Resources, Conservation and Recycling 43 (2005) 189–208
A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development Damjan Krajnc, Peter Glaviˇ ∗ c
Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Maribor, Smetanova 17, PO Box 219, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia Received 8 December 2003; accepted 8 June 2004
Abstract The focus of the paper is on consideration of how to use indicators to monitor sustainable development in a relevant and useful manner. Integrated information on sustainable development of a company is very essential for decision-making since it is very difﬁcult to evaluate the performance of the company on the ground of too many indicators. The objective of the work was to design a model for obtaining a composite sustainable development index (ICSD ) in order to track integrated information on economic, environmental, and social performance of the company with time. Normalized indicators were associated into three sustainability sub-indices and ﬁnally composed into an overall indicator of a company performance. This was applied by determining the impact of individual indicator to the overall sustainability of a company using the concept of analytic hierarchy process. The demonstration of the model used data for a case study company, Henkel, and a set of sustainable development indicators that were classiﬁed using the currently most widely accepted approach of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). Case study was used to measure ICSD and sustainability sub-indices of the company over the time interval of 6 years. Interpretation of results is given and the utility of ICSD with its relevance for decision-making is pointed out. Using a case study, the paper demonAbbreviations: AHP, analytic hierarchy process; AIChE, American Institute of Chemical Engineers; COD, chemical oxygen demand; CWRT, Center for Waste Reduction Technologies; EMAS, eco-management and auditing scheme; EUR, euro; GRI, Global Reporting Initiative; IChemE, Institution of Chemical Engineers; ISO, International Organization for Standardization; SD, sustainable development; UP, unit of production; VOC, volatile organic compound; WBCSD, World Business Council for Sustainable Development; WCED, World Commission on Environment and Development ∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +386 2 229 44 51; fax: +386 2 252 77 74. E-mail address: firstname.lastname@example.org (P. Glaviˇ ). c 0921-3449/$ – see front matter © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.06.002
D. Krajnc, P. Glaviˇ / Resources, Conservation and Recycling 43 (2005) 189–208 c
strates that the model can be applied to deliver composite indicators of sustainability performance of companies. © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Sustainable development; Sustainability indicators; Composite index; Sustainability assessment; Multiattribute decision-making
1. Introduction Sustainable development (SD) is the concept that plays important role in business and industry of the 21st century. Industry sector is responsible for appreciable material ﬂows within human society as well as the exchange of material and energy with the environment.
Nomenclature Symbols + IA indicator whose increasing value has positive impact in the perspective of sustainability − IA indicator whose increasing value has negative impact in the perspective of sustainability + IA average value of indicator with positive impact in the period selected − IA average value of indicator with negative impact in the period selected composite sustainable development index ICSP + Imin indicator with minimum value and positive impact on the sustainability − Imin indicator with minimum value and negative impact on the sustainability + Imax indicator with maximum value and positive impact on the sustainability − indicator with maximum value and negative impact on the sustainability Imax + IN normalized indicator whose increasing value has positive impact on the sustainability − IN...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document