CRITICAL REVIEW (600-900 WORD ESSAY) ON DANIEL COYLE'S: THE TALENT CODE Name:
Review on : Coyle, Daniel. "The Sweet Spot" The Talent Code. Greatness Isn’t Born. It’s Grown. Here’s How. New York: Bantam, 2009. 11-29. Article Reference Link: http://issuu.com/rabberson/docs/the_talent_code_chapter1?mode=embed&backgroundColor=FFFFFF&layout=http%3A%2F%2Fskin.issuu.com%2Fv%2Fcolor%2Flayout.xml When Mistakes Are Gold
Our understanding of talent has been shaped by our encounters with people of significant abilities. Whenever we see olympians displaying seemingly elusive techniques or youtube personalities showing off jaw-dropping music/acting abilities, the likes of us "commoners" will immediately proclaim that they are talented. Though a large part of society seems to feel that talent is innate, there exist those who challenge this notion, bringing with them their own views on how talent should be defined. Daniel Coyle's The Talent Code takes on this challenge from an interesting and fresh perspective. The "Sweet Spot" introduces Coyle's hypothesis that "talent" isn't all innate, but can be built with practice. In particular, he explores the idea of making mistakes and repeatedly correcting them to make learning more efficient and effective, a process he calls deep practice (definition on p. 18). Throughout his exploration, he questions society's receptiveness and perception towards making mistakes, constantly reflecting upon how important mistakes are in our learning process. Coyle uses mainly anecdotes as support for his argument. In his "talent-hunting" expedition (pp. 11-14), he recounts how two young people, Brunio and Jennie managed to perfect a skill (soccer and singing respectively) through practice. His observations serve to highlight that constant, focused repetitions of a particular action along with mistakes can eventually lead to perfection. Also, he aims to expound on how talent transcend time and space, being able to...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document