WHY IT WAS A WASTE OF TIME TO CRITICIZE THE INEVITABLE
Why it is a waste of time to criticize the inevitable according Mr. Cornegie? (Andrew
Carnegie and the “Gospel of Wealth”.) The human life change in many positive ways during the past few hundreds years. According to Mr. Cornegie “The home of one should be the home of everybody that is highest in literature and arts.” His main idea was that every reach people had the responsibility to give their money before they die. However most of the rich people during that period of time didn’t care about publics assistance. Everybody had in their own hands the equal distribution of wealth.
During this period of time the life of millions Americans changes in better ways. These people took advantage of Mr. Carnegie public service educating their selves and also it was essential for the progress of the race. All his donations during this time was for create schools and libraries around the country. In other words what he wanted is that didn’t to see a difference between rich and poor people behavior and attitude. An example was when he visited people at that time at least the outside appearance was alike him.
In” Wealth”, Carnegie examines the modes of distributing accumulated wealth and capital to the communities it originates from. He preached that ostentatious living and amassing private treasures was wrong. The responsibility of distributing his fortune in a manner that assures that it will be put to good use, and not wasted on frivolous expenditure. His ideas was an eloquent testament to the importance of charitable giving for the public good. In other words why if the poor people were making him rich giving back to them few public services.
He was right when he said” Everybody has in their own hands the equal of wealth” because when you have the resources to help the community needs, you have to do something for help them. This time it’s the popular idea that the successful are obliged to “give back to
Carnegie and the “Gospel of Wealth”.) The human life change in many positive ways during the past few hundreds years. According to Mr. Cornegie “The home of one should be the home of everybody that is highest in literature and arts.” His main idea was that every reach people had the responsibility to give their money before they die. However most of the rich people during that period of time didn’t care about publics assistance. Everybody had in their own hands the equal distribution of wealth.
During this period of time the life of millions Americans changes in better ways. These people took advantage of Mr. Carnegie public service educating their selves and also it was essential for the progress of the race. All his donations during this time was for create schools and libraries around the country. In other words what he wanted is that didn’t to see a difference between rich and poor people behavior and attitude. An example was when he visited people at that time at least the outside appearance was alike him.
In” Wealth”, Carnegie examines the modes of distributing accumulated wealth and capital to the communities it originates from. He preached that ostentatious living and amassing private treasures was wrong. The responsibility of distributing his fortune in a manner that assures that it will be put to good use, and not wasted on frivolous expenditure. His ideas was an eloquent testament to the importance of charitable giving for the public good. In other words why if the poor people were making him rich giving back to them few public services.
He was right when he said” Everybody has in their own hands the equal of wealth” because when you have the resources to help the community needs, you have to do something for help them. This time it’s the popular idea that the successful are obliged to “give back to