LDR 531 - WEEK 1
Tyco – Examining a Business Failure
University of Phoenix
Ho Sung Lin
Tyco – Examining a Business Failure
In 1960, Tyco International Ltd. was founded by Arthur Rosenburg and became publicly owned in 1964. From 1973 to 2001, Tyco International Ltd. saw rapid growth through the acquisitions of various companies with “annual revenues of more than $500 million and a net worth of nearly $149 million (Tyco, 2004-2009). The New York Stock Exchange describes Tyco International Ltd. as a “diversified global provider of security products and services, fire protection and detection products and services, valves and controls, and other industrial products” (NYSE, 2009). As a diversified industries company, Tyco International Ltd. is comprised of five sections: ADT Worldwide, Electrical and Metal Products, Fire Protection Services, Flow Control, and Safety Products (NYSE, 2009).
While the company may have seen huge returns on their acquisitions, the Securities Exchange conducted an investigation of Tyco International Ltd. resulting in the resignation of then CEO Dennis Kozlowski following accusations he misused millions of company funds for personal gain. In addition to Kozlowski, then CFO Mark Swartz was also accused of the falsification of financial statements to raise stock prices resulting in the selling of stock for over $500 million dollars. Following the resignation of Kolzowski, the new CEO was Ed Breen who quickly restructured the board of directors and the senior management staff of Tyco International Ltd. Organizational behavior theories such as organizational misbehavior and the lack of organizational citizenship behavior may be able to shed some light on why Kozlowski and Swartz choose the path of unethical and illegal behavior.
Organizational misbehavior may be defined as “any intentional act by an organizational member within the organizational context that violates organizational and/or societal norms” (Vardi & Wiener, 1996). The implication of the definition of organizational misbehavior is the act of misbehavior is intentional but it does not specify the act is, or will be, harmful. The act of organizational behavior in the case of Tyco International Ltd. was one of being intentionally beneficial to both Kozlowski and Swartz which in turn was intentionally harmful to the company.
As senior management team members, the decisions of both Kozlowski and Swartz to obtain personal loans for millions of dollars from the company were unethical and illegal. How can Tyco International Ltd. expect their lower level employees to behave in an ethical manner, if the behavior of the top managers is questionable and resulted in legal action against the company by the Securities and Exchange Commission? The case of Securities and Exchange Commission vs. Tyco International Ltd. alleged violations of federal securities laws, $500 million erroneous operational income due to improper accounting practices, the inflation of operating income of over $500 million and inflated available cash flow of over $700 million, and the failure to report executive compensation or executive debts in the millions of dollars (Securities and Exchange Commission vs. Tyco International Ltd, 2006).
Ferguson felt “social information is central to the development of contagion” (2006). With the size of Tyco International Ltd. would it be safe to assume others knew of the behavior of Kozlowski and Swartz? If so, Ferguson reasoned “witnessing or learning of an employee who engages in organizational misbehavior without fear of being caught or reprimanded is a basic ingredient in creating a contagion effect”...