A response to:
Summarize two of the authors’ arguments (one argument from each article).
Identify and discuss one further implication of one of those arguments. Considering the author is “right,” what sorts of claims or facts would follow from that argument?
Eastland, T. (2011, January 17). We the people. The Weekly Standard, 16(17), 7–8. http://search.proquest.com.libproxy.edmc.edu/docview/84678573,
As long we judge the idea of the Tea Party to be held true, and that every bill to be considered should do so according to our Constitution. We can must submit to this idea, as it is predisposed tend true according to the Letter of Transmittal to the President of Congress from our first President, George Washington. “It is obviously impracticable in the Federal Government of these States to secure all rights of independent sovereignty to each, and yet provide for the interest and safety of all. Individuals entering into society must give up a share of liberty to preserve the rest” Washington, G. (17/Sept/1787) This portion of our rights we have freely given to the person that we voted into the Senate or the House of Representatives, may he or she be a Republican or Democrat, or other to vote our voice.
1. Letter of Transmittal to the President of Congress. In Convention. Monday September 17th 1787. http://constitutionus.com/#validation
Human Inventory Control As the writer has stipulated, every voter should be given the opportunity to voice, or cast a vote on the matter regarding the decision to carry human-tracking devices. So, as implied, Brittan Elementary School students in Sutter should have been given a voice in the decision to have school badges with tracking devices. Their collective voices could have been heard through the establishment of a Student Council, and secondly, the parents of these students living in this school district should have also been given a vote. “The Student Council will be a representative structure for students only, through which they can become involved in the affairs of the school, working in partnership with school management, staff and parents for the benefit of the school and its students.”
Reference
1. Student Council Constitution for Cavan Royal School http://studentcouncil.royalschoolcavan.ie/Home/student-council-constitution 2.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The Articles of Confederation, drafted by the Continental Congress in 1777 and ratified in 1781, became the first constitution of the United States. The original draft, prepared by John Dickinson in 1776, contained provisions for a strong and possibly…
- 543 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
How do Classical Republicanism and Natural rights philosophers affect the Founders view about government because, both the Classical Republicans and Natural Rights philosophers impacted the Founders view about the government. In the preamble it shows that there are more Classical Republicans signatures and a few Natural rights philosophers’ signatures. The three court cases that I chose were Betts v. Brady, Bowers v. Hardwick, and Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan. In the first case Brady v. Betts in 1995, Betts was the offender, who robbed a place in Maryland but could not afford and attorney. The 6th amendment then comes into play because it sets forth rights related to criminal prosecutions. Betts could not defend himself in the case and he was sent to jail. Classical Republicanism is shown here because Betts stated he did not have an attorney to the judge. And the Judge and said that in the 6th amendment it did not include the rights to an attorney. Which also rules in favor of Natural Rights philosophy? The second case I decided to go with was Bowers v. Hardwick 1985, Michael Hardwick was being observed by a Georgia officer while he had been engaged in sexual intercourse with someone of the same sex. Hardwick’s first amendment rights were violated by the police officer by observing Hardwick in his own personal life. In this case it shows a huge chunk of Classical Republicanism because the court had agreed with Hardwick that he had violated his rights. Although the officer had denied the fact that he violated the rights of Hardwick, the court still sided with Hardwick. In my last case Lorreto v. Teleprompter Manhattan 1982, a company had violated a customer’s rights to privacy which means violating the fourth amendment. Classical Republicanism is shown in this case because they say it is a violation of privacy. Natural rights Philosophy is show because they say that the company…
- 710 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In Philadelphia, 1787 the united states constitution was drafted in a series of meetings and conventions. None of the delegates were interested in a meeting to talk about the weak A.O.C, but once they were lured to Philadelphia the delegates realized that they need something to replace it. In the meetings they discussed that the government wasn’t strong enough, they didn’t have a strong hold over taxtation and, they talked about the peoples’ individual rights.…
- 532 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Articles of Confederation, written in 1777 by the Second Continental Congress, were initially proposed to…
- 758 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Map: Two Worlds Circa 1960 1) Including the Soviet Union, list two countries in the communist…
- 546 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Gooch, John, and Dorothy U. Seyler. Argument! 2nd Ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2011. Print.…
- 919 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The first thing that Wes does to investigate the type writer is simply just examine it. He also…
- 692 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
State in your own words two of the author’s leading propositions and list the arguments supporting those propositions.…
- 1077 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Argument/Finding (What position did the author take? What were their main points? What are their claims/conclusions?) (75)…
- 2260 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
On September 12, 1787, the convention was finished and on September 17, 1787, thirty-nine delegates signed the document of new laws they had written, called the Constitution. The convention was sent home and the Constitution was sent to the individual states for ratifying. This started a whole new set of debates but ultimately, with some agreements of amendments, the Constitution was accepted as the new law.…
- 962 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
It’s difficult to grasp the idea that our founding fathers created a legal document that represents freedom and justice for their own economic self -interest. They have accomplished this by implementing laws to protect their equities against popularly…
- 1646 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Thomas Jefferson's Words: “...That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, —That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it...”…
- 362 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Washington, George. “George Washington papers at the Library of Congress, 1741-1799. Continental Congress to George Washington, June 19, 1775, Commission as Commander-in-Chief”. Library of Congress.…
- 4952 Words
- 20 Pages
Best Essays -
Overall Comments:Hi Kimberly,Thank you so much for turning in this assignment. You have offered a competent mapping of the articles. You have generally identified the issues, premises, and conclusions and offered a substantive explanation for each. Your post is addresses all points in the assignment. Better organization of the writing would have strengthened the paper. Several mechanical and formatting changes are present. See comments above and in the text for specifics.Good work on this assignment! I hope this assignment has helped you clarify concepts relating to analyzing arguments to identify the issues, premises, and conclusions.…
- 1277 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
We the people, in this article the Author talks about how congress is passing laws without any kind of consideration to their authority to do so, essentially, they are implying that they are above the law and can do what every they want to do. The Author wonders if congressmen are really living up to their oath, if they feel its ok to not abide by the constitution and go against American people and their rights. The Author brings the debate over the mandate included in Obamacare, which said that all Americans need to buy health insurance or face penalty for not having one. Then he brings in a question that a reported asked Nancy Pelosi a House Speaker “where specifically… the Constitution grant(s) Congress the authority to enact individual…
- 160 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays