Preview

Whistle Blowing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1441 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Whistle Blowing
A whistleblower is someone that raises a concern about a wrongdoing that is happening in their company or organization. There are many things that the whistleblower can reveal such as the breaking of laws, exposing fraud, corruption, or health and safety violations. These allegations can expressed to the people that run the company or organization and they can be expressed to the outside world such as the media or law enforcement. The whistleblower normally faces reprisal from their company, related organizations, or sometimes from the law.
Whistle blowing happens when people get caught between business and social responsibility. They have to decide what is best for the business and what is best for the world. In the Insider Big tobacco denies that nicotine is an addictive drug. Jeff Wigand is a tobacco executive and has to decide whether or not give an interview with 60 minutes about cigarettes and if nicotine is and addictive drug or not. Jeff signed a confidentiality agreement with his company saying that he will not disclose any information about nicotine. Even though he is fired and receives death threats, Jeff decides to give the interview and whistle blow on his company by exposing the facts about nicotine that his company was hiding.
There are three elements in whistle blowing and when these elements are combined they make whistle blowing very bitter and distaste full. They are dissent, accusation, and breach of loyalty. Dissent is a disagreement with a superior or the majority which can be hard to do in a work environment. Whistle blowing’s dissent is shedding light on a risk and assigning responsibility for the risk. The whistleblower also accuses someone of who is often higher on the corporate ladder than him. When he accuses this person it is like he calls that person a foul and that gets the strongest reaction from that person and they try to defend themselves. The whistleblower is calling out his own colleagues and this is seen as a breach of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Tim Barnett, Assistant Professor of Management at Louisiana Tech University, wrote an article expressing why he thinks companies should adopt a whistleblowing policy. Whistleblowers are individuals that call attention to possible wrongdoing and are exposed to a great deal of controversy. Some believe whistleblowers sacrifice themselves, professionally and personally to reveal practices that are fraudulent or harmful to the public. Others believe they are just disgruntled employees who are accusing people that have mistreated them. The truth probably lies somewhere between the two opinions. In some ways it is beneficial to have whistleblowers out there because they…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chap 21 outline law

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    F. Whistleblowing-occurs when an employee tells government authorities, upper-level managers, or the media that her or his employer is engaged in some unsafe or illegal activity.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Acct 573 Week 1 Homework

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Whistleblowers are the main ones that expose white-collar crimes in contemporary society. Whistleblowers are the ones that let the authorities and the public that another person is being involved in illegal activities occurring in the work place. Illegal activities can include fraud, violations of rules, laws, and or procedures. A whistleblower may tell someone within his or her organization or someone in law enforcement. In order to be a whistleblower according to federal authorities, the…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    During the nineteenth century a legal rule was developed giving employer’s unfettered power to “dismiss their employees at will for good cause, for no cause or for cause morally wrong, without being thereby guilty of a legal wrong.” (Halbert, 2012, p. 49). This legal rule is commonly known as Employment-At-Will and ultimately the employer has the rights to sever the employer-employee relationship at any given time for any given reason and whether or not the employee thinks wrongful separation. It is a topic that is debated for many years and in today’s current economy and unemployment rate steadily increasing “Employment-at-will” is a doctrine that is being used more frequently as employers experience their present day lows. Employers however have to keep in mind the other that in 1960, federal civil rights laws created remedies against employers who fire workers because of their race, national origin, color, religion, sex, age, or disability (Halbert, 2012, p. 49). Later, in 1970s and 1980s, federal and state statutes include protection from retaliation for employees who report violations of environmental or workplace safety laws and those individuals are commonly known as “whistleblowers”. In essence, whistle blowers are typically long term, highly loyal employees who feel strongly that their company should do the right thing, because in the wave of scandal with major firms such as Enron and World.Com; Congress enacted corporate fraud reform legislation which provides provisions to protect those who report financial misconduct in publicly traded companies. This law is known as Sarbanes-Oxey, or SOX (Halbert, 2012, p. 50).…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mike Rich

    • 2507 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The whistleblower poses no single entity, whether it being a single person or a business as a whole, to count itself immune to the dangers of corruption or malfeasance. Those who blow the whistle can neither risk the silencing of themselves for reasons of concrete evidence that question the proper moral and ethical interests of the public eye. According to Sissela Bok, “’Whistleblowing’ is a new label generated by our increased awareness of ethical conflicts encountered at work. Whistleblowers sound an alarm from within the very organization in which they work, aiming to spotlight neglect or abuses that threaten the public interest.” Take Frank Serpico, for example, a man whom was willing to risk his life, yet alone his career, to sound the alarm on the corruption within the very organization for which he worked for, the New York Police Department. Here in my discussion, we will examine and discuss Serpico’s case in correlation to the points made by Sissela Bok’s discussion on whistleblowing.…

    • 2507 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Silkwood

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    While there are many rewards to whistle blowing, there are also many risks to whistle blowing as well. One of the rewards of whistle blowing is that the laws or acts being violated will be corrected by the correct regulation agencies. Whistleblowers are even able to submit a confidential report online through National Whistleblowers Center website where attorneys review the information and give advice on the best ways to proceed with the investigation. There are also information and additional resources available for those who are thinking about blowing the whistle on their company. A risk of whistleblowing on the company can lead to alienation between the whistleblower and their…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When faced with a difficult situation of morals, choice, and possible destruction of a person’s protection and survival, individuals find themselves in a formidable situation. This is a common occurrence for people who become known as a whistleblower. There is a problem in the United States with protection of individuals for whistleblowing in the workplace, and not enough is being done for these individuals. Whistleblowing is increasing and has become more common, more frequent, and sometimes dangerous. Individuals could potentially face the inability of obtaining another job because they are stigmatized as a whistleblower. This paper will focus on two questions: How does the society’s view support whether someone will blow the…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paradox Of Missing Harm

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The three paradoxes that Davis claims the standard theory give rise to are the paradox of burden, the paradox of missing harm, and the paradox of failure. According to Davis, the paradox of burden perceives the whistle-blower as a good Samaritans because they take on substantial risk in their career, financial securities, and personal relation. The standard theory does not provide sufficient condition to justify such risk. Second, the paradox of missing harm argues that the whistleblower is reported damage after the fact, and they often act in the condition that they can prevent harm. Finally, the paradox of failure indicates that the whistleblowers have little success in preventing damage.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Employment at Will

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Whistle-blowing is an example of a public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctrine. The term refers to an instance of reporting by an employee of an employer’s violation of the law or wrongdoing. A majority of states have established laws that offer some form of protection for whistle-blowers. One congressional act, the Whistleblowers Protection Act, and one statute, the Federal Whistleblower Statute, have also expanded protection for…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Hutson (2014), “It is generally accepted that there are two types of whistle-blowing: internal and external. Internal whistle-blowing typically involves reporting concerns up the chain of command within the organization in the hope that whatever the problem is, it will be resolved. External whistle-blowing involves reporting concerns outside the organization and in particular, the media” (p. 251).…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Whistle blowing is a time when confidentiality could be breached. There could be information that has been escalated to the senior management team in a school and nothing has been done about it, or it is blatantly obvious that nothing is going to be done about it. Maybe where a member of staff has been told to keep quiet or ignore something by the SMT that needs to be moving to other professional bodies then that is the time for the Whistle blower to speak out to the authority concerned. This unfortunately means a breach of confidentiality but it has to be done or harm may come to someone as a result of no action. There may sometimes be a time when confidentiality protocols have to be breached for example if a child is at risk from living in a dangerous…

    • 2659 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government whistleblowers are very disputed in society, with many people believing that they should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, while others praise their efforts for reform. Whistleblowers are people that expose illegalities and corruption in government because they believe that it is better for the public to know for their own well-being. Oftentimes whistleblowers are charged under the Espionage Act for exposing measures of national security, although the determination of what is and is not considered national security information is a very precariously drawn line. Government secrets decided to be national security are officially supposed to be information that must be kept a secret to protect the nation; they are something…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Care

    • 2184 Words
    • 9 Pages

    5. The Whistle blowing policy can be used for your protection in the event you witness or experience discrimination or bullying at work.…

    • 2184 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    (Raybeck, 2010) This misconduct can be in the form of: a violation of any law, rule, or regulation; gross mismanagement or waste of funds; abuse of authority within the workplace; as well as specific danger to public health and safety. Whistleblowers can be employees, suppliers, contractors, clients or any individual who somehow becomes aware of illegal activities taking place in a business either through witnessing the behavior or being told about it. They may hold a position that will enable them to know exact what type of wrongdoing has occurred within an organization. They can remain report wrong doing confidentially; however, they are able to attend any proceedings related to the…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Whistleblowing”, “raising concerns” and “speaking up” are all phrases which describe disclosing information to an employer or where appropriate a regulator, police or the media about malpractice, wrong doing or a risk to safety.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays