Preview

A Few Good Men

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
345 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Few Good Men
Lance Cpl. Harold Dawson and Pfc. Lowden Downey are taken to court for a murder that they were forced to perform in the film “A Few Good Men.” They were ordered by their superior Colonel to perform a “code red,” an action that was outlawed by the military many years ago where members of the same squad punish each other for not performing well enough, on a weak soldier named William Santiago. However, they were not to blame for the murder because disregarding an order from an officer is a crime in the military, and if they had not done the code red than they could have been discharged from the military, so Dawson and Downey really did not have any options. 1. The act of punishing and killing private Santiago is objectively wrong because it contradicts natural law 2. The intent, however, was good because all Jessep intended to do objectively Santiago to put out more effort 3. For Harold Dawson and Lowden Downey the circumstances are mitigating because they had no other options. If they ignored the order than they could have been kicked out of the military, but if they did go through with it, which they did, than they could have been court-martialed, which is what happened. 4. Dawson and Downey are use proportionality by choosing between the lesser of two evils. They were taught to always obey orders no matter what, and if they did not than “people die.” So what they figured was that if they ignored Jessep’s order than something worse could happen, and if they did the code red than all that would happen would be that Santiago would be a little more motivated in the future. Overall, Dawson and Downey were only obeying orders so, even though they were objectively wrong for the killing of Santiago, there were mitigating circumstances. Also, the sentence they received, innocent of murder, but dishonorably discharged from the military is the correct one because they did still kill a weaker marine even if they were only following an

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    "Code Red" means nothing to any civilian that hears it, but to a Marine station in "Get-go," or Guantanamo Bay, as we know it, it is an unofficial hazing ritual that teaches new recruits how to pick up their slack. This command is usually given by a superior officer, and is carried out by fellow Marines to "remind" the unfortunate soldier his duty. This is the premise on which the defense bases their case that the acts…

    • 1695 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “the moral arc of the universe bends at the elbow of justice.” In the short story, “Gentlemen Your Verdict”, twenty men and their captain become trapped in their submarine after an explosion. Their captain, Captain Oram, then unjustly sacrifices fifteen of his men to save five others. He takes it upon himself to make a life or death decision for fifteen innocent men. Justice is important to regulating actions and preserving virtue in society. In some cases murder can be justified (such as self defense), but in the case of Captain Oram, fifteen accounts of first-degree murder cannot. Captain Oram’s cowardice hasty judgment, and no one’s right to play God caused the death of these men. Captain Oram is not justified for the deaths of fifteen of his men.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I disagree with this interpretation because despite them being portrayed as cowards, they still stood up for themselves even though there were severe consequences.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Several minutes later Lieutenant Calley returns and says “How come they aren’t dead?” The soldiers then turn to kill them although some seemed apparently uncomfortable and unwilling to do so. The situation in which the soldiers are left alone with prisoners display a similar behavior as witnessed with Why My Lai 1st semester project 46 the subject in the above mentioned experiment. After leaving the soldiers alone with the orders to “take care of them” they show subtle sympathy towards the gathered prisoners in “sparing” their lives rather than shooting them right away. This of course can be interpreted in the individual soldiers’ sense of moral ethics towards his fellow man, but under the circumstances of this specific, somewhat chaotic and brutal event one could just as much assume they are meant to kill the prisoners instead of simply guarding them. Comparing this situation with the experiment we encounter a slight problem when taking the concept of consequence into consideration. For the participant in the experiment there was no immediate consequence in not being obedient to the experimenter and raising the shock level when required. However, for the soldiers in the mentioned situation, they faced an authority figure which during the massacre was known to be life threatening towards the soldiers if they did not do what was ordered. The results of the experiment and the mentioned example differ as we look closer at a situational perspective; nonetheless we see similarities of the two when looking at the result of the given order in the absence of authority. The soldiers involved in My Lai were all part of an institution larger and more powerful than any of those used in the Milgram…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    My Lai Massacre Essay

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    of Company B. After seeing what was happening from above and witnessing Captain Medina kick and murder a civilian woman, Thompson flew between members of Charlie Company and My Lai villagers to fly the villagers to safety. Why would Thompson go as far as to order his men to fire on the American troops if they advanced simply to protect the My Lai villagers, but members of Charlie Company wouldn’t disobey the order to kill them (American Experience)? The placement of responsibility is even more muddied now. Why did one soldier disobey and illegal command, but others did not? It is possible that the specific commanders of Charlie Company were even more forceful with the acceptance of command than other units. This may be the case of Lt. Calley whom many of the troops described as constantly going “above and beyond” whatever Captain Medina ordered him to do (American Experience). Further, Captain Medina was described a through and through military man. Adding on to this harsh command was the fact that “the month of February was the most devastating month” for Charlie Company (American Experience). The troops were tired, frustrated, and had lost nearly 50 men to land mines and snipers at the time of the My Lai Massacre. Before this month, they had spent most of their time simply going to villages and setting up perimeters - a rather lax activity. Does this remove culpability? Certainly not, but it does provide more reasoning behind why the men were so reluctant to disobey the commands at My…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police Officer Case Study

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When a 9-year-old girl is shot in the chest and the ambulance is slow to respond, O’Donnell and Williams violate protocol and transport the girl to the hospital. Their Sergeant notifies them that they broke their policy.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the context of Jurisprudence, the Separation Thesis ideology, the view of Legal positivists, asserts that while legal and moral obligation are separate and there is no necessary connection between law and morals, legal and moral obligation sometimes overlap and it may be necessary to examine the standard of rules as it relates to our obligation to obey them, although, there is no rule to obey laws. 1 Contrary to the view of Legal positivists, the natural law theory denotes that rules of law are derived from principles protecting an individual’s rights and principles of morality.2 In other words, the fundamental criteria for validity of the law is based on principles of justice and morality.3 This essay will briefly examine the origin of the Separation Thesis (the “Thesis’), analyse the Thesis with reference to H. L. A Hart’s views, present opposing views and argue that the claim of the Separation Thesis, that there is no necessary relationship between legal and moral obligation is flawed. Finally, it will provide a conclusion for the arguments set forth.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gentlemen, Your Verdict

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are twenty men trapped at the bottom of the sea in a submarine. Help will…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aastha Bhandari Prof Galloway Hist 1301 19 Set 2017 1. You are a British Soldier that was assigned to protect the Customs House in Boston. An event the colonials call the “Boston Massacre” took place. You have been called back to London and must defend your innocence in the matter.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    My Lai Massacre

    • 1653 Words
    • 48 Pages

    In March of 1968 Lieutenant William Calley entered an area termed "Pinkville" by army officials because "it was particularly troublesome and seemed to be infested with booby traps and enemy soldiers ". After penetrating the area, Calley commenced to round up every person he could see, civilian or not, and unload his machine gun on them. Then Calley ordered his platoon to do the same, no one was spared, women were raped and children were shot. Some men followed Calley 's orders, others stood back watched, and one man even shot himself in the foot so he would have to be medivaced out of the area to avoid the situation altogether. Once the incidence was brought to the attention of Army officials, they ordered a "life or death court-martial for 1st Lieutenant William L. Calley Jr. on charges of murdering 109 South Vietnamese civilians ".…

    • 1653 Words
    • 48 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The lesson in the movie is about the Right to a Fair Trial and the right of due process and equal representation before the law as a basic human and constitutional right. But we see in a Military tribunal these can be ignored.…

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dehumanization is one of the central processes in the transformation of ordinary, normal people into indifferent or even wanton perpetrators of evil, Phillip Zimbardo brilliantly explains in his novel The Lucifer Effect (Zimbardo 157). Dehumanization plays a key role in the military, whether it be utilized concerning the enemy or regarding America’s own troops. In A Few Good Men, Downey and Dawson did not have the privilege of being able to refer to Santiago as a person, they simply were ordered to perform a “code red” on a dissatisfactory marine. Zimbardo accounts for Dawson and Downey’s acts by elucidating that dehumanization resembles a “cortical cataract” that clouds one's thinking and fosters the perception that other individuals are less…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The story begins with Carter Druse being referred to as a criminal for being asleep on his post: ‘The clump of laurel in which the criminal lay' (Pojman, Vaughn 356) yet some may argue that a son shooting his father is immoral and criminal no matter in wartime or not. In keeping with Kantian thinking and philosphy, I think it is the perfect example of putting aside emotions and basing a decision soley on reason and duty.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life in the armed forces is filled with crucial, split-second decisions that must be made. Some of the decisions ask these men to take the life of a dangerous individual in order to ensure the safety of countless civilians. In this case many see this Homicide as Justifiable, however, others believe that nothing can justify a homicide and that a situation can always be resolved with non-lethal methods. When it comes to dangerous military targets, this position is naive as these people would not need to be eliminated if they were willing to reason and felt sorry for their crimes. These service men don't take another life for their own personal enjoyment or gain, but they do it because it is their duty to protect. Justifiable homicide is certainly justifiable when it is used justly to protect others from those who would use it unjustly.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Article 91 Essay

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Article 91 -“Any warrant officer or enlisted member who— (1) strikes or assaults a warrant officer, non-commissioned officer, or petty officer, while that officer is in the execution of his office; (2) willfully disobeys the lawful order of a warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer; or (3) treats with contempt or is disrespectful in language or deportment toward a warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer while that officer is in the execution of his office; shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics