Preview

Why the Normans won the battle of hastings

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1012 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why the Normans won the battle of hastings
Why Did the Normans Win the Battle of Hastings?

On 5th January in the year 1066, England’s king, Edward the Confessor died. Unfortunately he had no heir, so three men were competing for the throne. These were called; Harold Godwineson, William, Duke of Normandy, and Harald Hardraada. Harold Godwineson stole the throne and became the king. Both William and Harald were furious and were prepared to fight for the country, thus creating the battle of Stamford Bridge and later on, the battle of Hastings

Harold Godwineson was extremely unlucky. When both of the other competitors decided to attack, he didn’t know who would arrive first. He could either take his army north to where Harald’s Viking army would go, or south to wait for William to arrive. He had to guess which way to go and he knew that if he chose the wrong way, he would be letting the entire country down. Eventually he chose north. The army marched north and finally met the Vikings on the 25th September the same year. They fought, and the Saxons won with Harald himself amongst the dead. Although they had conquered one army, many of Harold’s men were injured if not dead, and they now had to march an exhausting two-hundred-and-sixty miles to meet the Normans.

Another main reason that the Normans won was because William had prepared a lot more than Harold for this battle. With him he had brought an astonishing seven thousand, five hundred men to fight with him, who were all fully trained, and about another four or five thousand to help, such as doctors, blacksmiths, chefs and so on. Harold brought about five hundred housecarls, who were fully trained fighters, along with around seven thousand fryd, who were just peasants that he picked up along the way.
The army of the Saxons were desperately in need of rest after their march through the country, but the odds were not in their favour. The battle began almost immediately, so Harold’s men did not have any time to plan an attack or anything. The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Duke William of Normandy won the battle because was well prepared and had a good army. They prepared carefully for the battle. The Normans had knights on horseback who were skilful fighters. William also was skilful and ambitious, and he was determined to be King of England.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thanks to the friendly winds which guided us across the channel, we arrive unopposed on English shores. Defenses are built and fortified as the men, motivated by my words feast on food and wine as we await the moment of truth. We have the advantage over the enemy, for the horses we ride provide us strength and quickness. We are truly blessed that the English have turned back Harald Hadrada and the Norwegians at Stamford Bridge. Now there is one less opponent to fight for my crown. Though battle tested and weary, Harold of Wessex will not easily relinquish what is rightfully mine. Remember, it is Harold who swore allegiance to me after I freed him from Count Guy of Ponthieu. I gave him arms and armor as he swore the sacred oath upon saintly relics. That oath, a pledge to support my claim to the English throne was broken (New World Encyclopedia, 2009).…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    William reset his archers to a good position enabling his archers to get a good aim, as a result of this it created the smallest of cracks in the shield wall, the Norman’s took their chance and ran up to them. After about an hour some Norman’s on the left side retreated and drew some Saxons out with them creating a big gap William started to use that tactic more until there where cracks everywhere, William then lined his archers up once again and shot. This was the fatal moment; Harold got an arrow in his eye therefore causing his death. This had a big effect on the Saxon’s, they didn’t fight as well, some ran away, but others stayed to fight…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another line of reasoning that a lot of people believe Harold Godwinson the battle was the trick the Normans very cleverly played on the English. This crafty trick was about half way through the battle, the Normans realised that when they retreated, the English would follow them. So they made the ‘fake retreat.’ This is where when the English would chase the Normans down the hill, and then circle around slaughtering them in the process. Harold did not fall for this…

    • 544 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    King Haralds Saga

    • 535 Words
    • 2 Pages

    King Harald first gained his political power after the Battle of Stikelsted. Haralds half-brother was King Olaf the Saint, they both fought side by side during the Battle of Stikelsted. During the battle his half brother Olaf was killed and Harold was also injured but managed to escape from the battlefield. During the escape he was helped by Rognvald Brusason and brought into Russia where he first met King Jaroslav. Jaroslav gave Harold the position of commander of his defense…

    • 535 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    They worked through the night making sure that they secured their position especially since they were outnumbered and low on ammunition and gun powder. On the morning of June 17, 1775, the first shots were fired from the British war ships in Boston Harbor and the initial ground assault then began, led by Major General William Howe and Brigadier General Robert Pigot. The British attacked from Bunker Hill but the majority of the fighting was done on Breed’s Hill. The British assaulted the hill three times in total. In the first two advances they were pushed back by the Americans and both times they retreated, but on the third attack the British received reinforcements which allowed them to subdue their rivals on the third assault.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bayeux Tapestry Letter

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There was an incredibly large fleet of warfare ships, which were used to transport me, the duke and other soldiers who fought in the war. The ship used by William was commonly known as the Mora, and it was the biggest from among the other ships. People close to Duke William said that the ship was a gift from his wife who was called Mathilda. The ship was extremely fast. Apart from the duke, there were other leaders, such as Odo, the Bishop of Bayeux. The number of soldiers was around seven thousand men. In Norman culture, the first born son inherits all the properties of the family, the rest of the sons are left to fend for themselves, unless the first born son decides to share his wealth with them. Most of the time, these sons choose to serve in war. This explains the excessive number of Norman soldiers. There were also other supporters of the duke that had come to support him, bringing with them able men to fight in the war. Bishop Odo came with the Bretons. There were also the French, who had been urged to join in the war by William. In return for their service to the duke, they were promised pieces of land. There were the Flemish as well, who would also get pieces of land.…

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1066: The Year of the Conquest, written by David Howarth, tells of one of the most important dates in the history of England. In 1066, William the Conqueror and William of Orange fought the historical Battle of Hastings. The outcome of this battle lead to many changes to the English people. The Norman people became assimilated into the English way of life. Howarth proceeds to tell the tale of the Battle of Hastings through the eyes on a common Englishman.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of Hastings was fought on 14th October 1066 - between Harold Godwinson of England and William of Normandy. The conflict started because when King Edward died, he left no heir to inherit the crown, which left three men claiming to be the next King of England. These three contenders to the throne were Harold Godwinson who was the only Englishman and related to the old king by marriage, Harald Hadrada and William the Conqueror who was the only contender that was related to King Edward by blood.…

    • 676 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On January 5th 1066, the English king Edward the Confessor died-childless. This meant that was going to be a fight over who would have the throne. There were three competitors- Harold Godwinson, William of Normandy, and Harald Hardrada. Harold Godwinson was an Englishman and was brother-in-law to Edward himself.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Harold Godwinson had a few strengths he also had many weaknesses. Harold was a weak leader, he could not control his army. During the Battle of Hastings Harold and his men fought bravely. Although his troops were in a strong position on top of the hill, they were too spread out for Harold to control them. William was able to trick some of Harold’s troops away from their strong position by getting his troops to pretend to run away. When part of Harold’s forces ran after them, they were cut down. This split in Harold’s army and helped William to win the battle. At the Battle of Stamford Bridge, Harold Godwinson marched his whole army to the north. Once they had defeated the Vikings, Harold marched his army all the way down to the south coast, which was unprotected. Instead of stopping to let his army rest, Harold took his army to fight William, the army would have been in no condition to fight.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Luck and timing were central to William’s success at Hastings. Firstly, in advance of the campaign, two of William’s rivals had died; Henry, king of France and Count Fulk of Anjou. This was very significant to the campaign because it enabled William to leave Normandy feeling safe because his two main adversaries were dead, and permitted him to get to Hastings without agonizing over an invasion and to dedicate his full thought to the campaign which lay ahead. When he did embark on the campaign, the weather was in the favour of the Normans. Initially, William had intended to embark in July but owing to adverse winds, the invasion was delayed from the end of July to September; first at the River Dives and then at St. Valery on the Somme. Additionally the Navy were no longer at seas as only remained on the Seas until the 8th September. With the amalgamation of clear seas and good weather on the 28th September, the day of crossing, The Saxons crossed the channel in just over 24 hours. Moreover, unbeknownst to William, this also was an extremely auspicious time for him because if he had arrived at his intended time of crossing in July, Harold and the Saxon army would have been waiting for him. However, it was a time of unease for Harold that year, as it was apparent that England was going to be invaded by either a Norman or a Scandinavian Force, and so Harold was nervous throughout the entirety of his nine month rain. Harold, thinking that he could be ubiquitous, had troops both at the North and at the South, waiting in vain for these invasions; however this only tired out his troops and stretched his resources. The Scandinavians arrived first, and so Harold made the southern fyrd march north to fight the Vikings. The battles of Gate Fulford, led by Edwin and Morcar, and the Battle of Stanford Bridge, were both won by the Saxons, boosting their morale but nonetheless they suffered great losses and the troops were tired where…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Overall in this battle, William defeated Harold because of his luck, and that Harold was unprepared. The most important point in the Battle of Hastings was that William won the battle. He made a last-minute plan during the battle, a plan that resulted in the defeat of the English. And yet what if Harold hadn’t fallen for the trick? Or no Norman knight had doubted the presence of his leader? What if Harold hadn’t been killed? Where would they be as a country…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before William even began preparing to invade, there was a great debate on whether or not the Normans should risk invading England, as it was quite a strong country at the time. William of Normandy won the battle because was well prepared and had a good army. The Normans had knights on horseback who were skilful fighters.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Who were the Vikings? ------The Vikings were also traders , explorers and settlers. They were highly advanced and not as primitive and barbaric as they are portrayed.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays