Author(s): Giovanni Sartori
Source: Political Theory, Vol. 1, No. 1 (Feb., 1973), pp. 5-26 Published by: Sage Publications, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/191073
Accessed: 13/10/2009 12:35
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=sage. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
Sage Publications, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Political Theory.
WHAT IS "POLITICS"
Universita di Firenze
HE CONCEPT"POLITICAL CIENCE"derives its meaning
from the interplay of two variables: (1) the state of the organizationof knowledge, and (2) the degree of structural differentiation within the frameworkof human collectivities.
With. respect to the first variable, the notion of science makes little sense-or at least no precise sense-unless there exist division and specialization in the cognitive endeavor. Thus, it does not make much sense to speak of political science as long as "science" is indistinguishable from philosophy-ie., as long as any and all scire defines itself as love of wisdom. The notion of science, therefore, achieves precision when scientific knowledge has been weaned from alma mater, from philosophical knowledge. Of course, science is also different from what is commonly called opinion, theory, doctrine, and ideology. But the first and most fundamentaldistinction is that between science and philosophy. EDITORS'NOTE: This is part one of a two-part article. The second part will appear in a forthcoming issue of Political Theory. This article has been reviewed by the
author and translated by Professor O. Ragusa of Columbia University. It appears as a chapter of Volume 6 of the History of Political, Economic and Social Ideas edited by LuigiFirpo, Torino, UTET, 1972-1973.
[61 POLITICALTHEORY / FEBRUARY 1973
With respect to the second variable,the notion of politics applies to everything,and therefore to nothing in particular,as long as the realmsof ethics, economics, politics, and society remain united and are not embodied in structural differentiations-that is, in structuresand institutions which can be qualified as political in that they are different from those which are declared economic, religious, or social. The most difficult knot to unravelis that between the sphere of politics and the sphere of b
society. But the knots are many, beginningwith the overlapping etween the nomenclature that has its roots in Greek-the words derived from polis-and the nomenclaturethat stems from Latin.
Let us say, then, that the notion of political science variesaccordingto what is meant by science and what is meant by politics. Thus, it is quite futile to speak about a "perennial"political science which is born with a
Aristotle,rebornwith Machiavelli, nd which maturedinto an autonomous...