Preview

Zoom Car Company

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
987 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Zoom Car Company
Case Example D

The main legal issues that have come about from this case are very important for many reasons. Zoom Car Company is being sued on part of Daniel Boone for them to pay for his medical expenses resulting from being dragged from his car and being beaten. The reason behind this is his compass that was installed in his car by Zoom Car Company was faulty which lead him in the wrong direction where he got lost and ended up in a horrible situation. Daniel Boone is suing for his medical bills to be paid by the company of the faulty feature the car offered when it was bought. Who should be responsible for Daniel Boone’s medical bills? As the plaintiff he argues that Zoom Car Company should be responsible for his medical bills that were a result from Zoom Car Companies faulty features. Daniel Boone believes that they should be held responsible because if he had a properly working compass installed in his car he wouldn’t have been lead to this bad part of town where he was beaten. Daniel believes he can win this case by the laws under product liability. Product liability entails that “the liability of manufacturers, sellers, and others for the injuries caused by defective products (119).” Zoom Car Company showed negligence by not properly assembling the item, testing the product, and product design. Which makes both companies at risk for strict liability under the doctrine of strict liability in tort, Zoom Car Company and Corrigan Rulers, responsible for the negligence in a product liability lawsuit. “A seller can be found strictly liable even though he or she has exercised all possible care in the preparation and sale of his or her product (121).” The manufacturer and company that sells the product knows at some point the product is going to be sold to a customer and they need to make sure that everything was checked twice and in working condition so they aren’t held responsible for incidents like Daniel Boone’s. You can’t put blame on just the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: On March 20, 1982, plaintiff Marybeth Atkins sustained serious injuries while skiing at Jimmy Peak Ski Resort. On December 5, 1984 plaintiff Marybeth Atkins sued defendant Jimmy Peak. Plaintiff alleged that her injuries were caused by defective ski equipment she had rented from the rental facility on the premises. She further alleged that the defendant failed to inspect ski equipment and the failure amounted to negligence and breach of contract. An amended complaint was filed on February 14, 1986, the plaintiff added counts that the defendant had breached warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. The defendant moved for summary judgment which was granted by a judge of the Superior Court on the ground that the plaintiff’s action was barred by the statute of limitations. The case was transferred to Massachusetts’s Supreme Court by its own motion.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The case of Bradshaw v. Rawlings concerns events that occurred on April 13, 1975. The plaintiff, Donald Bradshaw, was seriously injured in an automobile accident. During this time, he was enrolled as a sophomore at Delaware Valley College and had been attending his class picnic. At the end of the picnic, he left as a passenger in Bruce Rawlings vehicle. Shortly after departure, Rawlings crashed his vehicle into a parked vehicle.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    First Cars Ltd

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Critical path analysis is a method that is used to plan out the many activities involved in a project to be able to find the most efficient way of complete it and how to complete it on time.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pleadings/Complaint

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Comes the Plaintiff Dale M. Roehnig, a minor, resident of Davidson County, Nashville, Tennessee, sues the Defendant Herman A. Schulman, a resident of Davidson County, Nashville, Tennessee, in a cause of action for damages in the sum of Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) and for cause of action would show:…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Riley vs Standard Oil

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Million acting as chauffer is told to drive company vehicle 2.5 miles to pick up paint and return to the mill. Million picks up the paint, sees scrap wood that his sister had mentioned she needed. After passing the mill, Million continues to his sisters home (four blocks in the opposite direction) where he unloads the scrap wood and starts driving back to the mill. On his way back, Million hits and severely injures infant Riley. Riley family sues Standard Oil of New York and Million for negligence.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early 20th century, an injured person sued a car manufacturer for a negligence causing to a defect in its wheel; MacPherson V Buick. The wheel was made of wooden, when its spokes crumbled the car collapsed causing the plaintiff injury. The plaintiff won the case since the manufacturer breached its duty of care, creating an unreasonable risk of harm and that such careless behavior cased the plaintiff injury.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Denny V Ford

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nancy approached a legal battle on three grounds. First, was a strict products liability. A manufacturer who places a product on the market in a defective condition is liable for injury which results from use of the product when the product is used for its intended or reasonably foreseeable purpose. In order for Nancy to use this claim the she had to prove by that Ford Motor Company placed the Bronco II on the market in a defective condition. According to the United States Second Circuit of appeals, “A product is defective if it is not reasonably safe. I instruct you that if the Bronco II, at the time it left the seller's hands, was so likely to be harmful to people that a reasonable manufacturer or person who had actual knowledge of its potential for producing injury would…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Defense Case Study

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The City of Albany decided to upgrade a fleet of repair trucks in order to respond to pothole fixing. ACME manufactured a cab and chassis of a truck that was then sold to Keefer Motors. Keefer Motors sold the truck unchanged to the City of Albany. No discussion by ACME or Keefer Motors had taken place with the City as to what the city would do with the truck. Susan’s Truck Equipment was contracted by the city to add a dump bed and hoist and the truck was modified and redelivered to the City of Albany; the truck was accepted and put into immediate use. Sarah and Emma are city employees and Sarah was injured when Emma backed up the pothole truck over her. Sarah was seriously injured and is suing ACME, Keefer Motors and Susan’s Truck Equipment, arguing that the truck was defective and unreasonably dangerous because the defendants did not advise the City of Albany to install a back-up alarm and they failed to install a back-up alarm.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Description: Terry Fedrick appeals from a take nothing judgment following a bench trial. In one issue, Fedrick argues that he was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law in light of factual findings made by the trial court. We affirm. * * * Fedrick is a truck driver, and he owns a commercial truck manufactured in 1994. The truck apparently developed a short circuit in the wiring and caught fire while it was parked outside Fedrick's home. Fedrick was able to extinguish the fire, and had the truck towed to Nichols's repair facility. Nichols agreed to attempt to repair the truck. One of his employees began the repair job, but could not complete the repair because a part had not yet arrived. The truck was parked outside Nichols's facility overnight when it caught fire again and was burned beyond…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case 1. Javier is traveling from his home in New York to Dallas, Texas. While driving through Oklahoma, his brakes fail and he is injured in the ensuing crash. Javier wants to sue the maker of his car, Energy-Auto Inc. Energy's headquarters is in New York. It does not have any dealerships in Oklahoma or do any advertising in Oklahoma.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Culpepper V. Weihrauch KG

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Contributory Negligence Summary in Culpepper v. Weihrauch KG, ETC.UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, M.D. ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plaintiff Randy Fontenot was driving in the city owned police car at high speeds. When he reached an intersection, FOntenot collided with defendant, Germaine Brooks and Wife, in their car. Fontenot was severely hurt, while Brooks’ wife was killed. Randy Fontenot is sued Brooks and his insurance company, Patterson Insurance. Then the DOTD was added as a defendant in this case because they were responsible for the unsafe intersection. At the trial court they ruled that 90% of the fault was on Mr. Brooks; Mr. FOntenot was liable for 10%; and the DOTD was not liable at all. The Fontenot's the filed for an appeal. The appellate court agreed with the trial courts but they said that Fontenot was not liable at all for the accident. They saide Mr. Brooks and the DOTD were each 50% at fault. Now they have appealed to the Supreme Court.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    case of tort

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Chauncey is a driver for Gardiner transport ltd. While driving the company’s truck on a night run, Chauncey allowed the vehicle to wander onto the shoulder of the road where the upper part struck overhead wires. As a result, electric power service in the areas was interrupted for a periods of five hours. The interruption extinguished the supply of oxygen to browns’ barn and some 30,000 chickens died. Unfortunately, brown had temporarily disconnected the alarm detector in his bedroom and so on the one occasion when he needed it, it was not in operation. Brown bought an action for damages against both Chauncey and Gardiner transport ltd, to compensate him fir the loss of his chickens.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Critically analyze the following case and say whether or not you think that the plaintiff will succeed under the tort of negligence:…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bmw Company

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1987, Norbert Reithofer joined Bavarian Motor Works, or BMW, as Chief of Maintenance Planning. Nevertheless, as Norbert Reithofer was a good student and a sincere worker in BMW, his improvement was fast. Within a couple of years, that is in 1989, Norbert Reithofer became the Director of Controlling Technologies, and after two more in 1991, reached the directorship of the Body-in-White production division of the BMW firm.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays