Why Is Abortion Legal in the United States?

Only available on StudyMode
  • Download(s) : 163
  • Published : July 15, 2011
Open Document
Text Preview
ABORTION NOWADAYS|
BY :NUR FERINI SHAHIRA BT MOHD SHAPUANNOR IZZATI BT AZMAN| |
BEL 313|
|
JULY 2011|

-------------------------------------------------
Top of Form
Why is Abortion Legal in the United States?

 During the 1960s and early 1970s, U.S. states began to repeal their bans on abortion. In Roe v. Wade (1973), the U.S. Supreme Court stated that abortion bans were unconstitutional in every state, legalizing abortion throughout the United States.

For those who believe that human personhood begins during the early stages of pregnancy, the Supreme Court's decision and the state law repeals that preceded it may seem horrific, cold, and barbaric. And it is very easy to find quotes from some pro-choicers who are completely unconcerned about the bioethical dimensions of even third-trimester abortions, or who have a callous disregard for the plight of women who do not want to have abortions, but are forced to do so for economic reasons.

As a member of the pro-choice movement, I have committed to the idea that abortion should be legal. But even I have doubts, significant doubts, about where my movement is sometimes headed. As we consider the issue of abortion--and all American voters, regardless of gender or sexual orientation, have an obligation to do so--one question dominates: Why is abortion legal in the first place?

In the case of Roe v. Wade, the answer boils down to one of personal rights versus legitimate government interests. The government has a legitimate interest in protecting the life of an embryo or fetus (see "Does a Fetus Have Rights?"), but embryos and fetuses do not have rights themselves unless and until it can be determined that they are human persons.

Women are, obviously, known human persons. They make up the majority of known human persons. Human persons have rights that an embryo or fetus does not have until its personhood can be established. For various reasons, the personhood of a fetus is generally understood to commence between 22 and 24 weeks. This is the point at which the neocortex develops, and it is also the earliest known point of viability--the point at which a fetus can be taken from the womb and, given the proper medical care, still have a meaningful chance of long-term survival. The government has a legitimate interest in protecting the potential rights of the fetus, but the fetus itself does not have rights prior to the viability threshold.

So the central thrust of Roe v. Wade is this: Women have the right to make decisions about their own bodies. Fetuses, prior to viability, do not have rights. Therefore, until the fetus is old enough to have rights of its own, the woman's decision to have an abortion takes precedence over the interests of the fetus. The specific right of a woman to make the decision to terminate her own pregnancy is generally classified as a privacy right implicit in the Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments, but there are other constitutional reasons why a woman has the right to terminate her pregnancy. The Fourth Amendment, for example, specifies that citizens have "the right to be secure in their persons"; the Thirteenth specifies that "{n}either slavery nor involuntary servitude ... shall exist in the United States." Even if the privacy right cited in Roe v. Wade were dismissed, there are numerous other constitutional arguments that imply a woman's right to make decisions about her own reproductive process.

If abortion were in fact homicide, then preventing homicide would constitute what the Supreme Court has historically called a "compelling state interest"--an objective so important that it overrides constitutional rights. The government may pass laws prohibiting death threats, for example, despite the First Amendment's free speech protections. But abortion can only be homicide if a fetus is known to be a person, and fetuses are not known to be persons until the point of viability.

In the unlikely event that the Supreme Court...
tracking img