Preview

Wolsey Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
931 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Wolsey Essay
Using Sources T, U and V and your own knowledge.
Do you accept the view in Source V that Wolsey’s domestic policies were disappointing?

Wolsey’s domestic policies covered a wide range of aspects including his focus on justice, especially through the Star Courts which allowed anyone to stand before him regardless of wealth or status whilst he was also able to practice civil law rather than common law. However Wolsey did use the courts to his advantage on occasion, causing some of the nobility to share resentment towards Wolsey. There is also a lot of focus on his failed attempt at the reversal of the sealing off of enclosed land as he tried to force land owners to allow poorer people to farm on unused land again, this failure showed he could not always exert power on his superiors which bred hatred towards him from the nobility. Wolsey again brewed anger within the nobility as he created a larger tax burden on the richer in conjunction with a lower burden on the poorer. He also managed to cause widespread anger and hatred with the Amicable Grant of 1525, a non parliamentary tax after the Battle of Pavia, by which the public responded with a rebellion and refusal to pay the tax. Whilst Wolsey’s domestic policy had promising ideas, he never managed to please everyone. Also, his role as the papal legate improved England’s connection with the pope.

Source ‘T’, written by Polydore Vergil: a known enemy of Wolsey, criticizes Wolsey’s ‘ambition’ and ‘arrogance’ which in pair would assume a very unlikeable character, also in the Tudor era the public preferred sustainability rather than growth which supports Source ‘V’ in which Dawson explains that the sixteenth century ‘sought stability’ rather than ‘change’. Vergil also expresses that Wolsey held ‘the hatred of the whole country’ due to his ‘hostility’ towards the majority possibly in relation to his failed attempt at the Amicable Grant which forced many to rebel against him: a huge failure on his part, which did in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Source 4, an extract from Scarisbrick ‘Henry VIII,’ gives the impression that Henry gave all power to Wolsey, whilst he “hunted and jousted.” Cavendish then states how the king had “surrendered the cares of the state into the Cardinal’s hands.” This gives the impression that Wolsey had the powers of the king and was in charge of running the country efficiently. This is supported by source 6, where Henry asks Wolsey to watch some of the key nobility as well as “any others of whom you are superior.” This is clearly Henry giving Wolsey freedom to act as he wishes, thus suggesting power being given to Wolsey. Additional evidence of Wolsey’s power, especially over the nobility, can be seen in his work in the Star Chamber where he often imprisoned nobles. In one instance, Wolsey ordered Sir Paulet Angus [named needs to be verified] to follow him for five years in return for the humiliation suffered by Wolsey earlier on in his career. This presents the Cardinal as a powerful figure i8n the government, who could act freely from the king.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many successes of their (Henry and Wolsey’s) foreign policy. Wolsey was a successful peace broker, and the treaty of London in 1518 was a great example of him ability. This treaty in 1518 was an agreement of peace which seemed to put England in to the centre of diplomatic affairs in Europe (which was what Henry wanted). The treaty bound France, Spain, the Papacy, HRE and England against the Turkish. At the time it seemed like a great success as it seemed to signify the end of fear of England being isolated in Europe, however in the long term it failed despite the short term success.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The main success in foreign policy was Wolsey successfully delivering a policy of peace between 1511-25; this is shown in Source 4 where M.D. Palmer refers to the peace at London in 1518, where peace was agreed between twenty countries in Europe, as Wolsey’s ‘greatest triumph’, which it indeed was, at least for Wolsey if not just for England at the time. It’s outcome for Wolsey was appointment as papal legate which granted Wolsey the power to act on the Pope’s behalf which was a great deal of power to hold and definitely a success for Wolsey. The benefits of this peace for England were also quite significant as it meant England was no longer isolated as it previously had been as it was now a key player in European affairs as Henry and Wolsey wanted; this in turn also meant it presented a better image to the other European powers and instilled a sense that England was more powerful than it was in reality. As well as the Treaty of London, Wolsey also planned the events at the…

    • 1761 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    (b) Study sources 1, 2 and 3 and use your knowledge. How far would you agree with the view that Henry VIII’s and Wolsey’s foreign policy was an expensive failure?…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VIII was also very annoyed at Wolsey his adviser at the time for not being able to get him a divorce so he fired him and had him beheaded but he died on the way to execution.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Indeed, there were some aspects of Wolsey’s domestic policies which were particularly disappointing. This is established through the word in source V, “Wolsey sees to carry an air of disappointment”. For example there was clear resentment from the nobility from his policies of Enclosure and Engrossing in 1517 which subsequently left Wolsey having to abandon these domestic policies by 1523 because of the backlash he received. This “air of disappointment’ was also exemplified by Wolsey’s failed process to gain money for Henrys war effort: the Amicable Grant 1525 which failed as it was such a large tax which was bound to stir up considerable opposition, and so it proved. Violence flared in around England, causing Henry to halt the tax. As well as his arrogance and hatred to many nobility in the country which led to him being an unpopular character amongst them. Source T re-alliterates the unpopularity of Wolsey and his policies by stating he was “detested by everyone”, this was common between especially the nobles, however after executing Buckingham and Sheffield in 1521, nobles who threatened Wolsey it is clear that he would do anything to stride in Henry’s good favour. We can also in infer from this source that Wolsey’s steps were for his own benefit and wealth, the Eltham ordinances 1526 is a key example of how he…

    • 1208 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Wolsey was Henry VIII chief minister from his rise to power in 1514 after working himself up until his eventual fall from the king’s favour in 1529. During the time period where Wolsey contained his power he made many changes to England’s domestic policies. For this reason I do not accept the view of source V that Wolsey’s domestic policies were completely disappointing.…

    • 275 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Was Henry Viii's Rule

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    He increased the amount of warships in the Royal Navy from 5 to over 40 and constructed fortifications on the southern coast. Through these efforts, Henry earned the title as the “Father of the English Navy”.Despite frivolous spending on war and luxuries, the dissolution of monasteries brought wealth to England. It pleased the Protestants and furthered the dissolution of Catholicism from the Church of England.Among Henry’s political accomplishments was his granting as Lord of Ireland, as well as the Laws in Wales Acts of 1535 and 1542 which brought Wales into the English Kingdom. These successes point towards Henry increasing the rule of England over neighboring territories. Henry VIII was certainly not the nicest king in England’s history, but many of his goals were accomplished how he wanted them to be. He obtained his male heir, obtained the necessary power to end his marriages, built drastically upon the Royal Navy, and was awarded numerous titles. In the question of success, not everything has to be completely moral to expect a successful reign. While England was sure to see more tough times ahead, it was certainly not broken or completely exhausted of resources when Henry…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    21st January 2015

    • 1208 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During his fourteen years of chancellorship Wolsey exercised considerable influence over Henry VIII's domestic policy during the years 1515 to 1529, involving himself in economic, legal and church affairs. Wolsey was either loved or hated for his wealth, position and manner particularly by the nobility. Some of his domestic policies were relatively successful with some failures, but some such as Finances had an almost equal amount of failures and successes. However, many historians argue that his policies were limited due to Henry’s ambitions in Europe. One aspect that Wolsey did have great impact was justice, with him introducing many new ideas. Although, some of his policies were unsuccessful such as the Enclosures, the policy that was the most unsuccessful and almost a complete failure was the amicable grant. This was a factor in Henry’s lack of trust in Wolsey during the latter part of his position as Lord Chancellor.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite this being the main reason, it is true that Wolsey’s unpopularity was a factor that contributed as well, his many enemies at court provided reasons for Henry to remove him but Henry didn’t get rid of his straight away because Wolsey was able to do what he asked. However, when he failed, Henry took into consideration these enemies (especially the Duke of Norfolk because of his family ties with Anne Boleyn.) and his failures with gaining the nobilities favour. Therefore Wolsey’s ultimate downfall was the failure of not securing an annulment, but his unpopularity and minor failures such as the subsidies were contributing factors to the most important reasons of why he eventually fell from…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How important was his opposition at court in causing Wolsey’s fall from power in 1529? (24 marks)…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This rebirth came after being embarrassed and humiliated by his marriages to Cleves and Howard. It is also important to recognise as Richardson does, that the reason the peace after 1545 is so uneasy is because of Henry’s achievements in war. No longer was there a balance in honour, therefore Francis was stuck in a peace he wanted to resolve - hence the continued sour relations that weren’t seen after the Field of the Cloth of Gold, which was otherwise similar in circumstances. The reason Henry VIII acted in such a reserved, and what has been interpreted as fearful way in 1539, was because of extent of the threat - the potential for a Catholic Crusade from a Habsburg-Valois alliance had a significant potential, in the wake of the Papal Bull of Excommunication against Henry VIII. Had the Treaty of Toledo been followed through it would have presented an existential crisis to the throne. However other explanations for his alliance seeking have been uncovered by McEntegart. He argues that, whilst security still remained a top priority, the king also had theological reasons for discussing with the Schmalkaldic League, exemplified by his considerations, at least on aspects of the Augsburg confession, in order to assist in creating uniformity in the Church. Furthermore he reveals the great plays of Cromwell’s faction in this period against the conservatives in order to further his heretical cause. This in turn led to Henry more closely seeking relations with the Schmalkalden as well as withdrawing from mainstream European politics. Security was secondary to honour, partially due to honour producing a security in its own right, at least in the eyes of Henry, but crucially due to the great focus that was still placed on the role of a chivalric and Godly…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phillis Wheatley Essay

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “The challenge isn’t to read white or read black; it is to read. If Phillis Wheatley stood for anything, it was the creed that culture was, could be, the equal possession of all humanity.” In this quote Henry Gates explains that people criticizing the work of Wheatley are missing the whole point of her work. The bias critics only see a black slave who should not be writing the way she is writing. Her critics overlook the beauty and the amount that her poems inspire people of all color. Throughout Phillis Wheatley’s works she expresses herself and in doing so she writes her way to freedom and becomes the first African American to publish a book of poems in English. Henry Gates is on point when saying that Phillis Wheatley believed in the equality of all people. Wheatley shows her desire for equality by her word choices, faith, and personality.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    english essay

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The author Tina Fanning in the newspaper article “cars no longer sustainable”, which was written in July 2007, contents the effect of car usage on global warming and the effect on the future of our children that proves the high level of harmfulness that global warming causes. The audience in this article is aiming at car users and state governors.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    english essay

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pointed and scathing in its criticism of Australian attitudes to migrants; they will never fit in until they give up everything…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays