Preview

Why I Believe in God

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
949 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why I Believe in God
Cholpon Kurmanalieva

Why I believe in God

I often used to ask myself in the past, “who created all conveniences for human existence? Why is the distance between the Sun and the Earth comfortable for living? Why is there a good proportion of water and land; why do we have mountains, beautiful nature, animals and plants? Why do we have brain, 2 eyes, 2 feet, and 2 hands? Sure, there’s somebody who regulates all these processes on the Earth to make people live. And His name is God. Blaise Pascal says, “A person should believe in God just in case He exists.” As I understand, he says belief in God’s existence means belief in Him. Yes, people had better believe in God, but it doesn’t mean if they don’t, they will go to hell. First, people need God to suppress their instincts and be more sensible. That time when the prophets of God lived, people were not humane. They could easily kill somebody, they stole and lied a lot because of poverty most of all. They could do anything for money. In my opinion, God invented hell to make people afraid of committing bad deeds. Thanks to this policy, humanity became more humane, and nowadays, it still works. The sense that we’re watched by God doesn’t let us commit bad deeds like cheating or deceiving someone for example. Paradise stimulates people to make good deeds: to love, to forgive, support each other in difficult situations, and be thankful. God calls on people to be humane and not selfish. Knowing that God exists helps people remain calm. For instance, if a person is furious at somebody,s/ he will say, “God is a judge for you,” meaning that He will punish that person anyway in this world. Why I say “in this world” is because I think hell is invented by God to regulate people’s behavior, and it doesn’t exist in reality. I rather believe that paradise exists. In all cases people aren’t guilty in their sins. For example, let’ s fancy a person born in a family where parents are alcohol addicted, and s/he’s not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I am writing on John Hick’s piece entitled There Is a Reason Why God Allows Evil. In the selection Hick explains a theodicy, a justification of God’s goodness because of evil, the soul-making view of life in this defense of God’s way in the face of evil. The dilemma of the problem of evil is, if God is perfectly loving he must wish to abolish evil. If evil exists then God cannot be all perfectly loving. Hick’s theodicy, the soul-making view, states that God intentionally placed this evils on earth so that we can over come temptations. God wants humans to go through these test of our convictions so that they can choose good, and they can ultimately undergo spiritual growth. Hick believes that this is not evil but good, and most cannot see though the belief that the world is supposed to be a paradise.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pascal’s Wager was a groundbreaking theory posed by the French philosopher, mathematician, and physicist Blaise Pascal. Pascal, who is said to be the father of modern probability, felt that that religion should be approached as a gamble. It was one of the first efforts to incorporate the concept of infinity. The wager stated that, even though the existence of God cannot be determined through reason, one should wager as though God exists, because living accordingly, has essentially nothing to lose and experiences can only be beneficial. Pascal’s Wager consists of three arguments. The first is the argument from super dominance. Pascal wrote: “God is, or He is not. But to which side shall we incline? Reason can decide nothing here. Which will you choose then? Let us see. Since you must choose, let us see which interests you least. Let us weigh the gain and the loss in wagering that God is. If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing. Wager, then, without hesitation that He is.” In this quote, Pascal is implying that there is a possibility God exists, if one assumes God exists and he indeed does, then one has gained everything, perhaps heaven. However, if God does not exist then one has lost nothing. The Bible would merely be a mistake and He would not exist, along with Heaven or the like. Regardless, it is best to take the gamble because there is nothing to lose, according to Pascal. Pascal’s next argument was the argument from expectation. He supported this argument when he wrote: “Let us see. Since there is an equal risk of gain and of loss, if you only had to gain two lives, instead of one, you might still wager. But if there were three lives to gain, you would have to play (since you are under the necessity of playing), and you would be imprudent, when you are forced to play, not to chance your life to gain three at a game where there is an equal risk of loss and gain. But there is an eternity of life and…

    • 2458 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his arguments, Pascal attempts to illustrate the attractiveness of Christianity by describing the human condition as one of inconstancy, boredom, and anxiety when we are distant from God. In a situation without God, humans are caught in a state of uncertainty, with no stable foundation upon which a meaningful and joyous life can be founded. We are inconstant in that we find it difficult to commit ourselves to a certain issue, only partially devoting our time and thought. Since God is the ultimate ontological good that humanity seeks, without God we are left restless and dissatisfied. Thus, we quickly become bored with our present existence, forever seeking diversions and vain pleasures that might fill the void within us. However, we are ever restless and unhappy until God completes us. As a result, the more inconstancy and boredom we feel, the more anxious we get in trying to obtain some sort of satisfaction in…

    • 3555 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Though, if God does not exist, theists will enjoy fixed happiness, while atheists will too enjoy fixed happiness. In this situation too theists will still in a way have it better because of the comforts of religion. Religion brings it followers a sense of belonging, comfort, happiness, and brings people together. With religion though, one is restricted in certain activities that an atheist could partake in. With atheism or agnosticism you aren’t rewarded in a sense with these benefits that religion brings. Pascal basically says that it is wrong to be an atheist as there is not possible chance to win the prize in the end. Therefore it is rational to believe in…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pascal Wager's Argument

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The existence of God has always been a commonly asked question in the world today. Since there is no scientifically proven answer, arguments have been accumulated over time. One being the Pascal Wager’s argument. This theory states that either God exists or God does not exist, you can either wager for God or wager against God. This belief advocates the belief in God rather than providing evidence. Does Pascal's Wager commit the fallacy of appealing to consequences?…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pascals Wager describes that either God exists, or he does not. By believing he does exist, you do not lose anything if its true that he does not truely exist. And if you believe that he exists and he DOES exist, you gain much from it. As the wager describes, happiness and eternal life.…

    • 352 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obadiah's Impatiences

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hell was created for the banishment of the sinners and nonbelievers, simply as an isolation tactic. But Obadiah made it a form of punishment for the disobedient, making them analyze their doings and primarily wrongs. Creating a taxing pressure on the soul, leading first to discouragement. Then the act of remorse understanding one's wrongdoings and their guilt associated with their actions. Creating a fake hope for Obadiah that his brother the leader of the righteousness, would forgive him for his actions. Providing him passage back to the kingdom of…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this outpouring of emotion the author conveys an annoyed tone that exemplifies to the audience why god is not real.Harris ends his article by explaining how much of the world suffering could be attributed to religion. He appeals to the contrasting idea of good and bad by admitting, “If God exists, either He can do nothing to stop the most egregious calamities, or He does not care to. God,therefore, is either impotent or evil.” (Harris n.p.). And, “Of course, people of faith regularlyassure one another that God is not responsible for human suffering. But how else can we understand the claim that God is both omniscient and omnipotent?” (Harris n.p.). He examinesthe good and bad in order to how god is not all powerful like they say because if he was people in this world would not be suffering. In this examination of god the audience is shown how god cannot be all good therefore he is either unworthy or god is fictionNeuroscientist, philosopher, and best-selling author Sam Harris argues about the existence of a god. He appeals to the logic of basic facts proving that there is no evidence showing the existence of a…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Argument For the Existence of God : A Critical Evaluation There have been many theories for and against the existence of God. For example: the Faith- based Arguments, Pascal’s Wager, James’s Will to Believe, the Contingency Argument and several more. The argument being analysed here however is Ontological argument given by St. Anselm and its counter-argument. In St. Anselm’s argument, God has been thought by the definition: ‘the entity (or being) than which none greater can be conceived’ 1 in the human mind and does not depend upon the world and its existence in any way whatsoever.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The ones that believe in God get blessed with being able to go to heaven. I feel like it’s a good thing bet to believe that God does exist because if you believe that he exists and he does you get rewarded the presence of heaven and even if he's not but you still truly believed he existed you will not be punished for believing in his existence. Being rational means perpetrating to the truth that all one’s judgments, worth, intentions, wishes, and actions must be based on, obtained from, appointed and proved by thinking. A problem is that it isn’t one hundred percent true that if a person bets they won’t lose anything because there are consequences. If a person bets on the wrong god, then the God that is real might end up giving them some sort of consequence for their inappropriate behavior.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cantos

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The inscription on the gate is signifies that God created Hell as an act of justice for all those that sinned during their time on Earth. Although God created Hell as an act of retribution for the sinners, the cruel and unusual nature of the sinner’s punishments spring from God’s primal love and wisdom. The basis of every punishment that God imposes is based on the nature of the sin. For every sin justice must be served because if there were no justice, those who sinned would go unpunished and would be raised into Heaven after death to be with God. If the sinners made it to Heaven instead of going to Hell, it would contradict the creation and sole purpose of Hell. The purpose of the Dante’s journey through hell is to witness the perfection of God’s justice, and also to cause a self-realization to not commit sins after witnessing the repercussions.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pascal's Argument For God

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pascal says “If there is a God, He is infinitely incomprehensible, since, having neither parts nor limits, He has no affinity to us’’ (Pascal, 2). Throughout Pascal’s argument he makes the constant notion believing in order to gain finite happiness, how is it possible to know if God is willing to provide this infinite gain if he is infinitely incomprehensible? This critical mistake is the very reason Pascal’s argument doesn’t work, we just don’t have the knowledge to know about what truly happens after death. Pascal makes his argument for God by noting “you must wager. It is not optional” (Pascal, 3). In which one has the choice of believing in God or not to believe in God, whether we want to risk the chances of infinite happiness or to rot…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pascal's Argument Analysis

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In his argument, Pascal first compares God’s existence to infinity, a theoretical number that has no end. Pascal states that although infinity does not end, the number must be either even or odd like all other numbers we know. Like infinity, God is an unknown being without beginning or end; therefore, Pascal states his existence is possible. After pointing out this comparison, Pascal begins to argue his main point that believing in God is ultimately a wager in which we must choose to believe or not believe. In arguing his wager, Pascal breaks his…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Hell Dabate

    • 2683 Words
    • 11 Pages

    When trying to have a conversation about hell Hendrikus Berkhof says concerning the dominant ecclesiastical idea of hell as eternal punishment that ”there has always been a reluctance to engage in a deeper probing of this frightening conviction.”[1] In other words no one wants to talk about hell some churches have even avoided this topic for fear of losing members. Nevertheless, hell has been a hot topic debate for centuries, and there are many different views regarding hell and the nature of hell. This paper will address two of the most common views in the hell debate. One view called “The Classic View- says that hell is a place of unending torment for the wicked. The Annihilationist view-says that hell is a place where the wicked shall be no more”[2]. In regards to the hell debate there are some who believe that we are living in hell right now here on earth. However, hell is viewed there is always several questions that is often asked. How could a God who is so loving and caring, treat his people this cruelly by banishing them to hell for eternity? How could a God who says that he loves everyone be this mean? Is this how God shows his love for his children? Why would God create us just to torture us? These are all legitimate questions and finding an answer that will please everyone is not an easy thing to do.…

    • 2683 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This, what James quotes in his essay, is not Pascal’s reason for believing in God and as James points out it is probably nobody’s real reason for believing in God(William James 131). What Pascal is arguably trying to do here is point out to a non-believer, that there is a good reason to look at faith more seriously and consider what it can do. Perhaps, if someone reads Pascal’s argument and takes up interest in the church they may well become a genuine…

    • 1689 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays