A young person’s well-being and health should be of the utmost importance in any society. However does the quest for complete wellbeing and health paradoxically damage our children’s ability to be happy within themselves, the aim of this synthesis is to summarise how the government and certain organisations view and put into practice policies and procedures to increase the health and wellbeing of young people. This synthesis will contain information an extracts from three external sources these will be listed in the works cited section of the synthesis Defining well-being
I will begin this summary with a look at how well-being is generally defined. Well-being is a term generally used to describe physical, mental and emotional health. (World Health Organisation, 1948) states that health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity. In this statement well-being is referred to as an attempt to bring together different aspects of health. Hetan Shah has argued that “an incredible amount of money is spent on out “health” service but most of it focuses on dealing with physical symptoms of sickness” and that “we need to reconfigure the purpose of the system in order to promote well-being.” (Shah, H, 2005:39). However some people argue that complete well-being presents an idealistic counsel of perfection that “puts health beyond everyone’s reach” (Lewis, 2001:59). This promotes an unhealthy desire for a person to strive for perfection and to always be unhappy with their current state of health. In 2003 the UK government developed a strategy called Every Child Matters: Change for Children (Dfes, 2003) which is aimed at supporting children from birth to 19 years old. The strategy hopes to achieve a set of outcomes for each child these are: * Be healthy
* Stay safe
* Enjoy and achieve
* Make a positive contribution
* Achieve economic well-being.
These outcomes have been...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document