Preview

Why Is Enlightenment Significant?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2817 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Enlightenment Significant?
Why is Enlightenment significant?

Though originally an apprentice to Horkheimer and Adorno, Habermas’ was not entirely in agreement with the two theorists when it came to their views on the Enlightenment. He seemed to suggest that his mentors went too far in their examination, and he stressed that they gave scientific reason too much credit, choosing himself to base his arguments in the belief that human life and cognitive processes were stronger than simple scientific reasoning. One of the key issues in Adorno and Horkheimer’s Dialectic of Enlightenment is the idea of instrumental reason. In Thomas McCarthy’s The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas, McCarthy asserts that “the “critique of instrumental reason” became the principal task of critical theory, for in creating the objective possibility of a truly human society, the progressive mastery of nature through science and technology simultaneously transformed the potential subjects of emancipation” (McCarthy, 1978, p. 20). In terms of Enlightenment philosophy, one of the main principles was the belief that reason would induce liberation or, to quote McCarthy, “emancipation”. As Dr. Leong Yew notes, in his Political Discourse – Theories of Colonialism and Postcolonialism, “reason elevates the individual from the stifling and oppressive medieval worldview, the individual was believed to be the producer of knowledge, and the individual 's liberties were protected by modern laws” (Yew, 2002). By “the medieval worldview,” Yew is not only referring to medieval philosophy, but also to beliefs such as religion and mythology. However, as McCarthy suggested, the advent of instrumental reason altered those who strove for emancipation. Put simply, instrumental reason was a way of categorizing both man and object alike and assigning it a role within society. In Adorno and Horkheimer’s Dialectic of Enlightenment, instrumental reason is classified like so, “in advance, the Enlightenment recognizes as being and



Bibliography: • Adorno, T. W., Horkheimer, M. (1973) Dialectic of Enlightenment. Tr. J. Cumming. London: Penguin Books. • Crocker, L. G. (1969). Introduction. In L. G. Crocker (Ed.), The Age of Enlightenment. London: Macmillan. • Gray, J. (1993). Post-liberalism: Studies in Political Thought. London: Routledge. • Habermas, J. (1987). The Philosophical Discourses of Modernity. Tr. F. Lawrence. Oxford: Polity. • Habermas, J. (1977). Towards a Rational Society. Tr. J. J. Shapiro. London: Heineman. • McCarthy, T. (1978). The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge: Polity. • Rousseau, J. J. (1755) A Discourse on Inequality. London: penguin Books. • Yew, L. (2002). Political Discourse – Theories of Colonialism and Postcolonialism. Retrieved 18th May, 2010, from http://www.postcolonialweb.org/poldiscourse/liberation.html. Word Count = 2265 (excluding title, citations and bibliography)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Chapters 6 And 7 Module 2

    • 1747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “what is”, and brought other philosophers to become divided about the power of reason in overcoming…

    • 1747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Iroquois Theatre Disaster

    • 2184 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Santayana, G. (2005). In Life of Reason (p. 284). Scribner 's. Retrieved March 3, 2010…

    • 2184 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The authors expressed their Enlightenment ideals through their belief in natural law and a divine creator. They believed all humans should follow natural law, an ideal contradictory to the Puritan era, where religious law dominated society. The authors believed “the laws of nature and of nature’s God” (Jefferson et al. 342) carried enough weight, and that a violation of the law “impels them to the separation” (342). The English “waged cruel war against human nature”(344), thus obstructed their subjects ability to reason by “violating its most sacred rights of life and liberty” (344), the key attributes in dissecting natural law. The linchpin for all Enlightenment ideals was the authors’ belief in a divine creator, who built the massive machine we live in. Humans represent just another piece of his elaborate creation, “endowed by the Creator with inherent and inalienable…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Age of Enlightenment

    • 5159 Words
    • 21 Pages

    The achievements in science from Copernicus to Newton convinced European thinkers that both the ancient and medieval Christian worlds were incorrect and confused about the natural world.…

    • 5159 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    (p 370) It is the love for order in mankind that alone prevents our total destruction. Man’s reason is needed to free us from wrong doing and the injustices in life. We went from an inferior way of thinking to slowly acquiring the ability to think for ourselves. Modernity considers human reason to be the most important aspect of Enlightenment. In addition the main connection seen between modernity and Enlightenment is man’s ability to reason and his optimism.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hist Final

    • 1855 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Since the Enlightenment, the three-fold quest for the meaning of life, for a just society, and for truth itself has become increasingly contentious. This quest is now our own, and if we are to embrace its promise, we must first confront its difficulties. Once again, I would like you to enter into the arguments surrounding the great issues that we face by comparing the ideas of some of the prominent figures we have studied. To do this, please write a brief essay of two to three pages about one of the topics below. Remember to answer both sets of questions for the one topic you have chosen.…

    • 1855 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main theme of the reading, “What is Enlightenment?” is a question that had been discussed in the field of philosophy for centuries and thus the author himself answers this question from a philosophical viewpoint.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Praise of Illiteracy

    • 1882 Words
    • 8 Pages

    "But" you will object, "what about the Enlightenment?" No need to tell me! Social distress rests not only on the ruler’s material…

    • 1882 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hein, Kenneth. “The Age of Reason” NextText: Making Connections Across and Beyond the Disciplines. Ed. Anne Kress and Suellyn Winkle. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martin’s, 2008. (344-349). Print.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Age Of Reason Dbq Essay

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Imagine a world where the government denied your natural rights.In Europe during the 17th and 18th century there were well-educated thinkers who thought of ideas to change modern day society, this day of age was called the Enlightment Period or the Age of Reason. During the age of Reason,Philosophers focused on social, religious,economical and political ideas. Today I will be discussing the political,religious,social,and economical ideas of these thinkers.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Four Eras of Writing

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    With the European Enlightenment, came more of an intellectual and natural way of thinking. Couvares notes how the “rationalist historians”, greatly influenced by Newton and Locke, prospered along with the…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Denis Diderot Analysis

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The historical significance of this passage is that it is a strong representation of the Enlightenment that altered human thinking toward individualistic principles, namely the principles that drove the French Revolution. It is also the introduction of a very expansive and innovative encyclopedia that set a precedent of systematization and comprehensiveness for later collections of knowledge. Taking into account the time and location in history, this excerpt is making a very ambitious and dangerous…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Modern reason, first articulated by Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) in his book Leviathan published in 1651, is a…

    • 5237 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The discussion between Chomsky and Foucault reveals insight into many features of their work, and there is far too much of interest in the discussion to be expressed within the limits of a single article as you can see through Elders request to the men to try to somewhat limit their answers. The discussions raise many questions as to the debates in social and political thought. I am going to examine a limited number of themes in this article. For instance, the title of the discussion, "Human Nature: Power vs. Justice," describes a great deal about each of the antimodernist and modernist positions of Foucault and Chomsky. The discussion touches on past and present debates about ideas of essentialism that are of importance for the social sciences. In this essay I am going to present what I take to be the three main aspects of Foucault's anti-essentialist critique and its effects on social and political thought. This is only one strand of Foucault's work, but it is only these specific themes that I am concerned with here. I will then turn to Chomsky's rationalist account of human nature to show its effect for social and political thought and the ways in which it might be able to counter the powerful anti-essentialist critique made by Foucault. In doing this I will outline three aspects of Chomsky's work as a defense of a…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Introduction eading or hearing about Theodor Adorno’s ideas always results in quibbles. He strikes many as a naïve philosopher because of his reversal of concept and object; some see him as an anarchist because of his relentless critique of rationality; while to others he simply does not make sense, and especially a critique of society based on negative dialectics simply does not make sense to many! These points, however, are precisely some of the key elements of his thought; without a deeper apprehension of these main themes, it would be impossible to arrive at a level-headed appraisal of his philosophy. Adorno’s philosophy revolves around the idea that the history of rationality has relapsed into barbarism; that irrationality itself inheres in rationality. In Minima Moralia, he writes, “Our perspective of life has passed into an ideology which conceals the fact that there is life no longer.”2 What modernity or Enlightenment promises are the liberation of men from fear and the establishment of their sovereignty through the disenchantment of the world and the dissolution of myths;3 this is how we are seduced by Enlightenment. It was through the triumph of knowledge over our caprices that liberation was supposedly achieved. For Adorno, however, this promise of liberation is but another caprice, and a subtle one. The promise hides behind the façade of rationality—of enlightened knowledge—but its real nature is one that contradicts its façade. “There is to be no mystery” in…

    • 3203 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays