Going Nuts over March!
Is spring simple and predictable, or is it volatile and filled with rage? Depending on which ecologist you ask, your answer could vary greatly. Whilst both experts in the same field, both Hal Borland and John Hay will respond to what spring brings in very different ways. This is understandable to a certain extent given that they are ecologists of very different ecologies. However, there is something that both Hay and Borland can agree on; spring is a time of new beginning and of life. The month of March is particularly fascinating when it comes to winter ecology; it marks the start of spring. In what comes to follow, Hay’s and Borland’s views on March will be compared and contrasted, followed by the winter ecology of the Eastern Chipmunk. March is easily one of the most fascinating months of the year; it renews both the old life that was kept dormant for so long during the harsh season of winter, and ushers in a new era as well.
While both authors look forward to spring, Hay is much more impatient than Borland is. Hay takes a more cynical view, and his mood seems to be reflected by the weather. Hay’s brings up that while February is definitely winter, and April is discernibly spring, March straddles this fence. Borland’s account takes into account the ecology as a whole and how it affects his life, as opposed to Hay who seems to write more about specifics. Borland clearly wishes for to be done with the cold and move on to the spring, but accepts the fact that March can be nippy, and acknowledges that the ecology around him does the same. In their March chapters, Borland focuses mainly on animals and plants, while Hays turns his interests towards insects and a bit towards plants. He mentions animals only briefly when talking about how they are slowly emerging from their states of inactivity. However, perhaps where the two ecologists vary the greatest is their views on spring itself.
Borland takes the view “…that Spring is...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document