIGH LEVEL GROUP OF
COMPANY LAW EXPERTS

Chairman : Jaap WINTER
José Maria GARRIDO GARCIA
Klaus J. HOPT
Jonathan RICKFORD
Guido ROSSI
Jan SCHANS CHRISTENSEN
Joëlle SIMON

Rapporteur :

Dominique THIENPONT

Secretariat :

Karel VAN HULLE

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page

Letter from the Chairman

1

Summary

The High Level Group of Company
Law Experts’ observations and recommendations 3

Chapter I

Introduction

27

Chapter II

General Themes

29

Chapter III

Corporate Governance

43

Chapter IV

Capital Formation and Maintenance

78

Chapter V

Groups and Pyramids

94

Chapter VI

Corporate Restructuring and
Mobility

101

Chapter VII

The European Private Company

113

Chapter VIII

Co-operatives and Other Forms of
Enterprises

120

Chapter IX

Priorities for Action

125

Annex 1

The High Level Group of Company Law Experts’ terms of reference

128

Annex 2

Working methods of the High Level Group of
Company Law Experts

130

Annex 3

Summary of comments submitted to the High
Level Group of Company Law Experts in response to its Consultation Document

136

Annex 4

Existing and proposed European Company Law
Instruments

159

1

LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN
The High Level Group of Company Law Experts was set up by the European
Commission in September 2001 to make recommendations on a modern regulatory framework in the EU for company law. In our First Report of
January 2002, we dealt with issues related to the Takeover Bids Directive, which was rejected by the European Parliament in July 2001. Our original mandate was further extended in April 2002 by the Commission following the
ECOFIN Council meeting in Oviedo to deal specifically with a number of corporate governance issues. Our Final

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    With reference to case-law, and to the current situation in at least two Member States, explain and critically analyse this statement. What implications would the Member States’ reluctance to incorporate the doctrine of supremacy into their constitutional orders have for the consistency and effectiveness of EU law?…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The course will cover the structure and governance of the corporation and the division of corporate powers; the duties and liabilities of directors and other officers; the remedies available to shareholders for the enforcement of director’s duties and protection against oppression or overreaching by controllers. The course considers these legal doctrines and theoretical perspectives as they relate to both public corporations and to small incorporated businesses.…

    • 3601 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The aim of this coursework is to test your understanding of the application of corporate governance issues and application to business situation and your ability to select relevant information and present arguments in clear and logical manner. It also aims to test your ability to relate a case scenario to appropriate regulatory requirements and make an initial evaluation and provide recommendations.…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Fourth Directive

    • 2512 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Company law directives are published under the authority of the Treaty of Rome (Article 54(3) (g)). The council and the commission want to co-ordinate safeguard to protect the interest of member state and others, in such a way that these safeguard are become similar across the EU. The objective of EU is to convey a common market that allows freedom of capital, goods, persons and services between member countries. EU adopted so many directives which are dealing with accounting issues. From that, the Fourth Directive and Seventh Directive are most important. Drafting of the Fourth Directive was started in 1965 when there were only six members of European Communities but it was completed after 15 year in 1978 when there were nine members. The first draft was published in 1971 before the UK, Ireland and Denmark had entered the EU in 1973. The main objective of the Fourth Directive to harmonize accounting principles, presentation, publication and audit, by laying down minimum standards to be applied by members states (Nobes, 2000). It addresses all aspects of the financial statements of individual companies.…

    • 2512 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Facts: Mick, Keith, Charlie, Bill and Brian were directors and equal shareholder of Big Lips Music Pty Ltd. Brian resigned his directorship as a result of differences with Mick, Keith, Bill and Charlie. The others wanted to get rid of Brian as a shareholder. However, Brian told them that he would never sell his shares in Big Lips Music. A general meeting of Big Lips Music’s shareholders is called at which there is a motion to insert a new clause in the company’s constitution that gives Mick, Keith, Bill and Charlie the right to compulsorily acquire Brian’s shares for their issue price. What is the process for inserting a new clause in the company’s constitution? Can Brian prevent the new clause being inserted even thought the others shareholders passed a special resolution that that effect? Required:  Student 1 ‐ Advise the other shareholders of Big Lips Music (the Plaintiffs) what is the process for inserting this new clause in the company’s constitution. If they insert this new clause can they acquire Brian’s shares for the issue price?  Student 2 ‐ Advise Brian (the Defendant) whether he can prevent the new clause being inserted by the other shareholders and if so how? If he can not prevent it will he have to sell his shares for their issue price? Parties The Majority  Mick – Director and shareholder  Keith – Director and shareholder  Charlie – Director and shareholder  Bill – Director and shareholder The Minority  Brian – Shareholder Issues…

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corporate Law

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Acknowledgement: These Tutorial Questions were originally devised by Martin Markovic, Senior Lecturer, Business School, University of Adelaide.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To begin with we will provide a brief background on the case. The fact is , John was travelling on the journey to Liverpool by using the ticket that his girlfriend had bought him. When he was boarding the ferry he was approached by a member of the ferry staff who informed him that he was the 100,000th passenger to travel on the new service. He was also informed that if he would engage in a number of publicity events associated with the fact that he was the 100,000th passenger that he would receive in turn unlimited travel on the ferry for the rest of his life. John agreed with that proposal and was involved in a number of television and radio appearances and his name and pictures was used by the company. Subsequently, John heard nothing from the Superfast Ltd. Last week, he decided to travel to a football game in Liverpool and he contacted Superfast Ltd to arrange his free travel. The company informed him that the ‘free travel for life’was simply a prize that had been made available to him and as he had provided nothing to the company in return so there would be no free travel made available to him.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    company law

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    secondly, even if the articles are not altered, it is unlikely that they give H an…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Available Instruments  Treasury Bills & Bonds  Deposits  Corporate Bonds  Stocks Security Markets  Money and Capital  Primary & secondary Institutions  Regulators  Financial Intermediaries  Colombo Stock Exchange  Brokering Firms…

    • 1902 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Counter-party in corporate transactions (serve as a single contracting party that is distinct from the various individuals who own pr mange the firm);…

    • 2375 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    European Law: Revision Notes

    • 4169 Words
    • 17 Pages

    • There are 785 Members of European Parliament who are elected by the citizens of the member state every 5 years.…

    • 4169 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This is the doctrine to the effect that the separate personality of a corporation may be disregarded if such entity is used to defeat public convenience, justify wrong, protect fraud, or defend crime…

    • 11707 Words
    • 47 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mr. Salomon was a leather merchant in a large establishment. Solomon converted his business into a limited company as Solomon and Company limited with his wife and five children becoming members. Each member took one £1 share each. The company bought the business for £39,000. Mr. Salomon subscribed for 20,000 further shares. The company also gave Salomon £10,000 in debentures (i.e. Salomon gave the company a £10,000 loan, which was secured by a charge over the assets of the company). The company ran into difficulties in less than a year and liquidation proceedings began. The assets of the company were not enough to release the debentures which were held by Salomon. There was nothing left for unsecured creditors (e.g. employees). When the company failed the company's liquidator contended that the floating charge should not be honored, as the company was a ‘sham’ and Salomon should be made responsible for the company's debts. Therefore, the company was a mere agent of Salomon.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study: Company Law

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The shares of ABC Limited, a private company are held by Ann and Andy Anderson and Bev and Bob Brown. The Andersons who together hold 90% of the company shares are concerned that the company is in need of further capital but because of family difference, the Andersons are not willing to inject additional funds so long as the Browns are shareholders in the company. They have therefore decided to pass a resolution which will enable the majority acquire compulsorily at full value shares of the minority.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays