Multinational corporations produce and sell merchandise to U.S. customers that are mostly made by workers living in third-world countries. Few people are aware of how and where the products they buy are made. People all around the world move to the United States for employment opportunity, but instead they receive unfair treatment in work places. Employees who live in third-world countries that are employed by large U.S. companies are treated poorly as well. Many of these companies are planting sweatshops in China, Bangledesh, Pakistan, etc. These famous brands are multibillionaire companies, and the people working in high positions make more than enough money. Surely, these chairmen and CEO’s can make an investment to make sure their products are being manufactured in a more quality factory with more qualified workers - not that the workers from third-world countries are not qualified, but they can be taught their worker rights and how to avoid safety hazards in these sweatshops. With more knowledgeable workers, they can be paid more reasonably and help the economy of these third world countries rather than increasing the gap of the upper class and lower class. Multinational corporations expand their business into undeveloped countries to hire cheap labor and exploit their workers’ rights by barely paying them and making them work in dangerous environments.
A multinational corporation is a huge company that has divisions in multiple countries around the world. Some recognizable companies are Nike, Coca-Cola, and Marbolo. The divisions of these companies are only subject to the laws of where those divisions are held, so if a company expands into a country, it only has to follow the rules of that certain country. Most companies plant their factories in countries in South East Asia, the Middle East, and Africa. Many of these countries are undeveloped, so there is less environmental restriction. These famous brands specifically target to choose to areas that do not have advanced marketing strategies, low literacy levels, and where agriculture is a dominant industry. Also, by hiring employees in poorer countries, these companies can get cheaper labor and also can get by more easily if they abuse their worker rights. Nike, the multibillionaire sportswear company, went to the extreme by not only using labor from out of the country, but also by employing “children as young as 10 making shoes, clothing and footballs in Pakistan and Cambodia” (Boggan, Common Dreams) to get even cheaper labor. Conducting business on a multinational level has many benefits for the company because of the advantage of obtaining low-cost labor markets, which is the main method of reducing production costs. Also buying material from outside of the origin of the company’s nation is cheaper as well. Setting up business in a developing nation exploits that area and makes the workers believe that getting a job at these multinational corporations are the best chance they have of making money. This just allows the gap between the upper class and lower class to expand because the workers of these famous brands can only retain in the lower class when working these minimal paying jobs.
Sweatshops are workplaces where basic worker rights are not respected. Large companies build multiple sweatshops that can fit many workers and can make as much merchandise as possible in a short amount of time. These factories are not safe places to work at and employees are constantly getting injured. Recently, in Bangladesh, Rana Plaza factory, an eight-story building, collapsed due to unsafe taking more than 1,000 lives of mostly females workers. This was the deadliest disaster in the history of the garment and clothing industry. This large factory made clothes for large companies such as Tesco, Carrefour, Benetton, and Walmart. Hasina, a survivor of the collapse shares her story of the day when she went to work. She told the IPS, “I heard from my colleagues about the cracks in the wall. We did not want to enter the building, but the supervisor forced us.” Now she has an injured hand that she can barely move, and is incapable of working. She has only received a compensation of 36,000 taka, which equals around $450. That is only around a pay of three months. The workers in the Rana Plaza factory “were paid starvation wages-14 cent to 26 cents an hour. They worked thirteen to fourteen hour shifts, six and seven days a week” (Institute For Global Labour and Human Rights) which accumulates to around $37 a month. The supporters of these free market economics defended sweatshops by saying that “they benefit the desperately poor workers of these impoverished countries who are very glad to get the work” (Meyers) These workers do get paid more than farmers or maids living in that area, but this is not a job opportunity worth taking when taking these safety hazards into consideration. It is not morally wrong to hire poor workers in undeveloped countries, but the corporations’ bribe to those workers by offering a little higher pay is not worth risking their lives. These companies should know better than to exploit their own workers and make them think that working in these sweatshops are the best opportunity of making the most money out of their living.
The popular belief of minimum wage is that most workers who receive minimum wage are teenagers, but “almost two-thirds of minimum wage workers are adults, and four in ten are the sole bread winner of their family” (U.S. Department of Labor). Finding the cheapest labor only many benefit the company at that time, but there are so many problems for the employees when they are struggling to make a living working full-time. There is even intense competition between many retailers and manufacturers to find the cheapest supplier, which means hiring the cheapest workers. The minimum wage has been made as a way to ensure that people can make enough money to be able to support themselves and their family, but ironically, that wage cannot even do what it was made for. Michelle Conlin , a senior writer and editor of the Working Life Department of Business Week magazine and Aaron Bernstein, a senior writer on workplace and social issues in Business Week examined more than 28 million American workers. These people work long hours for “low hourly wages without health care, pensions, paid sick days, or other benefits.” These jobs that pay minimum wage do not even give these workers room for any improvement or chance to climb up the economic ladder. Conlin and Bernstein argue that “one missed bus, one stalled engine, one sick kid means the difference between subsistence and poverty.” The way they live is not even in these people’s control. About a quarter of the current workforce earn less than nine dollars an hour, which marks the income of the poverty line for the average family. If the highly developed U.S. are having trouble with paying workers responsibly, just imagine how U.S. companies are paying their workers out of country. Most of the U.S. companies are famous clothing brands like Gap, Banana Republic, and Old Navy use sweatshop labor in under-developed countries. There are more than three million workers manufacturing in clothing sweatshops and in China, the minimum monthly wage is a $63.75. However, according to Jassin O’ Rourke, a U.S. consultant, “labor costs in china are higher than in seven other Asian countries. The average cost …is $1.08 per hour in China’s coastal provinces and $0.55-0.80 in the inland provinces”. Bangladesh offers the lowest minimum wage, at only one-fifth the cost of China. China’s labor costs have been decreasing, so of course there has been more production, but surprisingly, China’s export value decreased drastically by more than 16 percent. These export calls served as a wake up call for factory owners and now are trying to add more value to their chain of factories. When more than a quarter of the population is being paid the minimum wage, the workers are left to be stuck in this cycle of poverty. These jobs do not offer any room to get a promotion or get a bump in the raise for working a certain period of time. The factory owners and exporting companies become richer because of the money they are saving on cheap labor, but their cheap laborers are jammed up in the world of poverty with no where else to go.
There has recently been a huge spike in the U.S.’ unemployment rate. With all the people who do not have jobs, instead of abusing the people in third-world countries, these multinational corporations can offer more jobs for the people living in the United States. Conducting multinational operations has many ethical downsides, but that can be reduced or even eliminated by a better corporate leading strategy. Businesses operating in third world countries can opt to pay higher wage rather than the bare minimum and try to ensure better working conditions. These businesses do not just have to plant production factories when they want to expand their company into other countries. Instead they can try to benefit that local economy by setting up businesses that can improve the economic health of that area. If they set up more headquarters, call centers, or even outlets, there will be a wider gamut of job opportunities and room for the workers to improve and move up their social class instead of all just working in sweatshops. Even though if these corporations set up more occupations, there still has to be factories that make the merchandise, but these factory conditions have a lot of room to improve. Because of the recent disaster in Bangladesh, there are new deals made to improve the safety of the workers. One deal is called “The accord on fire and factory safety in Bangladesh”, where there will be safety inspections conducted in the factories. Also, the employees will be educated on how to exercise their worker rights, such as the right to refuse entry into an unsafe building. Many brands from the U.S. have joined this alliance. After the collapse, the BGMEA (Bangladesh Garment Manufactures & Exporters Association) have closed twenty factories and inspected more than 600 factories. Also, more job opportunities have been made for assessing the safety of buildings and factories. With all of these new job opportunities, there still is a minimum pay, but increasing that pay even by a little will help the economy immensely. A government board in Bangladesh recommended that the minimum wage should be increased to $68 a month, which is almost double the current minimum wage. A family of three living in Bangladesh needs about $67 a month to meet their basic needs. The last time the wage was increased in that country, “consumer prices have risen by 28 percent” (The New York Times). In 1993, the minimum wage was raised which resulted in a higher income for more than fifteen million families, which also helped those move above the poverty line. Even increasing the minimum wage by a dollar would let an average family buy seven more months of groceries, one more year of health insurance, utility bills, and four more months of basic housing costs (U.S. Department of Labor). A main concern of increasing the minimum wage is that people are afraid that it would cost a lot of jobs and reduce employment opportunities; however, studies have found that the previous two increases on minimum wage in the United States actually decreased the unemployment rate. Labor economist Professor Richard Freeman of Harvard wrote, “At the level of the minimum wage… moderate legislated increases did not reduce employment and were, if anything, associated with higher employment…” (U.S. Department of Labor). Raising the minimum wage would help workers and increase productivity because it would also reduce the threat of strikes and protests. There are endless possibilities to open up more job opportunities while treating workers fairly, working in safe conditions, and getting paid reasonably. These multinational corporations can help improve undeveloped countries with these solutions, which will result in bettering not only their economy but the corporations’ as well.
Works Cited
Stefanicki, Robert. "Bangladesh: Rana Workers Still Wait for Justice." Global Information Network. 30 Oct 2013: n.p. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 07 Dec 2013.
Meyers, Chris. "Wrongful Beneficence: Exploitation And Third World Sweatshops." Journal Of Social Philosophy 35.3 (2004): 319-333. Academic Search Premier. Web. 8 Dec. 2013.
French, J. Lawrence. "Adolescent Workers In Third World Export Industries: Attitudes Of Young Brazilian Shoemakers." Industrial & Labor Relations Review 55.2 (2002): 308-323. Business Source Elite. Web. 8 Dec. 2013.
ADDISON, JOHN T., and ORGUL DEMET OZTURK. "Minimum Wages, Labor Market Institutions, And Female Employment: A Cross-Country Analysis." Industrial & Labor Relations Review 65.4 (2012): 779-809. Business Source Elite. Web. 8 Dec. 2013.
YUEN YUEN, ANG. "China 's Labor Cost Problem." International Economy 24.3 (2010): 40-41. Business Source Elite. Web. 8 Dec. 2013.
Ragan Jr., James F. "The Failure Of The Minimum Wage Law." Challenge (05775132) 21.2 (1978): 61. Business Source Elite. Web. 8 Dec. 2013.
"A Living Wage in Bangladesh." New York Times 13 Nov. 2013: A30(L). Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 9 Dec. 2013.
Conlin, Michelle, and Aaron Bernstein. "The Working Poor Are Not Getting By in America." Poverty. Ed. Viqi Wagner. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from "Working ... And Poor." Business Week (31 May 2004). Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 9 Dec. 2013.
Cited: Stefanicki, Robert. "Bangladesh: Rana Workers Still Wait for Justice." Global Information Network. 30 Oct 2013: n.p. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 07 Dec 2013. Meyers, Chris. "Wrongful Beneficence: Exploitation And Third World Sweatshops." Journal Of Social Philosophy 35.3 (2004): 319-333. Academic Search Premier. Web. 8 Dec. 2013. French, J. Lawrence. "Adolescent Workers In Third World Export Industries: Attitudes Of Young Brazilian Shoemakers." Industrial & Labor Relations Review 55.2 (2002): 308-323. Business Source Elite. Web. 8 Dec. 2013. ADDISON, JOHN T., and ORGUL DEMET OZTURK. "Minimum Wages, Labor Market Institutions, And Female Employment: A Cross-Country Analysis." Industrial & Labor Relations Review 65.4 (2012): 779-809. Business Source Elite. Web. 8 Dec. 2013. YUEN YUEN, ANG. "China 's Labor Cost Problem." International Economy 24.3 (2010): 40-41. Business Source Elite. Web. 8 Dec. 2013. Ragan Jr., James F. "The Failure Of The Minimum Wage Law." Challenge (05775132) 21.2 (1978): 61. Business Source Elite. Web. 8 Dec. 2013. "A Living Wage in Bangladesh." New York Times 13 Nov. 2013: A30(L). Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 9 Dec. 2013. Conlin, Michelle, and Aaron Bernstein. "The Working Poor Are Not Getting By in America." Poverty. Ed. Viqi Wagner. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from "Working ... And Poor." Business Week (31 May 2004). Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 9 Dec. 2013.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
* Gap provides a recent example of bad publicity because of sweatshops. In late 2007, it was revealed that some of the company’s clothes were produced by young children in India. Though gap had policies and procedures to prevent the use of sweatshops and children in the production process, it was subcontractor that was operating the facility. The company responded to the bad publicity by announcing plans for “ sweatshop Free” labels for its clothing. They also pledged to increase its monitoring of subcon-tractors and overseas factories.…
- 593 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Children in other countries are living and working in sweat shops that are in the worst of conditions. Not only are they there to make a small amount of money, but some are there to pay off debts that their parents could not afford. Divakaruni says they “spend their day in dark ill-vented rooms doing work that damages their eyes and lungs”(398). The adolescents working in these factories clearly are not of any consideration, and have absolutely no rights. They are being exploited and used selfishly to help profit the company. Not only do they work in horrid conditions but they are not even allowed to take a bathroom break or stand up to stretch with out a pay cut. This is not right, and something needs to be done to help the kids live a life without filth and fear.…
- 1055 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Pember, Robert J. Marie-Thérèse Dupré "BULLETIN OF LABOUR STATISTICS - SELECTION OF ARTICLES Statistical aspects of minimum wage determination" (originally published in the Bulletin of Labour Statistics, 1997-3). http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/stat/publ/bulletin/artminw.htm…
- 1694 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Conlin, Michelle, and Aaron Bernstein. "The Working Poor Are Not Getting By in America." Poverty. Ed. Viqi Wagner. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from "Working ... And Poor." Business Week (31 May 2004). Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 13 Mar. 2013.…
- 1077 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Ravisaankar, Rajeer. “Sweatshop Oppression.” Practical Arguments: A Text and Anthology. 2nd ed. Boston: Bedford St. Martin, 2014. 107 – 109. Print.…
- 650 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Sweatshops provide a form of income for the lower class of third world countries. These sweatshops can help with a developing country’s economy. They also provide a form of safety in some of the more dangerous countries. However, some sweatshops can be bad. Some sweatshop employers can be very abusive toward their workers both physically and verbally. Workers can be treated as property instead of human beings. Health risks also come with these sweatshops. Several different diseases can be obtained by simply working, whether these diseases are obtained by working with chemicals or the close proximity of other workers.…
- 1279 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Society often describes the impoverished with one word, lazy. Society has taught us that if a person wants to be financially successful, it is a simple process of education and hard work that will equate to a successful income. This is the American dream. If the impoverished simply would get a job instead of being lazy, they would not need to rely on programs like welfare. The impoverished would succeed if they only would apply themselves. However, in an attempt to present another point of view, The Working Poor Invisible in America by David K. Shipler (2004) explored multiple variables this group struggles with daily.…
- 3202 Words
- 13 Pages
Best Essays -
Bibliography: Cousineau Jean-Michel, Tessier David and Vaillancourt. 1992. The Impact of the Ontarian Minimum Wage on the Unemployment of Women and The Young in Ontario. Industrial Relations: 47(3), 559-566.…
- 1773 Words
- 8 Pages
Best Essays -
Sweatshop is defined as a factory or workshop, especially in the clothing industry, where manual workers are employed at very low wages for long hours and under poor conditions. Sweatshops also referred to as the “sweat factory”, creates a hazardous and unhealthy working environment for employees such as the exposure to harmful materials, dangerous situations, extreme temperatures and abuse from employers. Sweatshop workers work for long hours, sometimes without taking any breaks, and these workers are not paid for any overtime hours or the minimum wage, although it is mandatory by law. These conditions are considered risky for any person, but the worst part is that in many countries, children are being forced to work in these sweatshops. The term sweatshop is mostly associated with underprivileged developing countries especially in Asia, but sweatshops did exist at some point in United States and Europe. For Americans, sweatshops are history, but in a South Asian country, Bangladesh, people are still working in these horrible conditions, especially children. Child Labor has always been a part of developing countries and a current article about child labor in Bangladesh shows that it is never going to end.…
- 1882 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
By definition a sweatshop is a “negatively connoted term for any working environment considered to be unacceptably difficult or dangerous. Sweatshop workers often work long hours for very low pay in horrible conditions, regardless of laws mandating overtime pay and or minimum wage”. Many corporations in the United States use sweatshop labor in countries over seas such as China to produce their products at a lower cost. As entailed in the letter from a man born in China, many citizens on these countries resort to factory labor to support themselves to escape other sources on income such as prostitution. Without these corporations usage of oversea sweatshops these employees would be forced to return to self-demeaning jobs such as these. However, does the mere fact that overseas factory labor is allowing these people to support themselves and their families provide moral justification for the poor work conditions, and low wages that sweatshop labor provides? German philosopher Immanuel Kant would argue that there must be changes made in the politics of sweatshops to improve there conditions. Using his idea of the “Categorical Imperative” and treating people as “valuable in themselves” Kant would not completely take away the opportunity for these people to support themselves working in factories but make it a more humane system. Utilitarian philosophy would identify the good that these sweatshops are providing for the people overseas, and recognize the harm that could be caused to their lives by removing the sweatshops. Trying to create the most human happiness and prevent suffering a Utilitarian would suggest the continuation of sweatshops overseas with the implementations of better conditions and wages for the employees. Using the ideas of Kant, and the views of utilitarian philosophy, a CEO of a United States corporation could not only identify the positive opportunity these factories provide for poor citizens overseas but also the necessity for the improvement of…
- 1475 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Consumers are becoming increasingly aware of the vast range of goods produced overseas and the often horrifying conditions under which workers labored to produce them. College students, activists, and certain scholars were quick to condemn “Sweatshops” and the multinational companies (MNC’s) that used them. However, this initial moral condemnation was based more on a natural sense of horror than moral reasoning, and critics often demonstrated a lack of sensitivity to both the underlying economic conditions that gave rise to the sweatshop phenomenon and to the beneficial consequences of sweatshops for both their employees and the broader economies in which they functioned. As a result, many economists quickly leapt to the defense of sweatshops. However, currently, all sides to the debate now recognize that sweatshop labor often represents the best option available for desperately poor workers to improve their lives and the lives of their family, and that any attempt to reform sweatshops should be proceed with caution lest the incentives that product this benefit be destroyed. Regardless of much view that sweatshop is the best option, some still argue that sweatshops violates the laws of the countries in which they operate, aside from charging that sweatshops labor, even if mutually beneficial, is nevertheless often or necessarily coercive or exploitative. Sweatshops may also happen to be the best option for the potential workers since they are living in poverty and perhaps unable to adequately provide for themselves and their families, MNC’s provides the worker with just enough money to make the employment offer attractive, and will demand in exchange the worker to work for long hours in dangerous and unpleasant conditions.…
- 1761 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Cited: erbert, Gans J." The Uses of Poverty: The Poor Pay All" (1971): 20-24. PrintShepard, Jon M.. Sociology. 9th. Wadsworth Publishing, 2006. Print…
- 1204 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
They are even known to use children as young as 5 and slave labour. The industrialization of the fashion industry exploits cheap labour and directly violates major human rights. The workers do not have much of a choice as factories can replace them with any thousands of others willing to work regardless of conditions. Within these factories, they especially exploit females who make up most of the industry. For example, providing maternal benefits, as well sexual abuse, “We heard about the widespread sexual harassment; managers call female workers into the back of the workroom, try to touch and hug them and threaten to fire them if they refuse. We were told of the dehumanizing verbal and physical abuse; managers scream at workers…” (Feminists Against Sweatshops). Additionally, there are many cases of factory fires killing hundreds of workers due to locked doors. Sweatshops often violate two or more Universal Declaration of Human Rights, such as, the right to life and living in freedom and safety (3), no slavery (4), no torture, cruel, or degrading treatment or punishment (5), and the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation on working hours. An example from The Corporation, if one bought a pair of pants a portion of the profit would go to a children’s charity. However, investigators found these pants were made by children in a developing country. These sweatshops exist wherever there is an opportunity to exploit workers who lack knowledge and resources to stand up for…
- 704 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
• The United Nations has defined it as an enterprise which owns or controls production or service facilities outside the country in which it is based.…
- 2487 Words
- 10 Pages
Good Essays -
The chapters are followed by a further analysis of the empirical findings. The chapter on wages contains an in-depth explanation of the difference between minimum wages and living wages. In the conducted study all workers were paid the minimum wage in coherence with the law. This wage was however much lower than what the definition of a…
- 13411 Words
- 54 Pages
Powerful Essays