Historical interpretations of the trio’s trial, its purpose and significance vary. In F. S. Siebert’s opinion, Prynne’s case illustrated how, “early Stuart kings continued on their way, extending repressive measures as their efforts to convince by argument and exhoration failed.” From historian Anne Patterson’s perspective early modern English writers had to adapt to a political environment in which censorship prevented open political discourse. Charles and Laud, from this perspective, sacrificed “the power of illusion”so that they might “preserve the illusion of power.” She further argues that “by making Prynne a martyr, Charles took and irrevocable step toward civil war and a polarized culture.” She also perceives Prynne’s experience to serve as a sign “that codes governing sociopolitical communication had broken down, that one side or the other has broken the rules. Like Patterson, Kevin Sharpe recognizes the symbolic value of Prynne’s trial but not as a sign of disintegrating political regime. In depicting the reign of Charles I as a time of consensus and... [continues]
Cite This Essay
(2009, 07). What Do the Trials of Prynne, Bastwick and Hampden Reveal About Religious and Political Controversies. StudyMode.com. Retrieved 07, 2009, from http://www.studymode.com/essays/What-Do-The-Trials-Of-Prynne-219901.html
"What Do the Trials of Prynne, Bastwick and Hampden Reveal About Religious and Political Controversies" StudyMode.com. 07 2009. 07 2009 <http://www.studymode.com/essays/What-Do-The-Trials-Of-Prynne-219901.html>.
"What Do the Trials of Prynne, Bastwick and Hampden Reveal About Religious and Political Controversies." StudyMode.com. 07, 2009. Accessed 07, 2009. http://www.studymode.com/essays/What-Do-The-Trials-Of-Prynne-219901.html.