Preview

Advantages and Disadvantages of Representative Democracy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
699 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Advantages and Disadvantages of Representative Democracy
What are the advantages and disadvantages of representative democracy?

Representative democracy is where the public people vote for and elect a person (called an MP, Member or Parliament) to portray and voice the opinions of the area the MP was elected in. They will take the views of their constituency on board when speaking in the House of Commons. A country which uses this is the United Kingdom.
One of the advantages of representative democracy is that even with over 60 million people in the UK the system of representative democracy works very well. This is in comparison to direct democracy where things are unworkable. Even though Direct Democracy is the purest form of democracy it is extremely expensive to run and cannot be done regularly. AV referendum 2011 (Alternative Voting) cost £75 million, whereas MP’s average salary is £60,000. However the downside of this is that all elected MP’s will have their own and their party’s agenda to look to too and therefore might overlook the wishes of the people that voted them. Also any new parties and pressure groups that there may be are given the freedom and the right to operate how they want and are allowed to pressurise the government into looking at their views and beliefs. Although with representative democracy parties get off and do not get to have their voice heard it does create a pluralist society
Although representative democracy is good in the way that MP’s get chosen by the public it is still a very selective process. MP’s are usually white, middle class, middle aged men. This does not give an accurate representation of the UK as there are a lot of ethnic minorities. However there are very few MP’s who actually represent these minorities. For example, in the UK there are 8% BAME’s (Black Asian Minority Ethnics) however only 4% of those are represented in parliament. Likewise with women, there are 50% of women in the population of the UK, however only 23% of parliament are women. Again this doesn’t show

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There is an argument that the government has the power and right to change laws and represent people without necessarily having to be elected. This can also be known as ‘Democratic deficit’. An example of democratic deficit is the House of Lords. The members in the House of Lords aren’t elected but they get to make laws and represent the people. The members in House of Lords are usually given their seats hereditarily so many people found it unfair that they’re not elected into the Parliament but they can make decisions and laws on our behalf.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Proportionality is a key factor in assessing the fairness of a voting system, if a parties number of votes is not equal or close to their number of seats in parliament then the voters’ are being misrepresented. AMS is a PR system, which results in a party’s percentage of votes being more in line with the number of seats they win in parliament. The list MSPs ‘top up’ the constituency MSPs to make the overall result within a region approximately in line with the wishes of the electorate. In the 2011 Scottish Parliamentary elections Labour received 3 ‘top up’ MSPs to better reflect its level of support across the North East region as it received 44,000 in the 2nd vote. This shows that AMS allows for good representation in Parliament for voters. However, FPTP does not allow this same proportionality in Parliament, and in turn less representation of the electorate’s views as a whole. FPTP produces a disproportionate result. The two main parties have concentrated support in certain areas so win constituencies and seats. Smaller parties such as the Green Party and UKIP, with less concentrated support than Labour and the Conservatives, lose out under FPTP. For example, in 2005 Labour received 36% of the vote but 55% of the seats. The Lib Dems only received 10% of the seats with 22% of the vote. This shows AMS is more responsive to the will of the people as the composition of parliament will more closely represent the wishes of the electorate as it has an element of proportionality unlike…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Power in theory in this system should lie with the commons and the chamber as they should be able to voice their opinions, and fight the policies of government properly but obviously parliamentary control does limit this a huge amount as how can this be true if a party does control power the opposition will be outnumbered and effectively be a lame duck and completely pointless. It means that parliament and the mps who are not inn government or the majority party have to literally sit there and can no longer really help their constituents on the issues that matter to them this certainly limits parliaments main function especially in opposition parties in particular. Secondly there is the argument that in politics and the majority party in particular there is a certain do as your told attitude, there is no more free thinking in parliament on a large scale anymore, mps are merely there to toe the party line as they cannot really step out of line as they may be deselected at the next election. This is a huge threat to there jobs basically but is very effective on behalf of the large party as it means that party whips will have to be used less, as most people in the party know that if they want to go far into the executive then they basically must…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civics Eoc Study Guide

    • 3272 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Representative Democracy – the citizens choose a smaller group to represent them, make laws, and govern on their behalf, but the people remain the source of the government’s authority.…

    • 3272 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main functions of backbench MPs is scrutinize the government and hold them to account via different ways, and it is this function which proves them to be highly effective. Their role in Parliament ensures and strengthens the democratic legitimacy of the executive, thus giving government the authority and right to exercise political power. Another key role of backbench MPs is to act as cross-section of the larger society and therefore represent their interests in Parliament. However, the increase of power held by the government further supports the Burkean view that an “elective dictatorship” has formed considerably in the UK political system. In addition to this, many people have argued that backbench MPs have limited power in actually calling the government to account due to the party system, which ensures that MPs are dictated by ministers and party whips – who use persuasive methods (the promise of promotions or the threat of expulsion/demotion) reduce the effectiveness within the political system. There are both arguments for and against the effectiveness of backbench MPs, however it is debatable as to which outweighs the other.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due the nation's interest in materialism and individualism, we have gained a certain lack of interest in political matters and affairs – people find politics dull and many people think that it doesn't affect them, this results to certain inhabitants obtaining a 'laissez-faire' attitude toward the government. Nowadays citizens around the UK aren't aware of political dealings; this supports the idea that today's society has become far more materialistic when compared to the previous generations. Many people take the approach that the government can 'do what they want' as the majority of Brits spend their time worrying about getting the next best iPhone etc. The UK has become very divided in the past 20 years due to the generation gap between certain individuals in society. Today's generation of teenagers have become disinterested in the UK's current affairs, this may be down to the fact that they have not been socialised to consider the country's events, which in turn blames the next generation and their lack of interest in how Britain is governed, this has lead to the UK's population becoming far more self aware as opposed to considering others. On the contrary, the elderly people in today's society were raised with slightly different morals and views on how their country was governed. Previous generations deemed voting to be a privilege, something that they had earned – the majority of this generation wouldn't even dream of not voting...out of respect. This highlights how the change in generations has prompted the UK to dive into a participation crisis.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Democratic Is the Uk?

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Secondly, First Past The Post has had a big impact on UK democracy. The system we use to elect our MPs has a real impact on how politics works in Britain. It has a direct effect on whether politicians truly represent us and whether we can hold them to account if they let us down. The defeat of the 2011 Alternative Vote (AV) referendum means it is now more important than ever to discredit our failed system and we are continuing to build the case for change at Westminster. This in turn means any of our votes just don’t count. Millions of people have no chance of deciding who their MP will be. And our votes are wasted by the system. Additionally, parties continue to focus all their time, money and effort on a handful of 'marginal seats', so just a few thousand voters can decide who runs Britain.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most telling indicator of there being a democratic deficit in the UK today is the continuing decline of voter turnout at all elections for the past 60 years. There is a growing level of general apathy towards political issues in the UK which is not just damaging to the health of a democracy but fatal. The government requires a mandate to govern, if they do not achieve popular consent then how are they representative of the people?…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secondly backbench MPs allow the current government to be made accountable to the electorate. Backbenchers can take part in scrutinising opposition, or even their own parties, during events such as the Prime Minister’s Question Time, where, for an allocated time, the PM is asked questions concerning anything. Select committees can also be used to scrutinise. For example the head of the Public Bills committee is always headed by a member of the opposition, currently Margaret Hodge. This is to ensure that they are effective and non-corrupted. Although MPs have the power to dissolve the current government, through a vote of no confidence (last one in 1979), MPs that standalone against their party by having controversial or independent thoughts on an issue, then they are brought into line by party whips which could result in having an MP who does not represent you adequately. It shows that MPs achieve more together.…

    • 630 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the beginning of the time period, 1850, Britain was not democratic. There was not a lot of choice concerning the political parties, there were only two parties: The Liberals and the Conservatives. Woman did not have any right to vote and were considered second class citizens. In England and Wales only one million and five men could vote and some men could vote twice. The distribution of seats did not take into account the migration of Britain. The House of Lords (HOL) were aristocracy that were their because of their ancestry. MP’s were unpaid and had to own property so the poorer classes could not be MP’s and therefore opinions not heard. A democracy is one which has universal suffrage, equal distribution of seats, wide range of choice of parties that cover a wide range of issues, everyone has the right to be an MP and the HOL should be trusted members of the public. By the end of the time period, 1918, the majority of these had been overcome, lots of people had the right to vote, redistribution of seats made it more equal, there were now more than two parties, the property qualification in becoming an MP was abolished and they were paid salaries and the HOL lost the right to veto laws and hold them for two years, they could only hold them for one year.…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The current system under the Westminster elections is first-past-the-post. This is a majoritarial system in that winner-takes-all. Those who are in favour of PR argue that the FPTP system is under-representative towards minor parties and votes are then typically ‘wasted’. However those who are in favour of the FPTP system point out that it leads to a strong government, a clear outcome and keeps extremist at bay. Proportional representation is a institution of different electoral systems that produces a government based on the votes of the electorate and is proportion to the seats that the party receives. This system is different to the current Westminster formula in that the percentage of votes gained is the same as the percentage of seats received.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As well as a decreasing number of people voting in general elections there is a similarly decreasing number of people becoming members of political parties and this is another reason to agree that there is a participation crisis in the UK. In 2010, only 1% of the…

    • 888 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1999 Labour reformed the House of Lords; Labour removed 600 hereditary peers and reduced it to only 92 hereditary Lords in the House of Lords. However, the labor government did propose a system of “elected peers”, where the public could choose peers to sit in the House of Lords. This proposal was never fully implemented into the UK constitution. Until this proposal is full entrenched it is argued that the Lords are not democratically legitimate as all policy making institutions must have legitimacy. Therefore, there is much that can be done towards constitutional reform.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The UK is currently facing a declining participation from the general public in formal politics. Since 1997 turnout for general elections has declined significantly and party membership has dwindled to an all-time low. Between 1951 and 2008 Conservative individual party membership has decreased from 2,900,000 to just 250,000 and Labor 876,000 to just 166,000.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The mechanisms placed in the House of Commons to ensure its effectiveness are vital to the democracy and overall quality of governing within the UK. Whilst government domination proves to be the key hindrance affecting the quality of the Commons’ work, the checks and balances and opportunities to scrutinise produce an effective chamber in regards to the most important of its functions.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics