What is Literary Theory and do we need to study it?
It is possible, even now in the 21st century, to complete a degree course in Literature without doing any literary theory. You might do perfectly well—even emerge as a star in the firmament of literary study—without ever having to engage with any of the by now canonical areas of literary theory, like formalism, structuralism, poststructuralism, psychoanalysis and deconstruction. You could even get by, with no damage at all to your credentials or to your understanding and appreciation of literature, without doing any Marxism or feminism. Literary study remains strong and identifiable in its own right and is composed today, just as it was 50, 100, 150 years ago (but not much further back than that), of all kinds of activities like editorial work, criticism, appreciation and commentary that cope quite well on their own grounds without any interference from what many students would recognize (with a groan) as theory. Literary Theory might, therefore, be considered as something over and above the normal requirements of literary study. In the least sanguine sense of this over and above, we might charge it with superfluity. It is quite unnecessary for us to study theories of literature in order to study literature. In another, more difficult sense (and here we are now beginning to actually do some theory), theory’s superfluity to the normal requirements for reading and studying literature has proved over the years to be a tremendously productive resource for more adventurous readers and thinkers. So much so that the field—no matter how independent of theory it remains—has nonetheless been transformed in all kinds of ways by the insistence of a certain dogged theorizing that just goes on whether we like it or not. So it would not be strictly necessary to take a course in Literary Theory. Against this, of course, many programs insist on a minimum requirement—a core course in literary theory, approaches to...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document