My partner and I negate the resolution: Resolved:Wikileaks is a threat to United States National Security. For clarity in today’s round, my partner and I offer the following definitions: National Security- National security is the requirement to maintain the survival of the nation-statethrough the use of economic, military and political power and the exercise of diplomacy. Threat- declaration of an intention or a determination to inflict harm on another; imminent danger. To further solidify the framework for this round, we pose the observation that in order to censor the press, the affirmative must show a clear and present danger where there is a risk that outweighs the benefits of the public having the information in question. Contention One-The documents released by Wikileaks are merely embarrassing, not threatening.
Defense Secretary, Robert Gates is quoted as saying that the leaks are “awkward, yes embarrassing. But no, not a meltdown.” It quickly becomes evident that the information released has had no negative effect on national security. Although there exists rhetoric from other government officials which may seem to suggest otherwise, the federal government has not been able to provide any reason that Wikileaks threatens national security or an example as to how it does. This is supported by American Conservitive, which writes, “The federal government, which not-so-coincidentally continues to vaguely say that everything WikiLeaks does is a potential threat to national security, is never being able to cite anything specifically, per Gates's admission.”
Moreover, while Wikileaks may have released some compromising documents or information, it is not a source of “imminent danger” towards the US or its citizens. Wikileaks founder, Julian Assange recently said, “There's no evidence, or any credible allegation, or even any allegation from an official body that we have caused any individual at any time to come to harm in the past four years.” In fact,...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document