You’ve just been recruited to serve in the Iraq War along with two random people you don’t know: an average man, who according to Wikipedia is approximately 191lbs, 5 feet 10 inches tall, and an average woman- approximately 161lbs, 5 feet 5 inches. After arriving and going through proper training with your new comrades, you're given your very dangerous first assignment; you'll be heading into the front line of war. You have the option of choosing one of the two to come with you: the woman or the man. Instinctually, the man would be a better first choice. Not only are men naturally larger, but also are stronger. Women have time and again proven they're far more prone to stress, and obviously much more sensitive especially when it comes to subjects such as death. Women should not be allowed to be present in combat situations because not only are they inferior to men when it comes to fighting (combat), but they aren't mentally as resilient to face such situations.
First and foremost in factors that matter in combat is physical ability. On average, one would naturally be prone to thinking that men have more muscle. They'd be right. Men are born with a specific hormone: testosterone. Livestrong.com, partners with the Lance Armstrong Foundation, reports that testosterone increases muscle mass. Even though women have testosterone, men's levels overwhelmingly surpass the small amount a woman's body holds - specifically 6-8 mg in comparison to a woman's 0.5 mg. Testosterone provides numerous anabolic effects, including a significant growth of muscle, which naturally provides a man with greater strength. Men not only have more testosterone, but also have larger lungs, which grow a considerable amount during puberty. This provides men with a greater capacity for cardiovascular endurance. Being stronger and having better cardiovascular is very important when you are involved in combat as it requires being able to do certain things with a limited period of time....
Please join StudyMode to read the full document